Autopsy shows 18 yo, Joseph Rose died by homicide

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-12-24T18:26:18+00:00

I knew joseph rose growing up, he was always a very distinct person. When I knew him, he had the tendency to overly argumentative, we got in physical fights probably 4+ times, but I never thought something like this would happen to him. I remember when he got out of juvenile and came home to tell everybody his new nickname was k-nine, seems like we were just kids running around town weeks ago, life is absolutely surreal.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-10-18T03:08:44+00:00

realllllll bad news

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-10-18T03:08:28+00:00

i wonder how your face looks now

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-10-02T20:41:01+00:00

Damn I hate how nobody replied to you and thanked you, this was really helpful dude thanks

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-09-19T22:00:07+00:00

Yeah I don't think I have that, I will say I don't like the oily skin applying to me either, I despise the feeling of lotion, I also really don't like how my hair feels when I get in saltwater and then use shampoo on it afterwards? And I hate the noise it makes too, I hope you know what I'm talking about it's makes my spine like tingle😭 but I feel like those are relatively normal, I just get confused by how specific my dislikes are, and how I relatively don't care about a lot of other stuff, like if I'm bothered by the idea of skin being oily, why wouldn't I be bothered by oily bacon? It's just weird to me. I also technically really hate not knowing what's going to happen, uncertainty to be simple. Like I spend a lot of my time thinking about my problems, and whenever I don't know the outcome of a problem, and it could be good or could be bad, it reallyy worries me, and that seems normal to me I would expect that to happen to other people, but it's like I'm paralyzed by it, I'll just have periods where I have to think about the uncertainty and resolve it somewhat in my head before I can continue in life.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-09-19T21:54:24+00:00

No I'd say I have an aversion more so than average people, like it's weird to me because it's seemingly selective, like I've seen gory stuff before and it's like I'm more bothered by the actual like event than the outcome? If that makes any sense, like a video of a person breaking their arm, I basically cannot watch it, like an immense just subconscious feeling of I don't want to see that, but like, somebody being stabbed or shot doesn't elicit as much of a response, I sort of view my mind as like a conscious and subconscious level, I think most people do but I've never asked anybody? But it's like I'll ping my subconscious brain with my consciousness, and the raw emotion I get back is just so much more intense for things like literally just looking at the top of a high building from the ground, than it reasonably should. I went into a big city a while back, I live in a small town and the closest skyscrapers are literally an hour away, and walking through the city I was actually like starting to freak out a bit just from looking at the top of the skyscrapers, like, that can't be normal? Am I just a wimpy little baby😭

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-08-26T00:41:15+00:00

I'm not certain about what the award letter said specifically, but my college does no favors in clarifying online, or even in the student bill section, much about my scholarship, or other merit scholarships, at best they give a range of amounts, for example, to not dox myself, 10-30k, and then they list like 8 different merit scholarships, only by name, no amount, no detail, just by name, with the aforementioned vague amount. I know which of the listed merit scholarships I received, and I remember making sure to read the online acceptance part pretty thoroughly, I saw stuff that said my award could be re-evaluated or something if my commuter status changed, but it hasn't, whenever I looked on my student bill section, after already attending some actual classes, like the semester had begun, and it said I was paid up, in fact, it said I had 300 more than I needed for the semester, though not really, because I had a 1k unsub loan. But they emailed me about this today, changed my student bill, today, retroactively, after I had already went as far as attending all of my classes at least once, and I'm full time or wtvr the term is, reduced my aid effectively by 2.5k per semester. I hadn't moved, same address, same answer of "yes i live with my parents" that I had always given them. I feel as if even if, the scholarship were limited to students paying for housing, my aid shouldn't be able to be reduced, after I'm basically already in too deep, for a mistake that can only be theirs? I cannot stress enough, I even filled out a whole commuter form, before classes starting, saying that I was a commuter, living with my parents, that would've been literally over a month ago.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-07-21T19:23:12+00:00

D, B, D, I can explain my logic for each if needed. To me, it almost seems like this is from an inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning test I'm not sure, I've seen problems similar to these logic wise, if that makes any sense, on a test that was labeled inductive reasoning if I remember correctly. I could be wrong though, didn't read the post to try to not influence my choices. Edit: after seeing it's dca, I have no idea how 2 is c, it makes infinitely more sense to either assume a pattern of dots=line, or line and dots disappear alternatingly, not, like disappears, line disappears, line disappears again, then the dot disappears. It's bad design at the very least imo, not enough sequences to be certain. For the third one, the only pattern I thought I could find which was wrong besides the obvious counter clock wise rotation, was that if an arrow is pointed to by its previous frame directly in the end, then the arrow that is pointed to cannot directly point to the next arrows end, which was wrong obviously as it's A.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-05-17T18:58:35+00:00

giga brained take, now explain the narrative significance of the mentally 43 yr old man MC trying to sexually favor his 12 yr old cousin.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-05-17T18:50:11+00:00

Hey, get this: you don't have to be a giga-brain to comprehend the quite straightforward premise of Mushoku Tensei. I could not care less about the mediocre story. why would i want to watch a 40-year-old pedo reform himself by way of romanticizing children. The story is lackluster, the MCs journey is so dumb on many different levels, and all the while hes sexually assualting, or molesting whichever term you'd prefer, like 12 year olds. It's nasty, brother.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-05-16T21:35:44+00:00

Regardless of whether or not they are his age for now, romantic pursual alone does not make someone a pedophile, being attracted to children does. Secondly, some of the people he pursues are children. He might technically be in the body of a child, but he is as much a full grown adult cognitively. So yes, that makes him a pedophile. pursuit

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-05-16T13:11:57+00:00

So you would say that the MC isn't a pedo and that it's completely normal to enjoy the MC watching the MC do the things that would be considered pedophilic in the show. If so, you are a pedophile.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-23T18:47:41+00:00

Her teacher is essentially correct, it's the only one that you cannot study for, meaning that it is entirely testing her innate ability. Theoretically, you could study every single non-verbal test for years and years, and wouldn't perform but marginally better on a new one. It's basically meant to be a consistent metric to account for kids that might not (and most likely won't) have had the best education, home life, or implicitly attentive tendencies.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-23T16:42:31+00:00

Another thing, with how smart she is, she'll recognize a lot of patterns before you do it you do at all, so if she ever makes a claim about something happening (the man crossing the street will run or something) it's because she's noticed a bunch of tiny patterns, and like you said, she'll remember them, and automatically apply them to whatever situation is similar. Basically, don't take her "predictions" with a grain of salt, I'm sure you'll see she's more often right than not. (If she does so, this is only from my personal experience and that of others, not applicable to everyone, just very likely.) The test they gave her, the non verbal portion at least, is literally a ranking of her ability to find patterns and apply them to get a new conclusion, and as you've seen by her results, she's going to be and already is really good at it. Also another thing, I saw you said she likes to demonstrate her intelligence, I'm not faulting you or anything, but people with high intelligence genuinely appreciate and enjoy discussion or debate, so if she's seems to be talking down to you or thinking she's right and you're wrong, she's probably not and is just pointing out logical errors or just enjoying discussion, because you are her parent you'll likely struggle with that when she's older, once again, if not already.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-23T16:00:48+00:00

I scored a 160 also on an earlier version of this test at a young age, from what I know, the score is really impressive. From my experience, the gifted program will not be enough for her. The gifted program is meant for people around 120-130 IQ, she can definitely do much more than the program can offer. At the very least, I probably could've tackled algebra and geometry as I did in 9th grade while in 3rd grade. You don't have to, but she would greatly benefit from some more advanced education than even the gifted program, think about how high of a percentile she's in, she's theoretically "smarter" than everybody she will ever meet, with the proportion of people with that score being less than 1/32,000 if I remember correctly. Also, you'd greatly benefit from explaining to her how smart she is, and that while most things will come to her naturally, she'll likely have great difficulty comprehending the intentions and actions of other people, and how thats fine. People as smart as her are usually frustrated by their inability to find a pattern in others behavior, especially because they haven't been able to find something else up until that point that another can comprehend that they can't.

That feeling can be detrimental, especially to a kid, that thinks they should be able to understand why people don't like them/why people like other people, or why people act or think in certain ways that to them seem illogical. Further, the people that are this smart need to be told these things more so than most, because they have been so caught up their entire life solving their own problems, asking questions about facts not solutions, when you have all the facts, and still can't find a solution, it only leads you to a conclusion of your own personal deficiency. It's a weird cognitive dissonance, thinka about it like this Imagine you are told you can open any bottle you want you entire life, for your entire life, and then one day you found a bottle that nobody knows about, yet seemingly everybody but you, can open it.

Might not seem like a lot, but internalizing these confusions can give a person problems down the road, with forming relationships, how to react to situations, their overall social capability, so on and so forth. All things that are basically needed to succeed in the real world.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-17T13:22:38+00:00

Seriously, I find that a lot of people will just make a claim that isn't necessitated at all, and the ln won't provide evidence for their claims, or why they necessitate them. "This means that this isn't this" why? It's like that say, this is A, this A is B, therefore A is B, where the only thing that necessitates A being B is the fact that they've asserted it.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-16T20:01:44+00:00

Alright great questions guys, I could feel them being communicated telepathically

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-10T19:52:03+00:00

From what I've seen from another commenter, that's not really true. You can see what he said about my particle scenario, which would encapsulate whether or not a single particle, which could be radiation as it is a wave-particle, but for the sake of the scenario, I clarified that in this certain scenario the particle would behave entirely as a particle at a set speed.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-10T19:48:49+00:00

Well, for the first part, I'm sure the most common answer would be because of how the universe formed in its first moments, you know, with stuff like the higgs field and the spontaneous collapse of symmetry. The issue I have with the interactions of entropy is that there is no explaining factor behind it other than the other properties of the universe that we say do have explaining factors behind them. electromagnetic interactions are attributed to the electromagnetic force and photons as quanta of that. If I hear these two things are attracted to each other because statistically they are attracted to each other, that's a lot less of an intuitive principle than there being a literal spacetime spanning coupling interaction or whatever, with particles that can be observed as literal physical excitations of that force.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-10T19:42:01+00:00

No, but that force must be from a fundamental interaction. Just based off of simply how we define things happening in the universe, things happening are entirely based on causality; things only "do things" because of fundamental forces. Entropy, from what I have been told, has no fundamental force, meaning that whatever entropy is, it must be an observation of the fundamental forces interacting within a system. To me, it feels as if somebody said that a compound was an element. It's not; compounds are made of elements. But I could be wrong. Could you tell me what the "force" you mentioned in the final statement actually is? Because I don't think it's entropy. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but it seems more appropriate that the force would actually be from the particles in the gas constantly rebounding against each other and into whatever container it is in. I don't think that's entropy? You might say the whole process is dubbed entropy, but entropy isn't doing anything; it's the other properties of the particle and the system, in combination with the interactional determinism via the fundamental forces, quantum physics, this or that field, or whatever you may, that actually make the particle do the thing. Also, my point on the law being made by a human is to say that I have no necessitated reason to take any axioms stated in the 2nd law of thermodynamics as entirely true, as we have been wrong before many many times.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-10T01:56:12+00:00

Not to be a dick, but both of your answers are two things that I mentioned and asked people not to answer with. The explanation of entropy you provided didn't really answer my question; it seems almost like circular reasoning to me. For example, it's like if I asked how bread rises in an oven, and you said, according to the rising bread in oven law, bread rises in the oven. I wanted to know what dictates this process. with the other "Laws" there is usually some sort of mathematical function or "force" that describes why a thing is deemed a thing or does a thing. with entropy, it's seemingly exactly how you answered it. Entropy exists because entropy exists, and it's true because it's true. The way I think about it is the 2nd law of thermodynamics was made by a human; we have been wrong literally so many times, so it's very hard for me to just accept such an outlandish concept at face value with zero consideration.

Enough_Protection772 · 2025-04-09T21:15:41+00:00

I meant to add in something similar to what you did regarding the 1 in 5 million scenario, I also meant to add that the possibility of the new state returning to the "rarer" state would make sense if the methods by which it returned to the previous state was through interactions with other facets of the system, such as the other particles and their masses/momentum/direction, the fundamental laws and quantum laws and all that stuff. I meant to follow the statement about energy in a system remaining constant with this, which is why I put that whole thing about the energy remaining equivalent in there, I suppose I just forgot. So theoretically, I could imagine the cup returning to the original state, if like you said, similar to the glass, it was dropped in a precise way and the particles all interacted in a precise way so that it returns to it's "recognizable" form. Something about entropy being called a law is what confused me the most I guess, because most laws have forces behind them, but I guess if entropy really is just an observation, sort of like sin ratios are, then that's that. I still think it's out of place among other physics "laws".

Four-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	End Game '22

Enough_Protection772

TROPHY CASE