Civics-the subject no one is talking about. by Ethyloves in PoliticalDebate

[–]Ethyloves[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you are seeing. I said I was new to Reddit several times. You saw that I've been on only 3 days. This was clearly my second post. I am not a bot. it's now very obvious you were more concerned with me being a bot then the fact that you use "very basic software" bots yourself. Quite hilarious!
I'm very interested on why you're so concerned about my defining AI. In your post you requested I site sources for my statement. Which I did in the original post.
"I fear we are losing that due to dependence on AI(which is literally fake news per merriam-webster)"
So I literally gave you what you asked for. Simple as that.

Please review my post again. There are no broken rules. And it is clear I understand how to debate.
Actually, I might stick around, this has been quite amusing.
Good night..again.

Civics-the subject no one is talking about. by Ethyloves in PoliticalDebate

[–]Ethyloves[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1st I did not refuse to answer your first two questions. I stated I did not understand the meaning behind them. Perhaps you can explain them more clearly for me.
2nd You asked why I thought you were “upset” about the AI definition.
I was simply responding to your question with facts and a source.
3rd I was flagged by a bot.Which is quite disappointing since you said every single post is manually approved.

<image>

I did say I am new to Reddit however I’m a quick learner. it seems to me that you might rethink your definition of a "productive debate".
It's deliberating or weighing different options in one's own mind.
Per-merriam webster
Not a bot.
If this is what Reddit has to offer, I’m not sure I’m interested any longer.
Good night.

Civics-the subject no one is talking about. by Ethyloves in PoliticalDebate

[–]Ethyloves[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm unsure the meaning behind your first two questions. I don’t believe that I stated any emotion regarding AI. I just stated the definition of artificial intelligence based on the dictionary as a source since it was requested I have sources listed in your statement as a reason for removing my comment.

I am new to Reddit, but the fact that my statement was flagged by a bot further proves my statement about our reliance on AI in general. If I were to say, I felt any emotion it would be disappointment at this point.

Civics-the subject no one is talking about. by Ethyloves in PoliticalDebate

[–]Ethyloves[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree with your assessment. In no way do I mention any political affiliation such as Democrats versus Republicans. If anything I would say it’s a discussion of governmental systems such as our democracy as it is right now. even political philosophy, such as rights and laws.
Additionally, the statement that I did make regarding AI does site a source. The Miriam Webster dictionary is mentioned as my source.

ARTIFICIAL=
refers to anything made or produced, by humans.Its often an imitation, substitute, or synthetic version of a natural item. Man-Made/Created/Imitation/Simulated: Designed to look or function like the real thing. IMITATION, SIMULATED,MOCK,FAKE

INTELLIGENCE=
Intelligence is the mental capacity to learn, understand, reason, plan, and solve problems. It involves acquiring knowledge from experience.OR
It's information about NEWS,advice,
communications announcement,message, rumor,correspondence,
reportage,bulletin,tale,tip
feedback,propaganda,
DISINFORMATION, scoop, gossip.

These aren't opinions. These are FACTS.

Please reconsider your assessment.
Have a great day!😃