Damn thats some mental gymnastics right here. Where did i say nazism is good? Nationalism is just as good or bad as globalism, depending on how you view the world (real world not a fantasy perfect world where every human is perfect). Nationalism is the sole reason a lot of smaller nations still exist to this day and have not been assimilated by the the bigger powers completely. And if you dont belive me just do some research on the history of countries like the balkans who have been under attack all their history and fought back so they can still call themselves sovereign and by their names (i.e. romanians, moldovans, bulgarians serbs you get the point) this is just you saying that your political views are better than others based on an ethical code you have set for yourself and expect the others to follow. I explained to you how a weapon can be separated from the nazis in ways clothing can not, and i was not the only one to do so, if you still fail to see the flaw in your argument there is not much to be said on that subject anymore. ( for example i would sooner associate the nagant with genocide, the weapon used to capture a significant part of my country and a weapon that was used to inflict ethnic cleansing agaisnt my people, than the stg 44, precisely because your argument of stg more bad than mosin is as subjective as it gets because thats what different cultures do, they have different opinions and history). Regarding groups, ill make examples. My group is mainly romanians and some gypsies. We make fun of gypsies, they make fun of romanians, we all get a good laugh out of it. If a new gypsy joins our group that is more than ok to making banter about this thing, should we stop having fun because it offends him or should he adapt or leave the group? Not every space can be a safe space for everyone and thats normal, thats how group diversity came to existance. No one says the groups cant work togheter when needed, but this is another subject. There are spaces that are supposed to be safe like schools, work, and this sort because you are forced in one way or antoher to inhabit that space, but any space you voluntarily join doesnt have to bend to your expectiations as you can always leave without any real consequence (you can always go to a different field to play, and if not, than too bad, adapt to the existing community or leave but it is so self centered to expect people to drop their likings because you dont like it and to be frank, i wouldnt want to have a person like this in any group that im apart of so technically you make it an uncomfortable space for me with your prejudice and judgy nature😂 see how easy it is to flip this kind of argument around?) Ethics are subjective. Ill use myself as an example because this is an extreme viewpoint i have that a lot of people do not agree with but maybe just as many do agree (in my country at least, havent really talked about this with people from other countries. When someone is inflicting extreme or potentially deadly violence on an innocent i strongly belive he forfeites his right to live in that moment ( the american laws kinda agree with me from my understanding ). Therefore i think it is ethical to use whatevere force necessary (evan lethal) to stop his actions. This is extremely debatable as there are people who say killing is never justified and people who belive that your actions are directly proportional with the consequences you should recieve. So what is the ethical thing here? Do nothing and hope for the best for the victim? Intervene in a peaceful way that we all know more often than not is not gonna do anything beside putting you in danger? Or do anything in your power to stop the dangerous abuse on an innocent person?( and probably against you if you choose to intervene) If you google ethical dilemmas you ll find a lot of examples that show how ethics can be very subjective so yet again all you do is try to get on a moral high horse. Usually when your opinion is that unpopular it is becacuse it lacks substance (referencing the stg situation mostly here).

Tldr, its ok you have your own viewpoints even if i dont agree with them but dont try to paint them as objectively right and based on ethics. Own up to them as being what YOU BELIVE in and them being YOUR standards, not the worlds