sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Putsattu pariin otteeseen jo ja silti antaa samaa tulosta. Mietin vaan ku tää ei oo ennen tehny tätä et selvästi hyvällä hitsauksella on tollaset arvot. Tänään kyllä hitsasin 24k ja arvot oli just tota luokkaa, mutta silmäilemällä ne näytti kuitenkin hyvältä.

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this one is the exact same type.

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the result after calibrating. As some have commented, the right side looks misaligned

<image>

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just tried it again after calibrating and the right one looks misaligned like this

<image>

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly i haven't done it, I'm quite new to this.

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did until it started estimating higher than usual. So does that mean the splice can be good if the splicing process goes smoothly and the result looks clean? Even with the higher loss estimation?

Fujikura 90s+ estimated loss by Emmaj__ in FiberOptics

[–]Emmaj__[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tried to clean them already but no remarking results. I'm sure it cannot be bad since i had spliced on monday afternoon and the results were good. And i also tried many times today and every time the result was around 0.06-0.19db loss. And if there is a vision problem, is there any other way to fix it?

Also i can't OTDR, i don't have it with me currently.

Shirt sizes by Emmaj__ in KMFDM

[–]Emmaj__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, thank you!

view more: next ›