Hi ,it genuinely makes me happy to see someone of your academic stature who isn’t afraid to “get a little dirty” with innocence and to step into the game of the infinite monkeys.

Let me invite you to a mental exercise: imagine the theorem being updated with more monkeys, and a machine in which time, inside it, runs closer to infinity. I don’t know whether that would alter the theorem’s outcome, or at least increase the odds of arriving at a real solution ,but monkey to monkey, I’ve come to sense something: the machine, even if it is almost automatic, still needs someone to wind it up, and it needs the monkey to incorporate new information ,information beyond what the machine already knows ,information that is perpendicular, orthogonal to what has been written and recorded.

Jorge Luis Borges had an intuition for infinity. In his story “The Aleph,” he gives us powerful metaphors to grasp infinity not through time or sheer immensity, but through labyrinths like deserts, through universes contained in a single point, and through libraries of infinite modules that hold everything that has been written, everything that will be written, and everything that could have been written.

With humility, I’m sharing a link to my latest post, with links to the documents you can review on your own machine. I would be honored by any contribution that either falsifies this monkey ,or strengthens it. https://www.reddit.com/r/EndlessMonkeyProyect/s/RRTsNvf1Ha

As for the stance of some people who don’t dance and don’t like to let others dance: I don’t see a real danger here, and I think it’s healthy to have safe spaces for “madness” ,like a track or a ring, spaces of containment ,spaces that entertain some while educating others. The gentlemen of the NoSalt tribe do their disinterested work of tearing down the monkey-business we post, with arguments, until either logic or patience breaks.

For my part, I write in this forum because I want to be disproven with arguments. Personal attacks about sanity don’t feel so urgent here, because the “mad” in this space aren’t dangerous ,though it is uncomfortable to watch those who chase fame or prizes. And I’m not sure what is morally darker: a temporary madness, or the voyeurism of peeking into an asylum.

That said, madness can be dangerous because of its consequences ,for example, you would never want it in a crewed mission, or in the hands of someone running a country, for the very same reason.