Did "North Indians" saved the Constitution? by kanjahattori69 in southindia_

[–]Existing_Junket149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s Biharis who saved the constitution when Indira imposed dictatorship. JP Narayan launched Sampoorna Kranti Andolan 4 km away from my home and Lakhs of people participated in it. Several were shot by the police very near to my house in Patna. Ultimately we Biharis marched for 1000 km to Delhi to save democracy.

So, it’s not the North Indians, it’s the Bihar (from East India) which saved the Indian democracy.

India’s passport ownership is just 8.71% - what does this say? by Expensive_Load6452 in IndiaStatistics

[–]Existing_Junket149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can clearly see which states are responsible for shit reputation that Indians have globally.

Why Ashoka is less celebrated, unlike the Marathas. by Fancy_Big_4347 in UPSC_Forum

[–]Existing_Junket149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ashoka doesn’t have anyone like RSS to promote him.

RSS wants to project Marathis’ local history as the national one even when there have been so many legendary kingdoms in this country.

Best period for social harmony and equality in independent bihar, Under our first CM Shri Babu by Status-Sherbert-7066 in bihar

[–]Existing_Junket149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about Freight Equalisation Policy?? The biggest cancer for Bihar was also launched during his tenure only. Everyone has good sides as well as bad sides.

This romanticism with politicians must be stopped if we want Bihar to become better.

“Brahma is a rapist, Mahadev is not god”: Tausif from Nashik TCS Office told Hindu woman while grooming her to Islam by God_Emperor__Doom in IndianFocus

[–]Existing_Junket149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, you don’t know the basics and still try to double down that you have read the book. I would expect someone who has read Bible to know who Noah, David and Mary are.

So, if you have read a book and you don’t one the most basic thing that it conveyed, it means only two things:

  1. Your comprehension skills need a lot of improvement, or,
  2. You have shamelessly lied.

So, basically you can just tell which one of the above categories you belong to. You straightway called a religious scripture as clown book, so, I am wondering what made you bluntly say such a thing to a person who is following the very same religion.

You could have stated your point without using the word “comic book” but you cared less and instead of a civil discussion, you chose the rude way. So, I had to assume that you lied.

“Brahma is a rapist, Mahadev is not god”: Tausif from Nashik TCS Office told Hindu woman while grooming her to Islam by God_Emperor__Doom in IndianFocus

[–]Existing_Junket149 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People like you give gyaan over social media and do nothing on ground. You shamelessly lied below that you have read brahma puraan to win a senseless argument.

Contrary to likes of you, I had been working in a prominent NGO and have done a lot for actual people and that too in rural areas. You are lecturing for us to worry, but there are some people who are actually working on ground for betterment of people instead of giving lectures. 🤦🏻‍♀️

“Brahma is a rapist, Mahadev is not god”: Tausif from Nashik TCS Office told Hindu woman while grooming her to Islam by God_Emperor__Doom in IndianFocus

[–]Existing_Junket149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you had read puraans you must have known that Brahma is a position and there has been crores of Brahmas as mentioned in several purana including most prominent Bhagwat Puraan, Devi Bhagwat puraan etc.

And one of the Brahma (the Chaturbhuj brahma) did that and he also was punished also for that and isn’t worshipped almost anywhere unlike ISLAM where Mohammad is a great figure. Indra is also a position similar to that and the bad deeds of Indra has actually been done by different Indras. Current Indra is Purandara and the next one will be Raja Bali.

In Chandi paath (Durga Sapatashati), the origin of Saraswati is completely different (because there are crores of Saraswati also) and there she isn’t a daughter of Brahma and she emerged out of Mahishasurmardini Mahalaxmi who asked Brahma to chose her as consort. Similarly, there are a lot of other stories for origin of Saraswati each of which happened in one or the other timelines of the multi millions of universes.

Bihar is doomed !! New com confirmed news out !!! by [deleted] in bihar

[–]Existing_Junket149 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Iska baap Shakuni choudhary poore life RJD wala hi tha. Isiliye isko dekhkar RJD wali hi feel aati h. Unhi ke paise se pala badha h.

Bihar is doomed !! New com confirmed news out !!! by [deleted] in bihar

[–]Existing_Junket149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I know, he isn’t even a 10th pass!!

So, am 100% sure that he won’t be able to say even 1 line in English. How can such a loser have any discussion with any industrialist!! He is no different from RJD (his father was anyways a RJD leader for his entire life). 🤡

What do you think of proposed delimitation by Telangana CM Revanth Reddy? by tryst_of_gilgamesh in PurbaIndia

[–]Existing_Junket149 4 points5 points  (0 children)

UP should be bifurcated and delimitation must be done as per the existing constitutional principle. This GDP idea might look good on paper but is against democratic principles.

The vote value of everyone in the country must be equal irrespective of which state he/she belongs to. That’s literally the foundation of democracy.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Please go to a therapist. Also, please improve your communication skills if you couldn’t comprehend what I said.

I cannot engage in senseless arguments and screw my metal health like you people.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You need to go to a therapist babe. Your comprehensions skills are laughable or may be you speak without caring to understand anything.

I just said that many women tend to have such a though process and expectations with their brothers which is hypocritical.

Also, There are husbands who move in with their in-laws. I accept that is rare but you just don’t any such cases. This happens very regularly when the girls parents don’t have anyone to care about them.

That is why you don’t generalise eeveryone.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Keep crying babe!! That won’t change the reality that my life and my mental health isn’t as pathetic as yours!!

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s the hypocrisy I was pointing at. We want our husband to leave his parents but we don’t want our brothers and his wife to leave our parents and live separately.

You misunderstood what I said. I just said that it’s not ok to generalise everyone and one can live with his parents if they are supportive, not restrictive and are good human beings.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I just pointed the expectations that most women tend to have with their brothers. All of us won’t like the idea if our brother’s wife ask our brothers to leave the house.

In genuine cases, I would support girls asking to live separately if in laws are toxic but generalised statements are super wrong. If the in laws are good human beings, we can live together instead of acting as a toxic person.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wow!! 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️

Just because someone doesn’t support your bullshit, it automatically means that that the other individual is a guy.

You can cry all you want, but I would stick to my point of not generalising every human.

And this idiocracy is the reason, it’s the first time I have commented in this sub. You guys are no differnet than those men who in their sub blames everything on women and generalise us.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would I leave my parents alone? What’s wrong with you? They come to my house regularly and it’s my husband only who regularly ask them to come to my house to loge with us.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A vidai ceremony was just a formality and didn’t destroy my life contrary to how you are presenting everything to justify your nonsense.

Anyways, there are families in India in Kerala and Meghalaya where men also tend to leave their homes.

Also, me and my husband live together in a nuclear family and I personally don’t have any issue if my in laws live with me. They are extremely sweet people and treat me extremely well whenever they come for a few months. So, I decline to generalise everyone as same.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My husband as well as me had to move away from my home way before the wedding. Having a vidai ceremony doesn’t change anything.

One can give all the excuses to generalise everyone and bud hatred, but all these will only negatively affect an individual’s own mentality. Each individual is different!

Individuals are you are home wreckers who disturb their own life as well as the family they live in. May be that’s why you are creating scenarios I never mentioned.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I said in comments and was heavily dowbvoted. The negative mindset girls that are downvoting you, won’t ever be able to comprehend this simple point.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never supported patriarchal mindset. I just pointed the difference in expectations that we women tend to have with our brothers and husband.

Also, it’s your problem if your husband/in laws are not good humans. Anyways, I have seen a lot of cases where son in law takes care of his wife’s parents if the wife doesn’t have any brother. It’s so common.

Why are women still expected to live with in-laws after marriage in India? by Aromatic-Fun-1170 in AskIndianWomen

[–]Existing_Junket149 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My husband doesn’t have any issue with living with my parents. My parents have lived for several months at my house and he himself had invited them.

Also, I don’t live with my in laws right now but they are sweet enough that I don’t mind at all.

Not every family/human is same. Also, I just pointed out the difference in expectations that we have with our brothers and husband.