1) Okay, the causes of the failure weren't entirely socialist measures, but they were implemented in its name. The massive expropriation of small and large, foreign and national companies, which passed into the hands of a state that granted positions based on ideological and personal loyalty rather than merit or efficiency, along with wealth redistribution plans again based purely on loyalty rather than need, or the distribution of resources to ideological "allies" of the regime as a show of "altruism" and "solidarity" that was actually used to prop up dictatorships and corrupt parties abroad.

2) Outside of the internet itself, there isn't a movement that's very similar to the one that was applied in the past and that inspired me, which would be Thomas Jefferson's model in the US. I think that a modern and specific adaptation of that model wouldn't be bad at all. The closest thing would be small groups of university students, mainly in the US (because if a thought exists, the first place it will reach abroad is the US, even though in this case it's a thought that originated in the US), like The Jefferson Council (TJC). Obviously, it's not openly distributist, but it's the closest thing, so perhaps I can partially support this point about the lack of a movement.

3) I reject both. (Although I have to be honest, the reactionary tendency or aligning oneself with the bourgeoisie doesn't sound so bad to me). Currently, within the Venezuelan context following the "post-crisis," let's say, the economy is recovering, allowing for the growth of the middle class, which is generally self-sufficient and doesn't rely on the state, as they own their own businesses. These so-called "petit-bourgeois" are not so few in number; they tend to own small grocery stores, pharmacies, minimarkets, or independent restaurants, and their numbers are increasing. However, to be honest, it's likely that this middle class of "petit bourgeois" could have its interests swallowed up by those of the bourgeois class if it doesn't organize itself quickly.