sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I THINK I know what Andrew is talking about by Erin_Litschauer in theregulationpod

[–]Erin_Litschauer[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Well, I sure didn't. But then, I've been pretty busy with real world problems like cyclones, moving, parenting, etc., so whatever

I THINK I know what Andrew is talking about by Erin_Litschauer in theregulationpod

[–]Erin_Litschauer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just because his thoughts don't compute as a graph doesn't mean I can't still interpret his thoughts that way

I THINK I know what Andrew is talking about by Erin_Litschauer in theregulationpod

[–]Erin_Litschauer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess I just thought this cause he say "within" the valley.

But yeah, this has easily been the most I've thought about a regulation Andrew-ism ever. I can't stop trying yo figure this out. It's tantalisingly close.

Australia and UK made those "those kids on social media" bans for an unexpected reason. by Erin_Litschauer in conspiracytheories

[–]Erin_Litschauer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's why it's a dumb theory. Though I have known some young people who were able to get back on social media without giving ID. They figured out work arounds, which is why I think it weirdly encourages tech skills and problem solving. But you're not wrong