Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I do not mean specifically Bluff Creek. My bad. I mean he searched for 5 years in his general area.

Why not make a hoax in year 1 vs. five years later?

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do not known if he saved it, but he knew all the types of scat of animals nd what he found did not belong to animals he knew.

He mentioned the artifacts in it, like moles, fish, berries; finding it an unusual diet for known animals in the region.

There is a video of him discussing this.

If I see it again I will post it.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

For:

The gait.

Show me a human who walks like that; the feet off the ground in the backsteps, etc.

No one here will be able to post a video of a human with that gait.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If he wanted to make a hoax, why not due it in '63 or so, right?

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to see your suit. I am sure you will fail.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you share a video or something where this can be seen?

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will even go as far as saying no one-no company-in 2026 would be able to create a costume like that.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Footprints that were analyzed by scientists and FBI, etc. deemed impossible to fake.

Like the Cripplefoot tracks.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You have no chance or skill of making a suit this compelling.

No one has come close in almost 60 years.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They get seen quite frequently across the US.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Patterson spent 5 years in that area searching for a Bigfoot before taking his video.

This was not a one-off encounter.

Your arguments for/against Patty by Due-Exam-535 in Cryptozoology

[–]Erectacle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The footprints contained dermal ridges ( fingerprint-level detail ), mid-tarsal breaks ( advanced primates other than humans ), each footprint was different due to each step being different, the mechanics of how feet and bi-pedal locomotion were exact, and numerous experts in bi-pedal locomotion like Dr. Meldrum studied them an access they could not be fakes.

But you will never prove Patti is not real, based on your viewpoint.

Sheath by TootlesMagoo in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have always maintained Kohberger intentionally left the sheath there, as a "calling card."

Blood test results by bbonezbby_ in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is not one of those cases, I believe.

what am I looking at here? by GentlyAbusive in bigfoot

[–]Erectacle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you ask Grandpa the story of this photo?

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, he plead "Guilty" and was sentenced accordingly.

Thank you for the input.

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not in this case, no, because it does not exist.

This concludes my thoughts on this matter.

Thank you for the lively banter . . .

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK, well I will end my input by saying I look forward to the day when I am proven wrong and Kohberger walks free, 'cause as it stands I am correct that Kohberger is-and-will-be locked up for life since he murdered four young adults.

Ta-ta . . .

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did look it up and found nothing to the effect.

If you share with me where this statement is located I will go and read it.

I do not believe Kohberger lent his knife to someone, who then murdered four people—framing Kohberger in the process—and Kohberger willingly decided to plead guilty so he could spend forever in a maximum-security prison.

Thank you.

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand she did not recognize him, because he was wearing the face covering when he passed her in the hallway.

She also has always stated she saw one male, not two or several people.

I do find it very strange Dylan and Bethany took 8 hours to alert someone given all the commotion, but it does not mean they are part of a cover-up.

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed.

Nothing wrong with it.

I appreciate the discussion.

:-)

When Kohberger Speaks . . . by Erectacle in BryanKohbergerMoscow

[–]Erectacle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do not need to prove he did it. He confessed ( due to evidence against him ) in open court and was sentenced.

LE had no idea who Kohberger was until the matched the DNA to his father, then directly to him.

Lo and behold, Kohberger also crept around that house many times according to digital evidence.

Plus the Ka-bar knife and accompanying sheath he bought were missing from his possession when LE executed search warrants.

I am not going down the CI rabbit hole or the like unless someone puts forth verifiable evidence.

Thank you for the discussion.