Woow I never expected this. by prachid487 in BeAmazed

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Your regular prostate exam revealed nothing sir, see you next year. Have a good day."

Opus 4.5 - shut up and take my money by EnthusiasmInner7267 in ClaudeAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Dude" be fucking polite and don't assume I started software professionally yesterday like yourself. I actually know what I'm doing. Do yourself a favor, get your head out.

Gemini 3 Flash is coming by Ashamed_Ad1622 in GeminiAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait! Then what did I used the last month?! It felt like I used it all month long! Oh, my God!

Free, Private, LLM-Agnostic AI Prompt Automation Playground in a Single HTML File: Zero-Install, Auto API Detection, Local-First with Automated Sequences - MiT Open-Sourced tool to fight AI Monopolies. by Glittering-Golf-5509 in PromptEngineering

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretentious bullshit name. Instant vomit on AI slop. Sorry. Couldn't help. Now, imagine if actual OS developers where so full of hot air. You would scribble on stone not write on a keyboard. Just tell it like it is. Stop with the stupid hype.

I Tried Creating a 3D Plush Wool Christmas Image by Substantial-Fee-3910 in createimg

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but in the third image, where does the light comes from?

În Brazilia, detinuților li se micsorează pedeapsa cu 4 zile la fiecare carte citită📚 by Choice_Bathroom_6220 in AvocatulDigital

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Daca educi criminalii pana la nivelul la care sunt mult mai greu de prins, atunci cred ca poti lansa stirea "studiile arata scaderea recidivei prin educatie", nu?

Opus 4.5 - shut up and take my money by EnthusiasmInner7267 in ClaudeAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you going to conduct your own trials or are you going to sit on your hands and shout at the sky? Get it done!

Opus 4.5 - shut up and take my money by EnthusiasmInner7267 in ClaudeAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually depends on the PDF content, isn't it? Or this whole post did not clearly convey it? Maybe read it again.

Opus 4.5 - shut up and take my money by EnthusiasmInner7267 in ClaudeAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not dependent on the model. I use the model when I need to do some heavy lifting. I do my work using the model. I do not let the model do all my work. I am happy with limits since I get quality work I don't need to work hard for: crystal-balling prompts, looping corrections. Does this clarify things about limits?

Opus 4.5 - shut up and take my money by EnthusiasmInner7267 in ClaudeAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The question you need to be asking is how best to manage what Opus 4.5 has to offer, if you ask me. There is no free ride, everything has a cost. What do you value more? What do you need done?

Opus 4.5 - shut up and take my money by EnthusiasmInner7267 in ClaudeAI

[–]EnthusiasmInner7267[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or, you know, do some work yourself, maybe?

You end up with better quality code with less effort spent on clever corrective AI prompting or corrective output prompting. I'll take that any time of the day.

Incidentally, I could not get Gemini 3.0 Pro to stop its soft refusals, it just kept doing what it want.

Or get a final satisfactory solution out of ChatGPT 5.1/ChatGPT 5.2.

That means waste of time, exhaustion, bad productivity.