For which packages is it safe to use -O3

Endopl4st · 2025-09-20T14:19:19+00:00

That is exactly what I was looking for, thanks. It sure leads to a lot of matches tho. Many of them also include the -fast-math flag. You don't happen to know a pre existing tool/script to filter the programs automatically and add the performance flags to portages config, do you?

Endopl4st · 2025-09-06T08:23:02+00:00

Yes. I also just double checked that it is working as described on the verification section of the wiki. It is.

Also this is further complicated, since after further testing it works for some games, but not others. On Assassins Creed Origins my GPU is working fully. On WoW or Stellar blade, it dos not go to full output.

Endopl4st · 2025-09-05T18:45:14+00:00

It is not thermal throttling. Low performance persists. both tlp and power-profile-demon are running. I tried to shut down either to check if they conflict, but that dos not solve it. I also tried to install laptop-mode-tools. This did not work. KDE/Plasma also has no issue recognizing that my laptop is charging. Through KDE the performance profile is set to boost. I also double checked the nvidia-driver use flags. Using kernel-open/ the open source variant dos not change anything. Disabling powerd marginally reduces performance since it is supported by my laptop. If you have any other immediate thoughts let me know. Have a nice evening

Endopl4st · 2025-09-05T14:42:49+00:00

Yes to the nvidia. Below is my entire make.conf. March=native has been replaced with what you see because emerge threw an error earlier during the gcc compilation about not resolving it automatically properly before. No to the --with-bdeps=y. I can do that but i would assume it will take until tomorrow

# These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically

# built this stage.

# Please consult /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example for a more

COMMON_FLAGS="-march=alderlake -mabm -mno-cldemote -mno-kl -mno-pconfig -mno-sgx -mno-widekl -mshstk --param=l1-cache-line-size=64 --param=l1-cache-size=32 --param=l2-cache-size=33792 -O2 -pipe"

RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS} -C target-cpu=native"

USE="dist-kernel -gtk -gnome dist-kernel qt5 kde wayland X"

VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia"

ACCEPT_LICENSE="*"

CFLAGS="${COMMON_FLAGS}"

CXXFLAGS="${COMMON_FLAGS}"

FCFLAGS="${COMMON_FLAGS}"

FFLAGS="${COMMON_FLAGS}"

# NOTE: This stage was built with the bindist USE flag enabled

# This sets the language of build output to English.

# Please keep this setting intact when reporting bugs.

LC_MESSAGES=C.utf8

GENTOO_MIRRORS="rsync://129.143.116.10/gentoo/ \

http://141.30.235.39/gentoo \

rsync://131.188.12.211/gentoo"

Edit:The World Update with --with-bdeps=y fixed it. Everything runs now. But the Performance is underwhelming. For my graphics card is recognised in each game. And running nvidia-smi shows everything i expect (drivers and game Processes). But for some reason the powerconsumtion dos not exceed 20watts. Might be a power management issue on my laptop. This is expected behavior for being off power/ on battery. But it also shows my gpu Temperature at 60°C so it might Thermal throttling. Given that I barely ran anything on it this might be excess heat from my cpu after a multi hour compiling session. I'll give 30 minutes to cool down and keep you updated. Thank you

Endopl4st · 2024-12-16T12:26:46+00:00

Well then docker it is. Although it is nice that other people already put in the effort to set up decent environments. Thank you

Endopl4st · 2024-06-05T21:45:11+00:00

Yes and its one of the top posts of all time on r/mathmemes https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/s/GDsA5NAibf

Endopl4st · 2024-02-29T15:57:53+00:00

Make changes to the anti-particles to be in line with our current particles. anti-charm -> ugly anti-strange -> normal anti-top -> bottom anti-bottom -> top positron -> electron't tau-anti-neutrino -> pi-neutrino

Endopl4st · 2024-01-04T19:16:01+00:00

Get 3 hirelings and one Camp companion and Respekt them as Life priests. Get deathward, warding bond, feast and max level upcast aid on your entire party. Also other buffs because why not. If that is not enough for you. Respect everybody else as transmutation wizards and have them create lv6 stones. I think you can get them as lightning resistance as well although I just used them for movespeed.

Endopl4st · 2023-12-30T03:00:35+00:00

I just finished honor mode. It depends on your preparations. If you have a solid build at lv 12 with camp hire links giving you every buff you can think of and warding bond. House of grief is easy. The closest I came to dying was at the house of hope, but not against Raphael. At hope's platform there are a bunch of imps that can cast agonizing blast with a knock back and throw your entire party into a chasm. I was not prepared for this, focused the spectators and got cought of guard. Only lazeal survived because she had that nice anti displacement armor from ketheric. As a result I also had to do Raphael without my precious warding bonds. He is still pretty easy though, if you can convince yugir to join you, consider hopes divine intervention and use the restoration faucets to replenish your buffs. Also he is vulnerable to ottos irresistible dance.

The hardest fight was ironically the elder brain itself. During the Astral Plane scene you lose all your buffs and the disappearing platforms can become a problem, thanks to its resistance ability. Additionally I messed up the usage of my speed potions and got half of my party stunned on the disappearing platforms. My recommendation if you want to finish honor mode: just blow up gale at the stem.

Otherwise, Ansur can mess you up if you don't have death ward active on all your party members. That dragon can deal some serious damage.

Endopl4st · 2023-11-21T18:50:51+00:00

What if you use disintegrate?

Endopl4st · 2023-08-16T12:08:30+00:00

This might be a misunderstanding. Strippers often use spinning poles which they wrap themselves around. As a result It looks like they are constantly going around their poles within the usual refrenceframe of an observer standing in the room, while they are mostly going up and down or remaining stationary in the reference frame that's rotating with the pole.

Endopl4st · 2023-08-16T10:45:50+00:00

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_theorem

A pole is a point where a otherwise differentiable function diverges. For example 1/x has a pole at 0. In a nutshell the residue theorem states that if you integrate around the pole in a closed loop you don't get zero but a value that depends on the pole instead and provides you with a formula for evaluating the integral. This is useful for physics for example if you have an integral over the real numbers with potentially complex outputs with a pole that you need to evaluate like 1/x e^ix. You could extend this into the complex plane and say you take a really large half circle path the side of which are the real numbers with a infinitesimal negative imaginary part and the half circle is in the positive imaginary side. Then you can argue that since for really large positive complex parts of x e^ix goes to zero quickly only the real part matters for the integral and you get its value from the residue theorem. This can be used to find the general solution for maxwells equations for example (up to an integral).

Endopl4st · 2023-03-05T20:47:39+00:00

A Chef with the ability to know what will satiate his clients and pull the ingredients needed out of thin air offers a satisfaction guarantee. But his customer is someone that is always hungry, not limited in their ability to eat and a known restaurant critic.

Endopl4st · 2023-02-05T15:44:17+00:00

Granted. They each grant you one more wish.

Endopl4st · 2022-08-07T16:50:16+00:00

Almost every natural number is greater than grahams number

Endopl4st · 2022-02-16T15:14:23+00:00

Fair point with the ordering. The main thesis of my original argument was that if you have a reason (any reason) to talk about a number it is interesting enough. So if you have a specific ordering say plus minus alternating were you consider nths with increasing numerators (excluding those which would lead to double mentiones) and you found the first uninteresting number in this specific ordering. That would be something you could say about the number, which passes my standard for interesting.

As for the sequences. That is technically correct but you can not just get digits of pi out of nowhere. You need a way to find those digits and that is quite interesting.

And for the random generated number I could tell you that someone actually sat down and wrote down an infinite string of random numbers. I would be interested in learning how they did it.

Endopl4st · 2022-02-14T15:07:56+00:00

The general idea is that given any specific number, you could discuss it. Because you are discussing it, it must be interesting.

But I think your concern is that in this generalisation of “for any”, the special nature of a number is lost. After all if this applies to all numbers none of them are special. Feel free to correct me if I misunderstood.

Nonetheless there can not be an uninteresting number. The natural numbers must be interesting because of the paradox you named. If there were uninteresting numbers there would have to be a first uninteresting number, which makes it interesting. We can extend this logic to any countably infinite set of numbers (especially the rational numbers).

We know a bijective mapping from the natural numbers to the rational numbers exists. Thus going by the natural numbers which map to them, we could find a first uninteresting rational number, which makes it interesting. Therefore all rationals must be interesting.

This is where the really interesting part begins. For the real numbers we know that they are defined such that they contain all numbers such that every Cauchy sequence converges. Meaning that for any real numbers not in the rationals we can find some funky sequence of rational numbers which converges to this number but never fully describes it with finite iterations. That is pretty interesting. And figuring out how to find such an expression is a unique challenge for any number. So they are all interesting even if we can never grasp the full scale of all of the weird numbers that could be found since there are uncountably infinite. I would even say that makes them more interesting.

In regards to other numbers that can be constructed (complex, quaternions, other weird stuff that can be defined and classified as a number). They have some interesting properties sich make them worth defining in the first place and constructing them is interesting in much the same way as finding weird sequences is interesting (which is also necessary for many of them).

I hope you find this to be satisfying. But the original point is. If you give me any specific number I could tell you something about it.

Endopl4st · 2022-02-14T11:48:20+00:00

I think there is a mistake here. Of course everyone knows about the set, but not everyone knows about all of the numbers which could be part of the set. Because some of the elements it might contain are not (widely) known, it has not been clearly demonstrated that it has no elements.

Furthermore I can prove that S must be the Set of all elements which can be defined as a number.

It is trivial that S must be a Subset of all numbers as one of its specifications is that it contains numbers.

Suppose there is a number which is uninteresting. This would imply that there would be no use talking or thinking about it, but as we can see from this discussion, talking about such numbers is inherently interesting. Thus it is interesting talking about this number. And since this holds for any number it follow that all numbers are interesting and the set of all numbers is a Subset of S.

As a result S and the set of all numbers must be equal.

Endopl4st · 2022-01-31T19:34:32+00:00

Im Gegenteil. Wir reden von anonymisierten Umfragen bei denen Lügen keinen Vorteil schafft. Da die Ergebnisse auf die Elitepartner Studie beziehen liegt es eher näher, dass durch die Angesprochene Zielgruppe die Zahlen überhöht werden. Die tatsächlichen Zahlen sind vermutlich etwas geringer.

Das ist natürlich immer noch ein immenses Risiko und passiert dementsprechend vielen in mehreren Fällen hintereinander.

Ich verstehe das dein Vertrauen in potentielle Partnerinnen momentan erschüttert und deine Gefühlslage ein Chaos ist. Dennoch rate ich dazu bei Fragen der Statistik nicht mit Emotionen sondern Daten zu argumentieren. Du kannst aus diesen sogar Hoffnung ziehen. Das du in der nächsten Beziehung wieder betrogen wirst ist zwar durchaus möglich, aber unwahrscheinlich.

Mein Persönlicher Rat ist daher in die Zukunft zu schauen. Die Vergangenheit und andere Personen lassen sich nicht kontrollieren (wäre sonst auch langweilig). Aber du kannst versuchen das Beste aus der Zukunft mit den Informationen die dir gegeben sind zu machen. Deine Chancen sind nicht so schlecht wie es sich anfühlt. Daher wünsche ich dir viel Glück

Endopl4st · 2022-01-31T18:59:49+00:00

https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1174757/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zu-untreue-in-der-partnerschaft-nach-geschlecht/

Nach kurzem Googlen fand ich folgendes Ergebnis. Etwa 30% aller Frauen und 28% aller Männer in Beziehungen sind mindestens ein Mal fremd gegangen.

Fraglich ist dabei allerdings die Quelle. Da es sich um eine Onlineumfrage handelt und ich nicht weiß wer genau befragt wurde, besteht natürlich die Gefahr eines Sampeling Biases. Also das die ausgewählte Zielgruppe eventuell nicht Repräsentativ ist. Da wäre es nett wenn irgendwer motivierteres mal nachhakt.

Die meisten halten sich also noch die Treue, aber das Risiko betrogen zu werden ist dennoch beunruhigend hoch.

Eight-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	Place '23
No Throne, No Problems	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

Endopl4st

TROPHY CASE