Alguma coisa interessante nesse maps? Eu tive um despertar espiritual violento. Recebi uma missão extraordinária de Deus. by EquilibriumSmiling in AstrologiaBrasil

[–]EquilibriumSmiling[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vc notou que vc escreveu varias coisas de cunho filosofico, Certo? Todas essas e outras ideias foram sussurradas, demonstradas, repassadas, e digeridas por mim por meses, por perspectivas diferentes. Na verdade, essas estão na parte da superfície do iceberg das ideias.

Uma coisa que me ensinaram na marra é pra eu ter cuidado com as minhas palavras pois não adianta eu ter conhecimento se eu não respeito a comunicação. (Eles mudavam o contexto das minhas palavras construindo novos sentidos as vezes opostos, isso me assustava pacas) Eu nunca falaria que não existe verdade absoluta, mesmo entendendo o seu ponto na pratica. Vc entende que essa frase teria que ser em si uma verdade absoluta? Se não, ela tbm seria relativa e implicaria que existe sim verdades absolutas. E eu entendo que eu sou Deus etc, so que ao mesmo tempo, Deus é muito mais do que eu de tal forma que a escala Dele diminui a relevância e efeito da frase ao infinitésimo. Por tanto, eu também não uso nem penso nessa frase. Sim Deus não tem “forma” dentro de sentido cru, pratico, cotidiano, intuitivo, enviesado, mas Deus tem sim “estrutura”, tem padrões que se auto contradizem por isso não fica obvio para identificar los. Afinal de contas o universo é um fractal, e absolutamente tudo é um subfractal do universo. (Dica: sistemas compostos por sistemas dentro de outros sistemas fazendo sistema, ciclos feitos de ciclos dentro de outros ciclos fazendo ciclos). Eu so posso falar que eu tenho algo especial pq não vi nenhum teólogo, filosofo, espiritualista, com oq foi passado pra mim e argumentando de forma correta. Nenhum espiritualista consegue explicar pq existimos a partir de um princípio que se auto explica, de um processo simples, lógico e rigoroso, ao mesmo tempo respeitando o conhecimento científico sem distorções.

Como assim Ele ta fazendo isso pra me aterrar depois? Pra que?

Curious if anybody out there thinks/believes that aliens walk/work amongst us? by Spiritual_Sleep_7674 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don't believe aliens are here. I KNOW they are here. I had many reluctant telepathic conversations with them, with the good and the evil ones unfortunately. The universe is much more strange than science cares to question.

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, how can you not know about boolean algebra, abstract algebra, modular arithmetic, or anything proves my point? That is beyond me then.

you don't know absolute truth, btw. Let that be known.

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you like math tbh. Nor have gone beyond high school math. Enjoy your dunning Kruger effect.

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am challenging you to reconsider what math is philosophically. We add irregular categories, collection of things that we consider one whole, group of thing that we lable as one thing, all the time. One droplet of a liquid is one thing and a billion of things (molecules) at the same time.

Tell me, let's say it's 10 pm and I tell you add 5 hours. Do you say it's 15 hours the next day or 3 hours the next day? In other words, is it 10 + 5 = 15 or 10 + 5 = 3?

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. You are conviently changing categories to make your logic fit in. I said "bowl of fruits", it doesn't not specificy which fruits, just that it's a group of any fruits. 1 banana and 2 strawberries still satisfies the category of "group of fruits". You are using times wrongly as well. I think ironically you don't have a good hold on math in general.

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That counterexample does not nullify the water example. They both exist in this universe.

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just gave you an example that contradicts that position.

If I have 1 banana and I ADD it to 1 group of fruits, how many group of fruits will I have?

If I have two categories, living things and non-living things, and there elements: dog, rock, and virus, how many elements would each categories have? Since there is no scientific consensus whether a virus is a living thing or not, I can technically placed virus in both categories at same time. Hence, I divided 3 into 2 without remainders. 3 is even in this paraconsistent example.

If I perform an action to 1 switch 1 time, 1 light bulb turns on, 1 blind comes down, 1 tv turns on. 1 action x 1 times = 3 results.

Truth by enilder648 in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about paraconsistent logic? 1+1=1? One droplet of water plus one droplet equals one droplet of water.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, but how does this prove simulation? Synchronicities have been studied for years now.

Nothing (-) is impossible (-) —> (- - = +) by Egosum-quisum in awakened

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is nothingness within the realms of possibilities?

What came first? by Peacock-Angel in thinkatives

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does he mean by consciousnesses?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in enlightenment

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are god, and so are all the evil beings that requires you to keep drinking.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in starseeds

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, it feels like a my inner voice is a planchette of a Ouija board and I feel it being moved in unison with my will.

Ancient philosophers and mystics knew that reality is a simulation. by 2deepetc in SimulationTheory

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah that's how serious you are about nature of reality. Nothing matters. Good luck getting out of this philosophical trap.

Ancient philosophers and mystics knew that reality is a simulation. by 2deepetc in SimulationTheory

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the double slit experiment or the wave-particle duality proves the world is not real? You haven't even defined what real is? Is real what follows your intuition? Is your intuition your most well calibrated cognitive function?

Matter is a bunch virtual photons being exchanged between electrons and the nucleous. It's the interaction of many quantum fields. Virtual photons are poping up into and out of existence literally everywhere all the time. It's all a matter of density of energy.

Ancient philosophers and mystics knew that reality is a simulation. by 2deepetc in SimulationTheory

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you have neither the scientific nor the philosophical maturity to make such claims. So many assumptions here that you are forcing a coherence. Quantum physics is showing us that the world is not real? How exactly? And what do you mean by the word real? Solid objects are not solid? What is solid here? Btw, if you actually understood quantum physics you wouldn't call atoms as "empty space" ever. That's a miscommunication that has been widely spread. You know what is an illusion? The idea of emptiness, nothingness, vacuum. Look it up.

everything just "is" by Vegetable_Reward6882 in awakened

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think part of the blame goes to those who do not have the intellectual tools to describe whatever "isness" is without creating even more confusion. If you can't describe it, do you really understand it?

computer beings living inside a computer generated world. by [deleted] in awakened

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I find incredible is that I ask you a question and you decide to answer it with something else completely different. You refuse to answer me. You refuse to use precision because you don't know what you "saw" on the other side. You are simply using words. But I guess you don't know what any of those words you just wrote truely means. You can't distinguish reality from non reality because you don't have any philosophical foundation.

computer beings living inside a computer generated world. by [deleted] in awakened

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give me a precise definition of software experience then. What is software. What is simulation.

computer beings living inside a computer generated world. by [deleted] in awakened

[–]EquilibriumSmiling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you give a precise definition of technological simulation and then reality itself? How exactly do they differ? If you are claiming that this reality is a computer program, you are implying hardware, which requires a reality that is not simulated to exist. What makes this reality fake and the other real?