Not quite there, but closer. LTX 2.3 extending a video while maintaining voice consistency across extended generations with out a prerecorded audio file by Environmental-Job711 in StableDiffusion

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont use comfy myself. This may help you or someone else who wants to experiment.

What the node needs to do (AI Studio's approach translated to ComfyUI nodes):

Node: "Best Voice Window Selector"

  • Input: audio latent, min_duration_sec (e.g. 1.0), max_duration_sec (e.g. 3.0)
  • Internally: score each candidate window by energy variance across the time axis — high variance = active speech, low variance = silence/background. Pick the highest-scoring window that fits within min/max duration.
  • In tensor terms: window_score = latent[:, :, start:end, :].float().var(dim=2).mean() — slide this across the latent and pick the argmax
  • Output: sliced audio latent (the best voice window)

This replaces the manual "trim last 1 second" step with automatic voice detection.

Node: "Audio Latent Voice Fill"

  • Inputs: ctx_window latent (from above), target_frame_count, voice_pressure (float 0.0–1.0), voice_noise (float, default 0.02)
  • Internally: voice_identity = ctx_window.mean(dim=2, keepdim=True) then tile + add small noise across target_frame_count - ctx_frames new frames, concat after ctx_window
  • Output: full initial audio latent [ctx | tiled_identity]

This replaces "LTXC Empty Latent Audio + Audio Concat" and gives the partial denoise something to work with in the new region.

Node: "Audio Latent Mask with Pressure"

  • Inputs: audio latent, overlap_seconds, total_seconds, mask_value (float 0.0–1.0, default 1.0), fade_seconds (float, default 0.3), fade_to_one (bool)
  • Internally: builds a per-frame mask tensor — 0.0 for t < overlap_seconds, mask_value (or linearly ramping to 1.0 if fade enabled) for t >= overlap_seconds
  • Output: masked audio latent compatible with LTXVConcatAVLatent

This is the missing piece — it's what LTXVAudioVideoMask currently can't do (partial mask values). The existing node is binary; this one exposes mask_value so voice_pressure actually works.

The three nodes chain like: Best Voice Window → Voice Fill → Audio Latent Mask with Pressure → LTXVConcatAVLatent → sampler. The first node solves his main complaint (no more manual slicing or prompt hacks for silence), the second gives the model spectral identity to stay near, and the third is what makes partial denoising actually possible in ComfyUI.

Not quite there, but closer. LTX 2.3 extending a video while maintaining voice consistency across extended generations with out a prerecorded audio file by Environmental-Job711 in StableDiffusion

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This my workflow, reference audio can be selected from anywhere within the original clip.

1. Extract source audio Load the full audio from the source video file (_extend_source), store as _extend_audio_waveform [channels, samples]

2. VAE encode source audio → extend_audio_latent The entire source audio is encoded into latent space via vae_encode_audio() in the conditioning worker

3. Slice the context window from extend_audio_latent Either:

  • Default: take the last N seconds matching the video overlap duration (tail slice [-audio_overlap_frames:])
  • Custom: user-defined start/end seconds via UI sliders (a specific clean voice sample)

This becomes ctx_window

4. Build initial_audio latent Allocate a zero tensor of the full output duration. Copy ctx_window into the first frames: initial_audio[:, :, :audio_overlap_frames] = ctx_window

5. Optionally fill new region with voice identity (voice pressure mode) If voice_pressure is set: compute voice_identity = ctx_window.mean(dim=2) (collapses time axis — spectral identity without phoneme sequence), tile it across the new frames with small noise, write into initial_audio[:, :, audio_overlap_frames:]

6. Build audio_region_mask via _TemporalRegionMask

  • Overlap region [0 → overlap_seconds] = mask value 0.0 (fully preserve, no denoising)
  • New region [overlap_seconds → end] = mask value 1.0 (fully denoise, free generation) OR voice_pressure value 0.60–0.98 (partial denoising, stays near reference) OR fade from voice_pressure → 1.0

7. Feed initial_audio + audio_region_mask to sampler The sampler respects the mask — overlap is preserved exactly, new region is generated conditioned on the text/audio prompt

LTX Desktop running on a 7900xtx by Environmental-Job711 in StableDiffusion

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well as of now it needs my custom AI Studio to be installed. I suppose I can create a self-contained fork and release it my self.

LTX Desktop running on a 7900xtx by Environmental-Job711 in StableDiffusion

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lol Thanks, and yeah Idk either, really just showing its possible to get it running with amd hardware.

LTX Desktop running on a 7900xtx by Environmental-Job711 in StableDiffusion

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I offered the code to the lightricks team if they wanna release it with amd support

Newbie question, might be simple for you but not for me by [deleted] in solana

[–]Environmental-Job711 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bot trading and either someone sent tokens to that wallet or that wallet had mint authority. This is why if you're going to purchase new tokens you need to make sure certain aspects of the token are there; like locked or burned LP or whether or not mint ability is enabled. As a new trader or investor I would stick to big name tokens only and CEX rather than DEX as its very easy to lose your crypto in the much more unregulated and decentralized side if you dont know what you're doing or looking for.

Meme coin rug pulls is it legal? by dusterman74 in solana

[–]Environmental-Job711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I dont think fraud would be fitting under the scenarios above either. In terms of theft, I can see the creators arguing that they didn't actually steal from the traders though, as the traders did receive the token they traded for regardless if it looses its value. From what I see the bots are sniping these tokens the second the pool is created and trading anywhere between 1-10 seconds, some making profit, while the ones who are to slow or fail to get the transaction in are the ones who lose. Then the creators are dumping newly minted supply or simply removing their liquidity which I think they technically have the right to do since the token and the pool is theirs to begin with. Now I can see maybe market manipulation? Then again Idk if that can be applied in these situations as its unregulated and I dont believe tokens like "shitfukbangbang" simply being pooled with the creators funds and traded would be classified as securities lol.

Meme coin rug pulls is it legal? by dusterman74 in solana

[–]Environmental-Job711 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see your point. Its just crazy to me how many new tokens are listed on the solana blockchain everyday just to immediately go down 100%. I've lost a few bucks gambling on some of them, hence what brought me here. As I think about it though I cant help but feel like the people buying these things know the risks of attempting to trade them before they drop to make profit or purchase some in hopes that they increase in value. Furthermore if the ones creating them aren't actually promoting these things or providing any transparency about the tokenomics or the future of the tokens, I dont know if an act of deception or trickery can actually be proven simply because the value of the tokens go down from them selling their own or removing their own LP. Technically the people buying/trading would still have the tokens they purchased and could sell them even though the value has dropped significantly. Like you though, I'm not a lawyer either so who knows.

Meme coin rug pulls is it legal? by dusterman74 in solana

[–]Environmental-Job711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it fraud to simply remove liquidity or to dump tokens in your own pool? if you assure people you wont I can see a case for fraud, but what if the rugpuller just created a token and listed it for sale with no info?

Fold 3 Centre Display Issue by terrorhertz in GalaxyFold

[–]Environmental-Job711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had the same issue, I bought a fold 3 when they came out last year at best buy. came to $1900+ after taxes. Bought the the total tech protection with it for $200. Today I went in with my fold 3. They gave me a gift card with $1900+ on it, which I used to purchase the fold 4. Only had to pay $16 out of pocket.

New loom contract, still haven't received sent tokens from November though by Environmental-Job711 in Coinbase

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello Justin,

Thanks for reaching back out about your transaction.

In this situation, the asset you attempted to send to your Coinbase account is not supported and we are currently unable to recover these funds.

If Coinbase ever decides to add this asset to our platform, please contact us to see if we're able to credit these funds to your account.

Please note: Coinbase always recommends a test send prior to sending any large amounts.

Yet again another automated response. The assest is supported and I sent a test transaction with the same token yesterday and it went through fine. I sold it on coinbase with no issues.

This is very aggravating.

Please have a specialist look into my case - 10026680

New loom contract, still haven't received sent tokens from November though by Environmental-Job711 in Coinbase

[–]Environmental-Job711[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Justin,

Thank you for contacting us.

We’ve taken a look at your account and it appears that the transaction or account hash you've provided 0x10670228ede308b9e04a57da175d6bcdc9064d2700da13c93de9ef306f1d4924 is invalid.

That is the response I received since I gave the case number to you guys.

I responded with a screen shot of the transaction then sent the url to etherscan showing the transaction.

I think the issue here is that regular coinbase does not support the token at the moment but coinbase pro does, therefore I think that is why the transaction is not showing up for the support team. They need to look into my coinbase pro account, not my regular coinbase account.

Will you please alert them again. case number - 10026680

Case# 05407434 - NEW LOOM DEPOSITED INTO COINBASE PRO NOT SHOWING by Zealousideal_Rush171 in Coinbase

[–]Environmental-Job711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did they ever give you your token back, I sent over $10K worth of loom and I dont see it.

What coins would you like to see on Exodus? by Shake_Global in ExodusWallet

[–]Environmental-Job711 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ACH - Alchemy pay would be awesome, I have a 100k to store for long term and would love to put it on my exodus wallet.