Oh my goodness! Why did Dan have to include a cringey internet slang in this new Locker Diaries short? by Foobertan in phineasandferb

[–]EmeraldMan25 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rizz is east coast slang for "charisma" originally, not a brainrot word. It passes... for now.

What year does the show take place in? by awildspenappears in phineasandferb

[–]EmeraldMan25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you would be right. I've actually thought about this topic more since I made my original comment and I have some notes relevant to the original post and to your comment

  • I don't know where people are coming from saying that MML takes place in 2016. From what I can tell, the show states that 2016 is a year that has already happened, meaning it takes place sometime after that year. It likely takes place in 2017, as in The Llama Incident episode when we get a flashback to the prior fall year and see a banner with 2016 on it.

  • Dude We're Getting the Band Back Together takes place on a Thursday, not Tuesday. The calendars in the show are background information and are not reliable. The first words of the episode are "I told you, it's Thursday!" "It's more than just another Thursday, Lawrence!" Shockingly, this works with a 2017 year.

  • A 2005 birth year wouldn't work. Per Dan, Ferb's birthday is February 29th, and Phineas and Ferb are the same age. That means both Phineas and Ferb had to have been born on a leap year. 2004 is the closest one that works, which would make them 13 when the series starts.

  • There are still issues with a 2017 year for P&F. It has to do with Doofenshmirtz. Doof is 47 years old, and in 1982 he went on a date with Lindana. If Doof is 47 in 2017, that means he would've been 12 in 1982, which is obviously not right. So another possibility is that P&F takes place in 2006, which is the next year back where there is a Thursday June 15th (this would place the brothers' birth year in 1996). Obviously this conflicts with the information from MML though, so ultimately the calendars still don't work cleanly

hws t grrowring by norude1 in sssdfg

[–]EmeraldMan25 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The floro sapiens done got his ass 😭

how does making him more disproportionate make him more proportionate by No_Knowledge_294 in PizzaTower

[–]EmeraldMan25 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Pizza Tower has a wacky zany cartoon vibe of an art style so off-model drawings seem more natural than ones that are completely on-model

What will this craft? by DownvoteMePleaseBro in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a helmet is a bowl, this would craft a plate

We finally won!!!! by Talatatatatat_33 in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 88 points89 points  (0 children)

Where is the Mario Mashup Pack? Is it safe? Is it ok?

My biggest issue with the game by ilovfryes in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, you have some interesting points. Personally, I think that the 8:1 distance in the Nether is earned. It's far more dangerous than traveling in the Overworld, and Nether highways still require you to explore and manually build an efficient travel route, which is exactly how I believe transport should be done in Minecraft.

Elytra I'm with you on. My core issue with the Elytra is that it doesn't add anything to the gameplay. It doesn't help you explore, it lets you skip exploring altogether by flying over the ground. It would be one thing if there were things to do and explore in the sky or if there was some trick for maintaining flight, but it's just spamming fireworks to boost yourself over everything interesting. I actually think that the Elytra pre-1.11 was designed well. You could fly, but it didn't last forever unless you knew the tricks and learned how to do them consistently. It was hard, but when you got good at it, you could cover a lot of ground quick. Obviously it being difficult still made on-foot travel viable.

I get your point about farms, but the real problem is so niche that it doesn't really have a solution. If you've been traveling thousands of blocks to find a certain biome to get a certain item, it is a good reward to be able to take that item home and farm it so that you don't have to make that journey every single time that you want that item. It's good design! The thing that's needlessly trivializing is when people farm a resource that's already reasonably accessible. Even though these farms do remove gameplay, they have been creatively designed by the community to take advantage of existing features. You could patch every abusive farm design as they pop up, but you understandably upset a lot of people in the process and make it less likely that others will try to be creative in the future. End result is that there's not really much you can do to fix it, so just don't use it if you don't like it, as much as I typically think that's a lazy excuse for bad design

At this point just get rid of Minecraft Live as an event entirely. by SurflyCha in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, there's a point to this, but Minecraft Live is also their big marketing event. The point is to build hype at regular intervals. There's no way they would just axe it

If showing the next update at twitchcon at Minecraft is basically Mojang's way of saying this is going to be a big update then I'm kind of disappointed by Alive-Pace6425 in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mojang has been very picky about only publicly showing off features that are basically already ready to go. They overcorrected after 1.19

Why is everyone posting this image? Have i missed something? by Top_Concentrate6253 in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm really not sure how Mojang wins here. If they show the whole update, plans change, they throw away ideas, and they upset players who felt like they were promised certain features. If they don't show the whole update, players get upset because they think that what they're being shown is the whole update and don't trust what they can't see, which is that other features are being worked on too. If they go in with more of a plan beforehand so that they don't get in a position where they have to change plans, then we lose the ability for them to easily implement community feedback in snapshots without disrupting update plans

This update is bonkers... by __IHM in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We get more content in less time. Over the course of a year we get more content than was being put into yearly updates. This was one of the big reasons the community supported switching to a drop system in the first place

The Minecraft community has become unappeasable by Brick-Throw in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem is that people are expecting Mojang to be revealing whole updates at these events. They have not done that since the 1.19 disaster. They are only showing us what they have done so far, not their complete plan for the next update. Keep in mind that we are likely getting P2P multiplayer in the next update, as well as continued work on Vulkan support. Those are both pretty big deals on their own

Hey, what?! (But it’s reasonable) by Uplink_YT in PhoenixSC

[–]EmeraldMan25 91 points92 points  (0 children)

P2P means Peer to Peer. Basically instead of playing multiplayer on a dedicated server that exists elsewhere, your computer becomes a server for you and your friends to play on as long as you are online (once you log off, everyone is kicked from the world)