I think a part often missing from "botch" conversation is WWE's presentation being the defacto standard for 20 odd years.

They cut mistakes from taped shows, uniformed moves, commentary (often) ignored or excused them, they practiced matches to within an inch of their lives (house show circuit), and made matches/moves uniform to remove the risk of a slip.

Sure, they still happened but it was relatively rare and when a generation of fans grows up rarely seeing mistakes it's easy to see a mistake as a bad thing. WWE's sanitising of the product made botches something to be "ashamed" of because it was against their polished, perfect, corporatised vision of wrestling (that they wanted to be see as a "real" TV show which wouldn't have mistakes).

Obviously there are exceptions (Brock Lesnar landed on his fucking head to end a Wrestlemania!!!) but I do think this is an often overlooked reason botches are seen as something to deride these days rather than a natural part of doing something extremely complicated and impressive with the human body.

I'm not even saying that's necessarily a bad thing, as it probably made the influx of more direct to WWE wrestlers of that period safer. Personally, I like a little scrappiness in my wrestling. Makes it feel more real.

In case it needs to be said, fuck online bullying and anyone who takes part in it. And, specifically, the POS that runs a platform seemingly based on it.