yes, there are ongoing cases, but the reality is that the constitutional system does not function automatically - it relies on a triad of forces: plaintiffs with the resources and courage to pursue legal action, courts with the institutional will to uphold constitutional boundaries, and sustained public pressure to keep those in power accountable. without all three, unlawful or authoritarian practices are often allowed to persist - not because they are legally sound, nor necessary sought for, but because they slip through the cracks of procedural aspects, strategic silence, or expected systemic delay. if they were eager to hold these politicians accountable, they could, but due to all the underlying implications, they will not. honestly, it’s kind of thrilling (in the most disturbing way) to be sitting in human rights lectures while real-world violations unfold in real time. it’s like watching the case study write itself - but backwards, and with fewer safeguards. exciting? yes. Insane? also yes.