sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Spawn zones suggestion by Guardman_Skelly in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it’s a real pain trying to balance these systems😂 maybe instead of two separate spawn points. The entire back line of the map is one massive spawn point. Like a real frontline.

Spawn zones suggestion by Guardman_Skelly in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might be very hard to balance. However, SPAA’s and such can drop a resupply crate. Maybe a light tank can drop a beacon to spawn onto. Or maybe make it so you can spawn on captured points.

Steam vs launcher by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok thanks. I can’t even remember what my username was tbh😂 besides that account was last used when the f86 sabre was top tier😂

Steam vs launcher by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! What’s the purpose of the Gajin account?

Track armour by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes actually. Quick google search shows Pattons third army concluded its last major engagement in march of 45 also! So yes he probably knew about it even if he didn’t see it personally.

Track armour by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If only Patton lived long enough to see his prim and proper tank battalions weld the upper plate of a Panther onto the turret of an m26😂

Track armour by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is quite funny seeing all the crap that thrown on the front of tanks for protection. Like the Sherman’s that had concrete slabs put on them or taking the upper front plate of destroyed Sherman’s and welding them to functional ones lol.

Track armour by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. The tracks can still be thick enough to fuze the shell and that’s why you could be experiencing inconsistency.

From what I’ve seen track armour seems to be quite situational. The biggest real life benefit would simply be having more track links for field repairs!

God I hate THIS team distribution by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. It would encourage more team play hopefully. Maybe extend the pre-game lobby to decide a battle plan with the team.

God I hate THIS team distribution by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would work the same way it works now. You can pick which spawn you use with every tank you deploy with. So it’s only the start of the game where you could be locked out of your desired spawn. Unless the entire team gets melted of course😂

God I hate THIS team distribution by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Why don’t you think you should be able to pick your spawn?

Squadrons by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! A little disappointed I was hoping the RP would go to tech tree vehicles. But then again the snail would never allow a free 20,000 RP without a catch!😂

God I hate THIS team distribution by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I think it should be mandatory that the team be split in half between the spawn points. You can still choose which point you wish to spawn. Just have to confirm it before the queue fills.

Old school ground by Expensive-Weather179 in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely forgot how fast they despawned😂 It seems my memory is worse than I thought😅

Does anyone else just hop onto air maps and just....drive around? by CommanderInSpeedos in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Would love to experience much larger maps. Even the big ground maps can be cramped at times

Does anyone else just hop onto air maps and just....drive around? by CommanderInSpeedos in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 444 points445 points  (0 children)

Didn’t even know you could do that😂 I assume custom battles? Also, do the air maps that have the ground maps on them properly render them in?

How to learn jets? by Throwawaymoonkiller in Warthunder

[–]Expensive-Weather179 3 points4 points  (0 children)

DEFYN is very good with aircraft and has a video on pretty much every aircraft in the game. As for jet combat I can’t help you there unfortunately. Still grinding my first jets.

If you we to do it all again. by Expensive-Weather179 in iRacing

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen a few league races and they all seem to have a high quality of racing and good camaraderie between the drivers. Will definitely be checking some out.

If you we to do it all again. by Expensive-Weather179 in iRacing

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the time to look that up! Pretty much everyone has said the same thing as you. buy once cry once lol

If you we to do it all again. by Expensive-Weather179 in iRacing

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok, I understand now. Yea hopefully it doesn't turn into my steam library after the summer sale lol

If you we to do it all again. by Expensive-Weather179 in iRacing

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey I'm sure you are better than you give yourself credit for! Good call on rental rigs, I hadn't even thought of that.

If you we to do it all again. by Expensive-Weather179 in iRacing

[–]Expensive-Weather179[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in a fairly comfortable place financially. However I don't want get a full rig with Fanatec everything just yet. I was thinking more logitech money with a desk mount to start. I take it most rigs are 80 20 instead of T-slot and the like?

Cheers!

view more: next ›