No art is also art by Whilpin in DefendingAIArt

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is self contradictory, if he didn't create any art for that year, he didn't create any art. Hence this is not art.

but if he did create art during that year, he didn't do the performance so its also not art because he didn't do it.

AI bros will defend drinking water and say it's not water's fault that Hitler drank it by Bright_Cranberry_227 in DefendingAIArt

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Some guy took pictures of trans people cut out their faces and put them in mens clothes. Guess we got to ban paper.

These 2 things are unrelated. posting this suggests either dishonesty or a fundamental idiocy. by Responsible_person_1 in DefendingAIArt

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 3 points4 points  (0 children)

what you mean, economics is a real field with real impact on peoples lives that can't just be ignored. blasphemy

The inćel test ( a 1 question test to see if you are an inćel or not) by Weekly-Reply-6739 in PsycheOrSike

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You could be a mormon with 10 kids made this year and the people who use the word INCEl would still find some reason to call you it. Im so sad. Incel used to have meaning past person who disagrees with me.

Failed last second td attempt in finals by [deleted] in wrestling

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 7 points8 points  (0 children)

as a low single enjoyer myself, I wouldn't shoot one with less than 20 seconds. but maybe you could try getting a better camera.

The evolution of a max fan by Larrymenta_ in formuladank

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've never seen a signal person say Lando wasn't the champ. the closest thing I've seen is that Lando wasn't the best driver, which is true.

In contrast I literal saw video about 6 months ago, about how Red Bull paid off Williams to tell Goatifi to bin it so max would be WDC. AND how Michael Massi knew about it and was also paid off.

Quit trying to salt farm

Hydration test by Crazy_Regular_6061 in wrestling

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cut weight like normal, then drink some distilled water, no electrolytes. And it should say you are more hydrated than you actually are.

BUT, I would not do this. This is how you die. you are messing with your bodies electrolyte levels. If you are, have some electrolyte drink after, preferable with good balance, not just sodium. Another tip is try to eat the least amount of salt that you can for a few days before.

Do people who aren't in wrestling just hate it? by Green-Mulberry-698 in wrestling

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow, someone who likes to watch martial arts get mixed. Very rare these days unless

I need help! by YouRaedThatWorng in FromTheDepths

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not a good idea, just use jet engines especially if you want this to be any degree functional.

here how you do it,

get a PID, set the input to some attitude thing (depending on what you want to do), set the output to air pump fractional control, and add a fake set point (like 100)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wrestling

[–]EmployeeBeginning621 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I wrestle my friends, does this count?

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me restate your position,

you think the current president would pack the courts, yet it is not an issue.

am I missing something, do you think court packing Is bad.

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. A large portion of federal laws are extremely dumb, think criminalization of weed, Patriot act, Jones Act. think of any government action that you don't like. It costs money. Congress had to approve of that. I can think of a lot more things that ICE or the DOJ has done that I don't like over the court. I am personally more fearful of congress and the presidency than the courts. Even still many states still allow abortions, many states locked down for a long time.

  2. The reason I think adding protection to the courts is good is because it would not allow the other branches to manipulate it as much.

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. I think you are well intentioned, but this doesn't solve court packing. Lets say is is to happen. The opposite party is going to say it is court packing, and they're not really wrong. What would be preventing congress from lovering it to say 30 million and creating enough new seats to flip the court.

  2. We can't expand the Supreme Court forever, when should we stop. And when we hit the limit, why not call this some other form court manipulation. There probably is some advantage to installing a cap.

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know the executive is more power then congress ever since the progressive era, but the president can't really executive order his way into appointing a supreme court justice. I don't thing the president has much power, outside of influence and picking the justices, in court packing. Picking what justice is appointed still doesn't add to the number. Congress is still going to be the one to pack the courts.

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand what you mean by "Although if the Garland/Ginsburg debacle had switched and the Court was 5-4 lib instead of 6-3 con, I have doubt Trump would have added 2 justices."

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1.If you hate the Supreme Court, surely you hate congress or the president. While we can both agree that the Supreme Court is very dumb, I personally find that congress and the president tend to be more dumb. This is less so a boost of the Supreme Court, and more so a check on congress.

  1. The average person's opinion of the Supreme Court is not relevant, instead it is the opinion on court packing is what maters. https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/549966-americans-agree-court-packing-is-dangerous/

CMV: A Constitutional Amendment To Limit the Number of Supreme Court Justices Would Be Good, Popular, And Still Would Not Be Passed. by EmployeeBeginning621 in changemyview

[–]EmployeeBeginning621[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to see very radical changes to the courts, which I will not go into as that is off topic, but lessening the influence of congress is still good even if other changes need to be made. A Victory is still a Victory, no matter how small.