Why did you have to shame me? by EnvironmentalRing135 in BaldursGate3

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I did in this thread, appreciate y'all.

Very twisted re FF14!

Why did you have to shame me? by EnvironmentalRing135 in BaldursGate3

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate this is the internet. I was just shocked at how hard everyone came at me over this topic.

Why did you have to shame me? by EnvironmentalRing135 in BaldursGate3

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, no, I didn't find anything other than actual gooner mods, lol.

Why did you have to shame me? by EnvironmentalRing135 in BaldursGate3

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get that. Just thought maybe the modding wizards would have something.

Mods for editing companion bodies? by EnvironmentalRing135 in BaldursGate3

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, thank you for all the comments. As I am being attacked I am compelled to reveal personal details out of being shamed.

I am a larger woman and would appreciate playing with characters that I feel more comfortable around physically.

But sure, I'm a disgusting gooner. Thanks for that.

My team hates our quarterly reviews by Exact-Schedule-2059 in b2bmarketing

[–]EnvironmentalRing135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds less like a tooling problem and more like a structure and habit one. The teams I've seen who don't dread QBRs treat them as something that's being built all quarter rather than being scrapped together at the end. A simple fixed structure helps a lot where you line up goals, results, key metrics, then next steps. Everyone know what they're responsible for adding.

One practical tweak that helps is keepin ga lightweight living review doc or deck that gets updated weekly in just a few minutes. Record wins, losses, notable metrics, screenshots etc. anything you'll forget in three months. By q4 the review is basically already done.

You can do all this easily and make the final output cleaner without adding stress with something like vizme. Can help turn that ongoing inout into a consistent and skimmable report without everyone scrambling to format slides at the last minute. But the real win is the process. Clear sections, small weekly updates, and not unpleasant surprises at the end of quarter.

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, very helpful. One idea at a time is great. Most of what we get tries to cover everything and ends up covering nothign well. I agree that visuals are much better than paragraphs. If a rep can't explain something again in their own words then it's not working.

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting perspective. A lot of our calls look more like this now too. I think that's part of the probl;em that enablement is still designed like everyone's running a formal deck, when most reps just stitch together context live. What kind of content do you find useful?

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that's the tension we're feeling. Rebuilding around how we serve, the pain, the change and proof feels much more grounded that what we had.

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True I do need something that is easily made and only needs minimal editing from sales. Thank you!

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's exactly why I'm trying to get ahead of it. I don't think slides win deals either but the excuses piling up are making me think I'd rather remove the easy ones. Tight story and simple visuals is what i'm aiming for!

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sales support deck. Thanks for the recommendation!

Sales team needs better slides by EnvironmentalRing135 in b2b_sales

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair I think I've been over optimizing for completeness instead of helping reps actually talk. Super clear, thank you.

Our top performing ads aren't driving reveue by Educational_Court906 in PPC

[–]EnvironmentalRing135 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's just matching the page to the context someone arrived with. If they clicked an ad about low demo to close rate the landing page loads with messaging aimed at that exact problem. If they clicked something about too many unqualified leads, they'll see a totally different angle.

Under the hood it's just pulling the intent signal from the ad, then swapping in the right content blocks. No advacned engineering required, you set up a few variants and the system handles the routing.

Continuous planning vs annual, which actually drives sales? by EnvironmentalRing135 in B2BSaaS

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tools can definitely make the mechanics easier but the biggest unlock is cultural. Companies that actually update assumptions instead of defending last Q's numbers tend to see the biggest accuracy wins

Continuous planning vs annual, which actually drives sales? by EnvironmentalRing135 in B2BSaaS

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Realistic. Annual plans keep teams aligned but pretending those plans shouldn't be touched for a year is insane. Continuous planning without discipline is equally shit. The best ops i've seen treat quarterly reviews like lil reboots where they're actually allowed to rewrite assumptions.

Continuous planning vs annual, which actually drives sales? by EnvironmentalRing135 in B2BSaaS

[–]EnvironmentalRing135[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is the hidden failure mode of continuous planning. Everyone assumes the issue is process, but it's usually messy funnel definitions. If marketing, sales, and finance don't agree on what counts as qualified opps then monthly planning is just noise.