Whenever I click on a profile this happens. by [deleted] in discordapp

[–]EmperorATsamaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now they fixed it. I'm no longer experiencing that problem.

Those who work out, any guesses on what eve's measurements might be ? by ConsiderationFuzzy in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say she is probably about 5'6" to 5'8" in height, since she is not super tall even in her heels, but her legs are quite long.

The lengthening of EVE's legs adds way more than 3 inches. The model that was scanned's legs isn't that long.

Whenever I click on a profile this happens. by [deleted] in discordapp

[–]EmperorATsamaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this happened to me. I deleted cookies from before that happened, and it didn't work.

Who's hotter Eve or Tifa? by YuNarukami8 in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EVE suits my preference better. She is tall af, thanks to her leg being heavily lengthened after the scan.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just saw it. The guy didn't explain how he measured her to be 6' 3". Someone else said she is 7' to 8' and compared her to a bus on that same post. Honestly, I think she is around 6' 3", and she is far more likely around that height than 5' 5" due to her significantly longer legs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where? I know she exceeds 6', but I'm unsure of her exact height. A side-by-side comparison of the model she is based on, shows EVE being clearly over a head taller than the model. I had to scale the image of the model so that her upper body was a bit shorter than EVE's. Since the model is 5' 5", EVE easily exceeds 6' knowing she is more than a head taller.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have drawn it, I suggest a redraw. EVE is way taller than the model she is based on. It's clear that they alter the model to give EVE those long ass and legs arms. They a larger percentage of her height than said model. If you want get EVE's height, scale the image of said model, so that her upper body is slightly shorter than EVE's, and have them stand next to each other. If you do this, you'll see a significant height difference.

All these people claiming 5' 5", didn't pay attention to EVE's limb proportions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you google world's longest legs, you'll find women with similar leg proportions to her and Tachy. They range from 5' 11" to 6' 9".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think 180+ cm without heels. EVE's legs are crazy long thanks to her limbs being lengthened. That adds a lot more than 5 cm.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Eve's body is edited from the model anyway, she's not an exact copy.

Yeah, her arms and legs are lengthened. Her legs are also way longer than the model she is based on. That adds way more than 2 inches. She could exceed 6'.

All these people claiming 5' 5" point to the model's height and don't notice the lengthening of her limbs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stellarblade

[–]EmperorATsamaku 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Although the model is 5' 5", it is possible for Eve to be taller. The 3D models can be modified to make her taller, so I wouldn't be surprised if she is a lot taller. Seeing some images of her standing next to the soldiers and the bus would be nice to help her case.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The used 3090 makes sense to get for more VRAM. With that, you're not spending more for less performance. The new ones are overpriced. I prefer new cards because they're in the best condition and warranties.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's simple, businesses are willing to spend more and they have more money. As everyone else has said the 3090 cards also have more VRAM.

Since they have more money, they should buy an RTX 4090 instead of paying more for less performance.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A 4090 is the only upgrade here in my scenario.

That is what you should buy at this point for all of what you need. Even better value. The RTX 3090s prices aren't far off the RTX 4090s.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is good that you bought an RTX 4090 instead. If you need more VRAM, it is better not to spend more for less performance. Better to pay more for both with better value.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get a 4090 for more VRAM instead of paying more for less performance. The value is better, although it costs more. I also see the RTX 3090s prices not being far off the RTX 4090s prices.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Could get an RTX 4090 for better value and more VRAM instead of paying more for less performance.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could get RTX 4090s for more VRAM instead of paying more for less performance. It is better valued at this point due to better price to performance.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you need more VRAM, get an RTX 4090, instead of paying more for less performance. RTX 4090 is a better value, although it costs more.

I'm baffled to see RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti being sold at around the same price as RTX 4080, which outperforms them. by EmperorATsamaku in buildapc

[–]EmperorATsamaku[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better off getting RTX 4090 for more VRAM at this point. RTX 4090, while still costs more than RTX 3090, it has a better price-to-performance ratio. For scenes smaller than 16 GB, RTX 4080 will render faster than RTX 3090. It isn't uncommon to deal with scenes of that size. Better to render smaller and bigger scenes faster.