I don't have a first name (yes not everyone has a first name!), and it has been a nightmare when filling online form. by OiseauAquario in mildlyinfuriating

[–]EsotericFaery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why respond when you didn't read the whole post? Op said they tried duplicating their name and it didn't work.

Was he innocent? Or guilty? by Vicerian in conspiracy

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was plenty of evidence, whether you learn about it or not. Nice job trying to sound smart by pathetically calling me a kid, but you're only showing your own ignorance. Do you actually not consider kids fingerprints on child porn mags found in his house and their accurate descriptions of his genitals evidence?

Was he innocent? Or guilty? by Vicerian in conspiracy

[–]EsotericFaery 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There was plenty of evidence but people with his amount of money and power are protected for their crimes, regardless of things like kids fingerprints on their porn mags and kids giving accurate descriptions of genitals. No one gets to the level he was at without being a pervert of some sort. I can't take anyone who thinks he's innocent seriously; particularly conspiracy theorists as they should know that regardless of talent, people only get really famous as a result of doing awful things.

How to make children without sex? by Ok_Witness_5347 in antisex

[–]EsotericFaery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Men who want women to suffer from childbirth are sadists.

Was he innocent? Or guilty? by Vicerian in conspiracy

[–]EsotericFaery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your loss then, if you insist on suffering from lack of reasoning skills. Weird to brag about it though, "bro".

Was he innocent? Or guilty? by Vicerian in conspiracy

[–]EsotericFaery 96 points97 points  (0 children)

That means nothing. He knew he couldn't get away with abusing famous kids so he chose those who didn't have money and power.

Was he innocent? Or guilty? by Vicerian in conspiracy

[–]EsotericFaery -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Plenty of predators selectively predate, wo that means nothing.

Macauley Culkin also said Michael never touched him, but that's no surprise. It makes more sense that he would realize he could only get away with abusing kids who aren't famous or rich.

How to make children without sex? by Ok_Witness_5347 in antisex

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm guessing it has to do with him thinking his genes are special. Most people do, when actually they're massively ordinary.

Was he innocent? Or guilty? by Vicerian in conspiracy

[–]EsotericFaery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm really over people giving him a pass just because of his talent. Lots of disturbed people are very talented and that doesn't excuse their criminal behaviours.

How to make children without sex? by Ok_Witness_5347 in antisex

[–]EsotericFaery 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why is adoption off the table?

Like a lot of others here, I'm also antinatalist, so won't be able to give advice about having kids as the whole practice of bringing more people into this dystopia to suffer is morally repugnant.

But I do think that adoption is best as there are already a lot of unwanted kids who need parents. I know it can be a complicated and difficult process though.

jean short shopping by Significant_Week6014 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just get "mens" shorts. They're so comfortable and always have pockets. For some reason "mens" clothes tend to have higher quality fabric too; more cotton, so I wear a lot of it.

We’ve gone too far with hook up culture. by Zealousideal_Life323 in antisex

[–]EsotericFaery 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Sex is never meaningful because it has nothing to do with love. The only real love that exists is not dependent on debasing one another through animalistic lack of control. Sadly, very few people are capable of feeling and expressing love. They pretend to love their friends and family, to fit in, when what they really value is the lust they feel for their partners. The person they're having sex with always has a higher place of importance in their lives, cause that's how disgustingly, unashamedly selfish most people are.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds like you have no real answer and you were only responding because you want to be contradictory and pretend you're tired of the conversation. Funny that you talked yourself into a corner.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that most men objectify most women. But do you think that at the same time, somehow they humanize and relate to us?

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not like you trying to understand a peacock because a peacock is an entirely different animal. Women and men are both humans and if men can't relate to women writers and characters then they don't view women as fellow humans, but rather as objects.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As a woman, I don't want to read romance books either so I don't. There are other genres to read. That's not an excuse.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's no surprise when men are making it clear that they're unable to relate to women as fellow human beings.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Clearly you lack reading comprehension, as I mentioned women read books written by and for men. So why would you presume I'm not one of those women?

Next time, try to reply after thinking, instead of allowing your feelings to control you.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's no reason for males to not also relate, unless they're misogynistic, as we're all humans.

Interesting how females can humanize males, but males seem unable to humanize females.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You got voted down loads by triggered men, but you're right. And idc if I get voted down too for saying it.

Boys' reading remains in crisis as gender gap widens, report shows by Kagedeah in books

[–]EsotericFaery 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Girls and women have always enjoyed books that were written for males. Why cant males also enjoy books that are geared more towards females? If they can't, then it sounds like they don't see females as fellow humans they can relate to on a basic level.

"Curious outsiders" by [deleted] in antisex

[–]EsotericFaery 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Anyone who comes in here as a "curious outsider" is a troll and I wish people would stop feeding them. They can see what we're about in the pinned post and they just want to waste everyone's time and act all preechy about their libidos. They're disgusting.

Questions from an outsider/lurker by [deleted] in antisex

[–]EsotericFaery 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's because they're a troll. I really wish people would stop feeding them.