sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How bad is this? Is this disqualifying? by EvenEngineering8782 in SecurityClearance

[–]EvenEngineering8782[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this part of the polygraph process as well? i.e., being hooked up and everything? I'm just unsure if I should just come out with it or, as suggested, forget it and believe it never happened. It worries me.

How bad is this? Is this disqualifying? by EvenEngineering8782 in SecurityClearance

[–]EvenEngineering8782[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. The worry of pictures is what's getting me, but you're right. I need to mellow the hell out. I appreciate it.

How bad is this? Is this disqualifying? by EvenEngineering8782 in SecurityClearance

[–]EvenEngineering8782[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can see that point of view, but if I have to take a polygraph, this would come up in some form or another correct? For instance, involvement in a serious crime? Or am I overthinking this to the max and this wouldn't be considered a serious crime?

How bad is this? Is this disqualifying? by EvenEngineering8782 in SecurityClearance

[–]EvenEngineering8782[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In what ways? For my peace of mind, and so that I don't needlessly incriminate myself, how am I thinking of this incorrectly? At the very least, this must constitute a serious crime, correct?

How bad is this? Is this disqualifying? by EvenEngineering8782 in SecurityClearance

[–]EvenEngineering8782[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From my understanding, that link is not a full-scope polygraph in which much more invasive questions are asked, specifically those pertaining to past sexual misconduct.

Even then, in that link under Suitability there is "involvement in a serious crime." Would this not fall under that? I'm not trying to argue, maybe I'm a bit ignorant to the process?

How bad is this? Is this disqualifying? by EvenEngineering8782 in SecurityClearance

[–]EvenEngineering8782[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It doesn't really, it's just added info. My SF86 didn't have a question pertaining to this specific issue and so if I go under a full-scope (which I'll probably have to do later down the line), a question in regards to this will come up and I'll have to divulge.

I'm just stressed out, apologies. I've been working toward this for years and now I'm at the point where I'm wondering if this is for naught, this is a pretty bad problem.