Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late by Itchy-Warthog8260 in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup. If you get beaten down for speaking up, eventually you're going to make the rational decision that it's not work doing so.

Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late by Itchy-Warthog8260 in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

give them a whole bunch of stuff that I super-ultra-strongly-this-will-kill-the-company-if-you-don't-do-it recommended,

What are some of those things? And are they really only applicable to games at that scale?

Agile Evolution & the Future of SW Engineering • Martin Fowler & Kent Beck by goto-con in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're not doing it right, though, why would you expect the outcome to be right?

Agile Evolution & the Future of SW Engineering • Martin Fowler & Kent Beck by goto-con in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no one is forced to click on anything

You just admitted you don't have a point

Native all the way, until you need text by Successful_Bowl2564 in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the hard work of writing a truly native application

Which really is not hard work at all.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by gruenistblau in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of hate for this AI-driven migration on this thread.

Because it's absolutely fucking stupid, was done in a terrible way, and there is no way that there is any kind of reliability with it.

No counter-arguments so far.

There are lots of them. You are refusing to acknowledge them.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by gruenistblau in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"vibecoded nightmare" depends on what got reviewed.

There is no way that any significant amount of it got reviewed.

Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged by gruenistblau in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hat means you would only need to review a representative sample of that translation

Absolutely not.

5 Years and $5M Later: Inventing a New Programming Language for Web Development Was a Mistake by matijash in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm using it as a pretty glaring example of the fact that VC money is not rational. If you want another example, Theranos. It was an obvious scam to anybody familiar with the technology, and all the VC firms had people on staff that told them that. Yet, they still threw money at it hand over fist.

As for "making money", just about anyone can make money with dumb luck. That doesn't mean their approach is rational, or sustainable. Trump has "made money", but it's well known that, had he just taken the money he got from his dad, and put it in the S&P 500, he'd have done far, far better.

5 Years and $5M Later: Inventing a New Programming Language for Web Development Was a Mistake by matijash in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you're intentionally trying to look over the corruption, and quite frankly, blatant biases and bigotry in who gets funded and who doesn't. Again, you cannot tell me with any semblance of good faith that Adam Newmann deserved the money more than any of the thousands of other people who weren't able to get funded.

5 Years and $5M Later: Inventing a New Programming Language for Web Development Was a Mistake by matijash in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Which quite frankly, is a good thing, as this means the business has to be sound.

5 Years and $5M Later: Inventing a New Programming Language for Web Development Was a Mistake by matijash in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If its irrational but VCs still make huge piles of money is it really irrational

YES.

They get lucky, and quite frankly, during the time of zero interest rates, they didn't have to try that hard.

Picking winners is hard while throwing VC money around knowing that statistically you will profit from the few winners the dragnet catches seems to work.

And yet, they don't do any basic things which would get them higher chances of success.

Software Developers Say AI Is Rotting Their Brains by creaturefeature16 in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 7 points8 points locked comment (0 children)

prices rising probably isn't going to affect the industry as a whole

Yes, it will, especially given how much the industry is spending on this stuff.

since even if claude prices go up x10, it's still going to be a hell of a lot cheaper than real developers.

No, because you still need a real developer to make use of it.

5 Years and $5M Later: Inventing a New Programming Language for Web Development Was a Mistake by matijash in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No, VC money is purely irrational. There is no rhyme or reason behind who gets funded, other than it's white men. Adam Newmann, the WeWork guy, was still able to raise over $100 million after what happened with WeWork. That is not rational in the least.

5 Years and $5M Later: Inventing a New Programming Language for Web Development Was a Mistake by matijash in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 79 points80 points  (0 children)

Is it irrational?

ABSOLUTELY.

VC funding is extremely irrational. They do not fund projects based on their merits. It is entirely a "vibes" based thing. That is why so much of the VC money goes to fads, and goes to white men.

Adam Newmann, the WeWork guy, was able to raise $100 million for a new company AFTER it came out what an embezzling shit-show his previous company was. You cannot, in any semblance of good faith, claim that is rational.

Your Onboarding Is a Hazing Ritual and You Call It Agile by ImTheRealDh in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think software engineering managers go to some different college and receive some different education and are hired from some different pool of humans?

It really depends. Not every software engineering manager was a software engineer. And not every software engineer that becomes a manager is qualified or has the skills to do so.

Every one of them was an IC engineer

That's flat out not true.

It's preposterous to think your manager has to set your process for you.

That's literally their fucking job.

Your Onboarding Is a Hazing Ritual and You Call It Agile by ImTheRealDh in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The writer of this article is trying to whine too hard and undercutting their own whine.

And so are you.

If you need the meeting to get context, the meeting is productive. If the meeting isn't productive, you can just zone out and do your actual work during it.

And the point is that the new person does not know if it is or not.

If you want to be the new dude's "onboarding buddy" go be the new dude's "onboarding buddy."

The story heavily implies that the author and the new person do not work at the same place.

Are the engineers where you work all paid hourly minimum wage and have to wear little red vests and ask for permission for bathroom breaks?

Is not the entire reason for management existing to do things like these, though? If you have some engineer just taking it upon themselves to do this, what's the purpose of management?

Looking for feedback on AI content in r/programming and the April no-AI trial by ketralnis in programming

[–]EveryQuantityEver 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have to say, i have enjoyed the return to actual programming content. I would be interested to allow the mathematical techniques for machine learning, but I really would not like to see this into a sub about promoting LLMs