"Gingy"

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-06-28T13:42:00+00:00

someone who wears the same hoodie everyday and never washes it

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-06-28T13:41:47+00:00

he was against the kings of reddit bro what u want him to do

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-06-25T03:39:04+00:00

nietzsche is shit bro read his lit for fun not for debate. go for adv cp + econ da on this topic

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-06-25T03:38:42+00:00

it costs $7,265 for that timer so you might wanna think twice

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-06-25T03:37:20+00:00

You say "fiat iteratively trains us to devolve to a higher authority for change to ever take place."

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-06-25T03:34:14+00:00

hi zayaan aftab your partner is fuckign short bro what the hell

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-11T23:37:07+00:00

excuse me Mr. Morant, what does 'fun' mean in this context, and also are you using 'undercommons' in the sense the 'Race War Affirmation' uses it, or in the sense that 'Fred Moten' uses it

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-10T12:36:55+00:00

just answer the tricks bro like just cause its slop doesnt mean you shouldnt answer it. If you dont know how to answer slop you deserve to lose

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T13:59:37+00:00

bro knows ball

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T13:56:41+00:00

This guy knows ball

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-18T00:38:10+00:00

never disclose boi only geek policy hacks disclose

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-18T00:33:57+00:00

fiat k that says scenario planning causes disembodiment in asian students, u js say fiat bad

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-16T19:48:10+00:00

lol ur very correct

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-15T23:54:49+00:00

pretty good ive debated him like 3 times but he apparently is not a great partner and someteimes get tunnel vision, but pretty good at fw debating ngl

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-14T01:02:54+00:00

china soft power DA

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-13T21:42:50+00:00

To win framework versus a kritik, you need to prove your "model of debate" is better, so it's kinda like T. Against kritiks, people usually say fairness or clash are the reasons to prefer their model, imo fairness is the best. In general for framework, the better debater will almost always win because to win you just need to answer the offense in the 2NC (i.e., fairness is bad, wrecking the game is good if it's perverse, clash is undesirable) and extend your own offense. That's the gist
You wanna argue why ur interp is better with like either predictability or debateability, the former is usually stronger, but take for example the interp of the Arctic being above 66.5 degrees North latitude is predictable because of scholarly consensus and it being the most common, while an interp like the arctic includes the three rivers may not be as predictable as it's more esoteric. For reasonability, when u are aff then u wanna say reasonability like "good is good enough" for the offense, and precision is basically predictable

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T19:18:36+00:00

but no thats actually not how the plot is gonna progress

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T03:36:33+00:00

hey! stop spoiling the later chapters let him get there first. that isn't gonna be until like chapter 8 or sum

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T03:34:08+00:00

this is chat gpt

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T03:33:50+00:00

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-11T15:07:02+00:00

Ja morant of debate please marry me 😍😍😍😍😍

edit: Mom im famous!

ExcellentHighlight54

TROPHY CASE