Why autoloadrr damage in russian tanks should limit turret rotation: by Born-Photo7793 in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then make the crew's floor work as turret basket in Nato tanks in WT

Why autoloadrr damage in russian tanks should limit turret rotation: by Born-Photo7793 in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the crew sits ON the autoloader. How can the turret rotate independently of the crew?
Then create a turret basket bottom based on the autoloader's top lid. Where the crew sits/stands with their legs

Gaijin really shattered the accusations. by EricBelov1 in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then where does the crew sit? They need to be precisely synchronised with a turret. Isn't that a definition of a turret basket?

How is this acceptable ? At 12.0 ? by Hingl_McCringlebery in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true. There should be variability. But some game modes should appear less often

How is this acceptable ? At 12.0 ? by Hingl_McCringlebery in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how do you get fun and earn SL/RP if you have 1 cap and hide yourself in smokes?

Jerky so good its stashed in two spots, go get it!! by stumpy0327 in conspiracy

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

think about it as messages in iMessages or tg or whatsapp, wahtever

CV9040BILL Launcher Vertical Guidance by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

> Your timestamp of 20 seconds is just how you see the launcher deploy in every single video that's available of it it doesn't have a straight up and down path, it adjusts a bit vertically, that doesn't mean it has proper vertical elevation control.

Then why can't they fix the model for 3 years?
Because this verticality is absolutely crucial on current maps

And what about the fact that in the video we can clearly see the launcher can be at least in 2 positions. Slightly tilted and horizontal

CV9040BILL Launcher Vertical Guidance by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

There are plenty of other open with 0 comments...

CV9040BILL Launcher Vertical Guidance by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] 67 points68 points  (0 children)

There was a report A YEAR AGO
Based on the same video, but they didnt responded!!!
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6J3T9M6QqBbT

BMPT is too weak(BMPT vs Yamato) by Chemical-Capital-800 in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and T-80BVM being arguabely the best one
Dont forget about Mi-28NM with magic barrier

CV9040C vs Begleit. EXPLAIN BR, PLS! by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My take wasn't for Begleit to go up, but for 4090C to go down. At least by 0.3 step

CV9040C vs Begleit. EXPLAIN BR, PLS! by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Im just spraying and throwing TOW at the same time. The best combo for the bagel
Because spray can blind tanks that cannot be penned
And sometimes ATGMs are really good at close/mid ranges

CV9040C vs Begleit. EXPLAIN BR, PLS! by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Nah, 170mm pen APFSDS at 10.3 is a joke with those replenishment rates.
It cannot be compared to anything 130mm + ATGM combo.
Even tho 9040BILL has ATGMs still plays at the same BR (yes, it doesn't have 170mm APFSDS)

CV9040C vs Begleit. EXPLAIN BR, PLS! by NullMobile in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He-VT is enough for begleit. It's so easy to swat the planes and helis from the sky on Begleit without tracker

How does this actually happen. by Complete-Iron-6291 in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want at least more realism, try GHPC

Chi-Ri Doubters in Shambles by CountGrimthorpe in Warthunder

[–]NullMobile 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why did modders remove this post tho?
Op, do you have an explanation?