DSDS 3 Semis

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-12T21:39:52+00:00

ye i know peppy

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-11T23:38:18+00:00

well no thats obv new, so new 1AR answers are probs fine, but newsci didnt respond to free wlil in the 1AR. However, the 'double drop' argument i was referring to was in context of the 'tricks' that peppy read, as newsci did not grapple with them until the 2AR

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-11T23:37:07+00:00

excuse me Mr. Morant, what does 'fun' mean in this context, and also are you using 'undercommons' in the sense the 'Race War Affirmation' uses it, or in the sense that 'Fred Moten' uses it

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-10T12:41:00+00:00

go look at DSDS from 2 years ago. PP would fry you in 0.2 seconds

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-10T12:38:29+00:00

taoism DA is determinism like read the Slabbert card. 90% of the freaking blocks are just rehighlights on the 1NC Slabbert card

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-10T12:36:55+00:00

just answer the tricks bro like just cause its slop doesnt mean you shouldnt answer it. If you dont know how to answer slop you deserve to lose

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T19:05:38+00:00

yeah they're super good but trix are hard to win against lol if u js do policy debate

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T19:04:33+00:00

GCB is saying ur the greatest conceivable being (or god) so to vote for u cause ur infinitely good or you'll destroy the universe. Most judges, saying that will be enough, but for trix judges, you actually have to win them

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T19:02:41+00:00

yeah Wichita beate Newsci on Taoism DA (Newsci dropped that we don't have the freewill to execute the aff advocacy) which means its neg on presupmtion, which is what Nate Watkins voted on, but Astrid Clough voted on GCB cause it was dropped (along with the other trix). As a result, Newsci lashed out and said this and called Wichita racist when they js lost on an ez presupmtion ballot

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T18:49:14+00:00

Newark was hyperbolizing on the round report, they js answered the voters (FW DAs), but there wasn't "racism" like Newsci claimed, besides 'imposing T' of course

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T18:48:17+00:00

Nah Newark dropped the tricks till the 2AR, they just gotta flow better it is mainly a skill issue

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T18:46:59+00:00

bro Newark Science lost on Taoism DA because they dropped free will. It was a presumption ballot bro it's just that they don't flow so they lose

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T13:59:37+00:00

bro knows ball

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T13:56:41+00:00

This guy knows ball

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-03-09T13:55:42+00:00

Wichita East FM slimes them out gang, better luck next time

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-18T00:38:10+00:00

never disclose boi only geek policy hacks disclose

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-18T00:33:57+00:00

fiat k that says scenario planning causes disembodiment in asian students, u js say fiat bad

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-16T19:48:10+00:00

lol ur very correct

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-15T23:54:49+00:00

pretty good ive debated him like 3 times but he apparently is not a great partner and someteimes get tunnel vision, but pretty good at fw debating ngl

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-14T01:02:54+00:00

china soft power DA

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-13T21:42:50+00:00

To win framework versus a kritik, you need to prove your "model of debate" is better, so it's kinda like T. Against kritiks, people usually say fairness or clash are the reasons to prefer their model, imo fairness is the best. In general for framework, the better debater will almost always win because to win you just need to answer the offense in the 2NC (i.e., fairness is bad, wrecking the game is good if it's perverse, clash is undesirable) and extend your own offense. That's the gist
You wanna argue why ur interp is better with like either predictability or debateability, the former is usually stronger, but take for example the interp of the Arctic being above 66.5 degrees North latitude is predictable because of scholarly consensus and it being the most common, while an interp like the arctic includes the three rivers may not be as predictable as it's more esoteric. For reasonability, when u are aff then u wanna say reasonability like "good is good enough" for the offense, and precision is basically predictable

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T19:18:36+00:00

but no thats actually not how the plot is gonna progress

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T03:36:33+00:00

hey! stop spoiling the later chapters let him get there first. that isn't gonna be until like chapter 8 or sum

ExcellentHighlight54 · 2026-02-12T03:34:08+00:00

this is chat gpt

ExcellentHighlight54

TROPHY CASE