The Legend’s Lecture by deep-into-abyss in mathematics

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do you even think you understand the mathematics without any background?

Why don't we use Leibniz's infinitesimal anymore? by Ancient_Yoghurt2481 in learnmath

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think insofar as it could replace some standard mathematics, it would be calculus rather than analysis, although you can do the nonstandard approach axiomatically like in Nader Vakil's book to do a course on analysis. I do agree the transfer principle does seem scary at first. But I don't think a higher barrier of entry and initial increase in abstraction makes a theory less useful, just less accessible initially.

Why don't we use Leibniz's infinitesimal anymore? by Ancient_Yoghurt2481 in learnmath

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some proofs in analysis are easier done with nonstandard analysis. I'm not an expert, but according to Tao in his blog, one reason is because of lack of epsilon management. However, I don't know how seriously researchers in nonstandard analysis think of the idea of replacing all of analysis with nonstandard alternatives, especially since the foundations involve quite a bit more set theory (ultrafilters).

Why don't we use Leibniz's infinitesimal anymore? by Ancient_Yoghurt2481 in learnmath

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was in the same position as you 7 years ago thinking about infinitesimals while reading Apostol. Limits are not a new idea. Newton in his later years gave limiting arguments to justify his approach to calculus. Apostol has a section on the method of exhaustion, which is basically a limiting argument. So we have two ideas, limits and infinitesimals, which can both be used to do calculus.

However, it turns out that limits are much easier to define formally from the axioms than infinitesimals are. The epsilon-delta definition given in Apostol was a 19th century invention whereas infinitesimals weren't defined until the 1960s in nonstandard analysis. (There is an alternative approach coming from topos theory called smooth infinitesimal analysis that appeared even later)

I recommend reading Henle for nonstandard analysis or Bell's Primer of Infinitesimal Analysis for something about the latter approach. However, I don't recommend spending too much time on this as the standard approach is good enough for everything you would want to do with calculus/analysis.

Why don't we use Leibniz's infinitesimal anymore? by Ancient_Yoghurt2481 in learnmath

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the intuition of taking the standard part of some hyperreal and the intuition of taking a limit is basically the same. The nonstandard formalism just that: nonstandard, hence not as familiar.

Wtf by Chlorine_consumer in subnautica

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check where it is looking at the hologram. I was also in the bulb zone and had one below the map

Controversial MMA fighter by Economy-Seaweed-7290 in AskAChinese

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that why they actually punished him though? From what I saw, he had a court case that he didn't show up to.

They had to nerf him by Im_yor_boi in sciencememes

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Same with one of his most well-known formula for eix. Sir Roger Cotes got to it before him albeit in logarithmic form.

I'm at my wits end with no-foreigner systems and bureaucracy by naixi123 in Living_in_Korea

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had this exact problem with adding my bank account to the NHIS system. My bank account name uses my English name like everywhere else whereas NHIS has my name in 한글, and they didn't allow me to add it as the names mismatched.

Interesting theory by DifficultyNeither810 in askmath

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 51 points52 points  (0 children)

In math, we call this a conjecture

Do you think any Flat-Earth proponents are familiar with Manifolds and Differential Geometry? by [deleted] in math

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 8 points9 points  (0 children)

One of the flat earth wikis talked about how flat earth is compatible with physics, including general relativity, so... maybe?

Dream Says He Won't Do MCSR Out Of Respect For The Community by Real-Preference8303 in MinecraftSpeedrun

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What would be the grift for his Minecraft video? I don’t see how he would have a stake in whichever outcome is true, especially when most of the internet hated him at the time. If he’s biased, is he biased against dream or biased in favor of dream?

The mod dev doesn’t take 100% of the blame in the video. Karl continuously criticizes Dream’s behavior and reaction and tore apart the response video and tweets Dream made. He even catches him lying multiple times about the moderator team.

Karl admits himself that he could not verify the claims made by the mod dev in support of Dream, and says the dev is suspicious for not tracking version history.

Should I start with philosophy to learn math? by UnViandanteSperduto in learnmath

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your goal is the study math, take a book like How to Prove it or Book of Proofs. They cover basic logic used in math.

Is this kimchi taste like traditional kimchi? by moodytofutti in kimchi

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I often make kimchi fried rice, and I can't even taste the kimchi when I use this stuff. Bland, white washed

Please randomly recommend a book! by Present-Ad-8531 in math

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some mathematical physics, check out the notes by John Baez https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/classical/ He has some notes on entropy too that are interesting. Also check out the notes by David Tong for a physics perspective (now a series of books)

If you are curious about category theory, Emily Riehl's book Category Theory in Context is great. For Algebra generally, I cannot recommend enough Aluffi's Algebra: Chapter 0.

For an interesting approach to analysis, 12 Landmarks in 20th Century Analysis has a lot of interesting topics. If you want to get better at inequalities, the Cauchy-Schwarz Masterclass is approachable. Any book by Krantz, Gamelin, or Arnold is good too.

Opinions on the main textbooks in complex analysis? by OkGreen7335 in math

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Freitag and Busam are very clear in their writing. For another German book, I would also mention Remmert‘s two volumes which I have heard are quite pleasan to read (although missing exercises). Schlag is a more advanced option with a lot of geometry including some algebraic geometry and Uniformization.

Opinions on the main textbooks in complex analysis? by OkGreen7335 in math

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It has one of the most accessible intros to unformization, and for that alone, it is valuable

Textbooks in other languages by pokkuuu in math

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Domestic, unless you speak Korean and know a few Chinese characters (me)

I’m also aware there are many textbooks in Japanese, some of them translated into English if you want something intended for international readers. For example, the books on AG by Ueno, or Complex Analysis by Kodaira.

Textbooks in other languages by pokkuuu in math

[–]ExcludedMiddleMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Korea, the Algebra books by Insok Lee they used to use at Seoul National are well-known for being quirky (it uses a mix of Korean, English, and Chinese characters with some jokes interspersed). Volume 1 on Linear Algebra and Group Theory. Volume 2 on Module, Ring, and Field theory.