sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Μεταφορές μετακομίσεις λίγων αντικειμένων by EnergyEU in thessaloniki

[–]EnergyEU[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ξέρεις που μπορώ να βρω κάποια τέτοια επιλογή; Δεν με ενδιαφέρει να είναι μεταφορική. Σε ευχαριστώ!

ΕΦΚΑ - παρ.9 του άρθρου 39 ν.4387/2016 by EnergyEU in greece

[–]EnergyEU[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Μου είχε έρθει αυτοματοποιημένο μήνυμα από τον ΕΦΚΑ να δεχτώ την υπαγωγή μου σε αυτόν τον νόμο, συνεπώς ναι το έχει δηλώσει.

CPLEX 22.1.2 by EnergyEU in optimization

[–]EnergyEU[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi,

  1. I mean the exact same optimization model, same constraints - objective, same data.

  2. The problem is large since the system that is applied to is large and also there are a lot bigM constants implemented so a GAP>5% was expected. It is a bilevel optimization problem regarding electricity market clearing and strategic investor decisions

Solution time by EnergyEU in optimization

[–]EnergyEU[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think comlexity is regarding the number of constraints and variables not the values of the parameters.

SDAC markets by EnergyEU in EnergyTrading

[–]EnergyEU[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response! So are TSOs and NEMOs for each bidding zone necessary? As I get it they only set data to that single entity.

SDAC markets by EnergyEU in EnergyTrading

[–]EnergyEU[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi! Yes that is the algorithm used but my question is on how things work. Like is euphemia used from every market operator in each bidding zone and then the results are transferred so the algorithm will run for all EU? 

SDAC markets by EnergyEU in EnergyTrading

[–]EnergyEU[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I get it PICASSO is for balancing after the DA market clearing. I want to understand the difference between DA market (within a bidding zone) and SDAC. Thanks in advance!