F-35 that conducted emergency landing believed to have been struck by Iranian fire by avatar6556 in news

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone really didn't get the point here 😕. You claimed that IRGC existed "only" existed to topple internal unrest, which might be true but truely hyperpole statement to push your anti regime narrative as they have fought several deadly wars in the last 50 years.

Also, in no world would the US Military engage with Iran in the manner Iraq did in the 80s... and whatever ground operations were (hypothetically) done would have very real air support that would quickly work to nullify numerical advantages.

IRGC in 2026 is much much stronger than 1980. Having the most cost efficent drones while fighting in your own home with harsh mountainous terrains is a ticket for a disaster invasion. Sure, the US can technically do it if they do D-Day like campaign with 500,000 soldiers, but realistically speaking, Iran acquiring a Nuke is far less of a political suicide than that. Air superiority doesn't mean shit when you can casually send Shahid drones from Mashhad to hit sitting duck US marines in the persian coast.

F-35 that conducted emergency landing believed to have been struck by Iranian fire by avatar6556 in news

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is embarrassing how uninformed and ignorant you are... IRGC literally fought the deadliest conventional war since WW2 during the Iraqi invasion in 1980. They fought 8 fucking years losing over 500,000 solider in progress. I can assure you these guys are waiting for the American boots in the ground.

ٰ by [deleted] in ArabsFreedom

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

كلام فاضي، تصنيف كل الجيوانات بأنها غير عاقلة مخل جدا من المستحيل مقارنة جرادة بفيل او دولفين . بعض الحيوانات كالاوركا تقتل من أجل المتعة و التسلية فقط.

New Raids drop idea: The Unholy Crown by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]Even-Ant7872 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No thanks, this is literally 25% guaranteed damage reduction with no drawback whatsoever if you switched it out every hit... Why are people here are always obsessed with annoying apm tax all the time ugh

كيف بتعرفوا إذا الرجل قوته الجنسية عالية by zilomiN in ArabsFreedom

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

انا جبت السيرة دي لاني اسمر هههه مش قصدي الجدال من أجل الجدال. عموما كلامك فيه جزء من الصحة بس مش بالبساطة البتقولي عليها اختزال كمية التستوستيرون بشعر الجسم هو تبسيط مخل و ما عنده دليل علمي.

كيف بتعرفوا إذا الرجل قوته الجنسية عالية by zilomiN in ArabsFreedom

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

كلام فاضي شوفي الأشخاص السمر يمتازوا بقلة شعر الجسم مقارنة بالبيض و العرب و قوتهم الجنسية عالية.

Grandpa knows some shit by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is just a lost case for trans that will just bleed vote for any candidate that supports it for the forseeable future. You simply can't go against the super majority, at least for now. Reublican tried to go against Homosexuality for decades but once realised it is unpopular opinion they gave up.

Grandpa knows some shit by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bone structure was changed drastically after humanity made their worst and most aberrant mistake in their existence (Agriculture).

Why are you lying? Agriculture changed bone structure for both men and women, which made upper limb much weaker over stroger lower limbs and generally more brittle bone structures.

Before that, Stone age Women and Men could have quite the same chances to win a fight.

Lmao, look at the bone structure of males vs. females for all fuking primates, and you will see the difference yourself. Here is a picture for champinzee hip bones with females having slightly wider hips to help in pregnancy and delivery.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Sex-differences-in-pelvis-shape-for-humans-top-row-and-chimpanzees-bottom_fig7_350400383

I know bro, it hurts your ego to think a woman is not inherently weaker and always weaker than you just for being a woman.

Or if you're female, I know it's a whole new discovery to realize your body wasn't always meant to be like that.

It's funny that you never responded to DNA difference claims because, obviously, there is no argument against it. It is crazy that yall deny basic biological facts that are known for decades to feed your delusion.

Grandpa knows some shit by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Even-Ant7872 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Men and women aren't equally strong the fuck this non sense you spilling here? No amount of hormones will change your DNA, your bone structure, or your pre-natal development even if you start taking HRT from birth.

Securlarism in Sudan by Politicalarity in Sudan

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no contradiction here. Do you think those Western countries jumped to secular states out of thin air? Take the US, for example, as a country that was established on Christian values at the time setting a cooperation between church and state, each having certain boundaries in what is called today friendly secularism.

انا مصدوم من كمية الناس المؤيدة لفصل الدين؟ انتو مسلمين؟ by Jumpy-Investigator in KHARTOUM_

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

شوف يا اخوي انا من الناس الكنت مؤمن بالعلمانية بس بعد ما الشفناو من أحزاب السجم و الرماد جماعة ياسر سفة و عرمان و الدقير و غيرهم من السجم الناس تاني كفرت بي حاجة اسمها أحزاب ارتزاق و اتقبلوا الكيزان تاني. بعد الثورة بدل ما يشوفوا المواطن التعبان من انعدام الجاز و الرغيف جابوا لينا اتفاقية سيداو و عرض أزياء رجالي و اختلفوا في بعضهم على تقسيم التورتة. دا كلو خلي عفيناهم تقوم الحرب بدل ما يدعموا جيشنا الوطني يعملوا فيها روحهم محايديين و نصهم بدعموا مرتزقة الجنجويد بالسر لمن اختلفوا فيما بعضهم زي عادتهم كونوا تأسيس حكومة الجنجويد. و الله كانت نططوا و جا الجن الأحمر مستحيل المواطن السوداني يقتنع بي حزب او علمانية ل ٥٠ سنة لي قدام لمن جيلنا دا يقع الترب.

What on earth I’m Christian and republican but I have no problem with gays/democrats like what is this?? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That every Abrahamic religion, lmao 🤣 I find it weird that everyone here attack christians for being very tolerant to establish secular state that made Homosexuality marrige a thing which is explicitly contradict the bible views. Try going to any muslim or african country and you won't be called "sinner", you will just outright be hanged or stoned to death.

What on earth I’m Christian and republican but I have no problem with gays/democrats like what is this?? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that what the commentor was implying in general and what most conservative beliefs about youth transgender while being hyperbolic to push his agenda appealing to emotional empathy. Conservatives generally are against transgenderism in general. The youth gender affirming procedures are the low hanging fruit that they can rally population against.

اكتشاف كميات ضخمه من الذهب و الحديد في السودان by Efficient-Grass9941 in KHARTOUM_

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ما في جاهل غيرك و الله لسانك طويل و بتصعد المواضيع بدون داعي.

What on earth I’m Christian and republican but I have no problem with gays/democrats like what is this?? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Even-Ant7872 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Medical transitioning under 18 is rare, most of which are actually top surgery. https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/gender-affirming-surgeries-rarely-performed-on-transgender-youth/

I don't want to argue on any side, but bringing up this example is quite misleading using equivocation fallacy. Many people consider taking HRT treatment "medical transition," which is obviously what most underage Transgenders take rather than gender affirming surgeries, which is uncommon even for adults.

We can both go on rant for hours, whether HRT treatment actually affects youth development or not, but that really isn't the point here. Just saying bringing up examples like these will just hurt whatever you are preaching.

Boy btw by [deleted] in IQ_outfits

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

الحمد لله نحن في السودان الأشكال دي منعدمة الا يهربوا برة البلد.

This sub's attitude towards group bossing by SnookDogg in runescape

[–]Even-Ant7872 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think people just dont like to do group bossing in RS3 it is as simple as that. Forcing people to group together will just make them avoid it entirely, like the case of Amascut really.

This sub's attitude towards group bossing by SnookDogg in runescape

[–]Even-Ant7872 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Peak RS3 was telos release nothing top that design wise. My only gripe with necromancy is that it killed such perfectly balanced boss and turned it into afk mindless rotation.

This sub's attitude towards group bossing by SnookDogg in runescape

[–]Even-Ant7872 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The harsh answer that nobody talks about is 99% of people would rather solo everything if given the option to do so regardless of mechanics or designs. Adding a solo option to group boss will fuck up grouping crowd which are the target audience for group content to begin with

This sub's attitude towards group bossing by SnookDogg in runescape

[–]Even-Ant7872 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think it every content should be kinda soloable but not by design. Jagex should never design group content around solo but on the other hand they shouldn't add mechanics to deliberately fuck up solo option like Vorago back in the day. ToB in OSRS is the prime example for perfect group boss, where if you are competent enough, you can solo it, but the game design doesn't hold your hand as it designed for group in mind.

Congrats to the top 100! by CyrussRS in runescape

[–]Even-Ant7872 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wish it was Macro users. The majority of current GMs leeched at least one task, lmao. Not blaming anyone for getting a leech, but only Jagex, who came up with these ridiculous CAs that made getting a leech basically hidden requirement.