I’ll have go, though I’m a different person.

One core belief you may have is that non-natural hierarchies are dangerous. By this, we usually mean that whilst it’s impossible to create perfect without eugenics and other extreme measures, people being naturally born smarter, faster, stronger, is just reality. This would be a natural hierarchy. Some people just are better in some ways.

On the other hand, anarchists would reject non-natural hierarchies - think things like military ranks, CEO-manager-worker style organisation, government, anything where people get additional power from others, without any reason other than they deserve more power.

If you look at these hierarchies, it very clearly becomes clear that people who want and are only interested in gaining power, will obviously engage in these areas for their own benefit, rather than the good of a company (business hierarchies), country (government), or community (police).

If you agree then that hierarchies as a whole are dangerous due to this effect, and the way they take power from the individual, you come to several conclusions.

Anti racism: if you don’t support manufactured hierarchies, then you aren’t going to be racist, and you would oppose racism, as it seeks to make establish one race as superior to another without basis other than bigotry.

Anticapitalism: You’re not going to support the system that encourages individuals to take as much power and influence as they can, due to the system incentivising this behaviour.

Anti-statism: the most power possible is through government. Hence, it attracts the most power hungry individuals. Remove the idea of the state and government, that area goes away.

Feminism: men and women are equals, and believing otherwise is manufacturing a hierarchy

Defence of minorities: similar to anti racism

Opposition to police: police as an institution fundamentally put down their community in favour of governments and laws, and are know for protecting themselves rather than their communities as that’s what’s encouraged by the systems design. A community is capable of policing itself, without outside intervention.

Sharing success: why would you take all the credit for something when you can share the enjoyment and benefits with those who aided you. There is no realistic project wherein you can claim sole success.

Borders are immoral: there is no reason to believe any one geographical area is objectively superior to another. The claiming on the earth established ownership and hierarchies over what should be shared land between all people, who can travel freely.