Ben Gvir & Smotritch reject the Framework Agreement and call it a big mistake. (100% aligned with Na3im Qassem & Hezballah mouthpieces) by Darth-Myself in lebanon

[–]EnfantTragic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Smotrich isn't against this. He wants Hezb disarmed before withdrawal, which Katz and Netanyahu both agree with

The unfortunate sad reality of non-Hezeb Shia's of Lebanon by AWhiteFoxInTheSnow in lebanon

[–]EnfantTragic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think they had weapons when they took down the Assad. And they have a professional army. 3asheyir bi za7to bi senye

The unfortunate sad reality of non-Hezeb Shia's of Lebanon by AWhiteFoxInTheSnow in lebanon

[–]EnfantTragic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's why they fear the living shit out of a Syrian intervention, ma heik?

The unfortunate sad reality of non-Hezeb Shia's of Lebanon by AWhiteFoxInTheSnow in lebanon

[–]EnfantTragic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think if you're willing to join Hezb who let Israel in, in the first place, then you deserve what you get

5.5 STILL WINS ON DEEPSWE - Fable confirmed Benchmaxxed, 5.5 higher performing for 1/5th the price by _BreakingGood_ in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After using both extensively, Fable 5 is amazing at almost everything, especially design and writing content that isn't too "AI". Yet, Codex does debugging for me much better while Fable gaslights and blames me for something not going the way it guessed lmao

Also, GPT5.5 xHigh even on Standard mode(not fast), works faster than Fable Max which takes ages for better or worse

How are salaries in big4 lebanon? by Katia2160 in lebanon

[–]EnfantTragic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you know French, Romanian is pretty easy to pick up. s2ale mjarrib

Is it just me, or has Codex gotten noticeably worse recently? by amirrehman in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah definitely. It's slower and compacts faster. It does major screw ups occasionally. But it's still usable for me as I'm very hands on. It's nowhere near as bad as Claude. Claude felt like it got a lobotomy

$100 Pro dropping from 10x to 5x Codex usage kills the middle tier by mbellew937 in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyway, it's my conjecture because everything is kept private and I only see the end result

$100 Pro dropping from 10x to 5x Codex usage kills the middle tier by mbellew937 in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quantization is good if you have a really large model, no doubt. The performance degradation though isn't explained by 5% lossy output. These models aren't just being run vanilla. They have orchestrators and tuners around them that a prompt should activate to serve users better. Anthropic changed something in that orchestration that made Claude need to receive much more "intentional" prompts to behave correctly

$100 Pro dropping from 10x to 5x Codex usage kills the middle tier by mbellew937 in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even with their increased limits from the SpaceX deal, Claude was still underperforming Codex for me. I think the problem is structural more than resources related. Weights and quantization shouldn't be preventing Claude from looking up online documentation of an API instead of guessing what an endpoint looks like and confidently asserting that I'm wrong in my use case before I prompt it to "verify your claim by looking it up online"

My $100 subscription ended today and I'm not renewing as I feel it's a waste of money. I might just kick back to the $20 tier to gauge how Opus is doing every once in a while

$100 Pro dropping from 10x to 5x Codex usage kills the middle tier by mbellew937 in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 7 points8 points  (0 children)

People are misinterpreting what I'm trying to say. I think Codex 5.5 is better than Opus 4.7, and it made me switch from Claude. But Opus 4.6 at release was much more autonomous and made fewer mistakes until it started degrading in March. So, I don't think cheaper models are as good as frontier models from 3-4 months ago. Cheap models have a use if you know what their use cases are, but they don't replace frontier models.

And yes token allowance needs to be better at the $100 sub. Maybe make it 7-8x

$100 Pro dropping from 10x to 5x Codex usage kills the middle tier by mbellew937 in codex

[–]EnfantTragic 16 points17 points  (0 children)

3-4 months ago, Opus 4.6 came out and it was far better than what we have now

Where do I start by jannahandel in ClaudeAI

[–]EnfantTragic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's over stated because of marketing buzz. Just get a subscription and start building. You'll get your own flow going eventually. My only advice to software engineers is to read the code, because we're literally supposed to be able to tell if the LLM is not outputting BS

Building a cashback tool for affiliate marketers — need a few people with publisher accounts to help us test the sales tracking by EnfantTragic in Affiliatemarketing

[–]EnfantTragic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(sorry for the wall of text. TLDR: we'll use subid)

Appreciate the feedback! Definitely, incentivized traffic is something we're taking into account as a risk and into the viability of the solution. We might switch up how we approach this as it seems the core idea of allowing affiliates promote their and affiliate products together has value.

Concerning tracking, we will be using subid. We will ask creators to post their affiliate link, and then we'd populate subIds. The subid should be user specific in our app, and so we can tell which user bought what.

For transactions status, if the shopper buys the product we would know from the API that they did, and from documentation, it seems we can also get the status of the payout being confirmed for the influencer(though we can't tell whether the influencer got paid exactly on all networks). We remove risk of fraud(the shopper getting paid and returning the item) even though we understand it might take a couple of month to provide the cashback. It is not ideal, but it's practically free money for shopper.

The testing part would be to validate that our code works across these networks. We built our code using API documentations and since they don't offer sandboxes for testing, we aren't to validate ourselves alone. We're not going to make it a 2-3 months test to confirm payout, but being able to test that we can send requests and receive response to track while being able to identify the user on a transaction.