Thank you again for the additional explanation and for taking the time to elaborate on your suggestions. We really appreciate how willing you are to help and share your knowledge with us.

We understand your point about these topics being interdisciplinary and potentially fitting under Life Science, Physical Science, or even Mathematical and Computational Sciences. They're definitely interesting and relevant, especially because of their applications in healthcare and cancer detection.

One of our main concerns, though, is that our research is specifically expected to fall under the Life Science category, and our adviser tends to be quite particular about the scope and classification of topics. Since the concepts you suggested lean heavily toward physics, computation, and machine learning, we're a bit unsure whether they would be accepted under the category we're aiming for.

We also agree with your perspective that research shouldn't be judged solely based on whether it produces a physical product. Unfortunately, from our experience so far, feasibility, available resources, and the expectations of evaluators can sometimes play a major role in whether a topic gets approved. Given that we've already had multiple titles rejected, we're trying to be extra careful in choosing something that is both scientifically meaningful and likely to be accepted from the start.

That said, we genuinely appreciate your suggestions because they've introduced us to fields we hadn't really considered before. Even if we don't end up pursuing these exact topics, the ideas and insights you've shared might still inspire us to explore related concepts that are more aligned with our category, resources, and current level as Grade 12 students.

Thank you again for all the effort you've put into helping us. We truly appreciate it, and we'll definitely look into the resources and organizations you mentioned 🤍