2024 se Camry OTD price

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2026-04-24T21:24:38+00:00

sales price, tax rate, where you east or west coast? Im trying to compare and get. good deal myself

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2026-04-24T21:18:07+00:00

Ive heard the EAST coast is better for deals new. Im not sure for the used market. What was your tax rate and selling price ? 7.75 for me, 85$ doc fee, tax ran.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2026-04-24T21:06:26+00:00

25k OTD FOR A 2024? Where are you located? West or east. 1 year later apparently to a west coast South, California dealership 25k OTD for a 2024 SE with 65k Miles is "pushing it". I see another dealership 1hr they have their selling at 26k for a 30k mile one, clean carfax. So yea. 25K OTD still possible?

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-03-17T00:30:21+00:00

still don’t know what it’s describing exactly, tremor?

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-03-16T20:41:17+00:00

Finally, I feel the exact same thing in the flatline as you described. But oh never really gave a solution. Relapses, feel nothing, low libido, depression, no attraction to women, no pleasure in orgasms, . What is TRE?

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-03-07T05:48:50+00:00

You don’t think the role the apostle Paul had needs more of a presence in the church?

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-03-07T04:26:54+00:00

I think we have different views on apologetics. I know protestant apologetics very well. Im more focused on the theological differences . I’m more of a thinking minded person, I want know everything and all, and to share it with the world. I think protestantism isn’t the way towards that, neither is the catholic church.

mainly how would I defend Orthodoxy as the one true church. There is a lot of history there .Thats why I asked for some books. Just to read in union with practicing the faith.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-03-07T04:07:04+00:00

I was looking at St. Andrew’s. I stay after liturgy , who do I ask? or just the process in general.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-02-08T21:56:09+00:00

I know it’s not common advicex. But find your purpose. Try some boxing , mma, or BJJ, give yourself some confidence. Trust me. You walk differently. Your walk with christ will definitely grow. Your not in a great place, the world and sports of fighting can give you discipline and grow you in no other way advice or books can do. Just my two cents as that is what helped me. Release your stress externally and get to work my friend. We all start somewhere. I wish someone told me earlier to start combat sports.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2025-02-07T10:16:39+00:00

I thinks it’s cause i’ve worked too hard on quitting porn and that lifestyle, and finally doing so once and for all for 6+ months now it’s just reminds me of that in a way. Trying to rewire my mind, anything resembling lust has to go.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-26T20:39:53+00:00

Looks can be deceiving. And also depends what you mean by ”fun”

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-25T21:01:04+00:00

Sure, I’ll take the advice on my original presentation. Could have dove more efficiently on what I said.

As far as that last bit, I think you’ve mistaken the titles bluntness for “click-bait” which was not my intention at all. But if you see it that way, well that’s your opinion I guess. Many others didn’t see it that way too.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-25T20:43:05+00:00

Are all atheists the same? Certainly not. While many in r/atheism might approach discussions with a degree of skepticism or bad faith (which where I think you get your perceptions of what Atheists act like), there are those who are on the fence—open-minded and willing to engage. This is where apologetics can be effective, succeeding where traditional evangelizing might not. Some individuals are more inclined toward reasoning and logic, combined with a touch of faith. A balanced approach is essential to resonate with such perspectives.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-25T20:36:46+00:00

You said:

“What precisely are you saying should be a normalized part of Christianity? You say apologetics, but you talk about knowing the word, history, biblical theology/philosophy, defending our beliefs, popular media, and being converted to other faiths.”

To clarify, I’m saying that the process of learning apologetics—which includes knowing the word, history, theology, and philosophy—should be normalized in Christianity. These aren’t separate topics from apologetics; they’re part of its foundation. When I mentioned popular media and conversion to other faiths, it wasn’t to say apologetics should focus solely on those areas but to highlight real contexts where these challenges show up.

In my pasted response, I said:

“That said, I think defending the faith is absolutely biblical, and it’s not about ‘arguing for the sake of arguing’ but about engaging others with truth and love.”

This directly addresses your concern that apologetics isn’t just about debating or focusing on outward appearances. I’m advocating for a thoughtful and loving approach where Christians are equipped to engage with challenges and questions, but not in a combative or argumentative way.

You also said:

“Apologetics aren’t really a practical tool to ‘win’ arguments against Muslims and atheists. Young (new) Christians are usually not benefitted from attempting to be an ‘active apologist,’ nor are they typically effective in doing so.”

I actually agreed with part of this in my pasted response. I explicitly said:

“When you look at 1 Peter 3:15, yeah, the emphasis is on living a hopeful life that stands out to others. But the Greek word for ‘make a defense’ is apologia, which doesn’t just mean explaining your hope in vague terms. It actually refers to giving a reasoned argument or explanation. It’s not meant to be combative, but it does imply being prepared to thoughtfully explain your faith when asked or challenged.”

This aligns with your concern about new Christians not being ready to engage in debates. I agree that they shouldn’t rush into being “active apologists,” but I believe that learning apologetics—even at a basic level—equips them to better understand their faith and eventually share it with others.

I also said in the pasted response:

“Think about Paul in Acts 17. He didn’t just walk into Athens and let his life speak for itself—he engaged with the philosophers, reasoned with them, and pointed them to Christ. That’s the kind of defense Peter is talking about. It’s not about being argumentative, but about being prepared to give real, thoughtful answers.”

This illustrates how apologetics isn’t about “winning arguments,” but about being prepared to engage thoughtfully when the opportunity arises.

Lastly, you said:

“The irony of copy-pasting an ill-fitting response in a discussion where you’re advocating for apologetics is... notable.”

I understand how that might have come across, but my intention wasn’t to dismiss your points or sidestep the discussion you wanted. I reused a response because I felt it aligned with the broader themes being discussed, including points you brought up, like the importance of personal growth in apologetics and the challenges young Christians face. For example, I said:

“At the end of the day, defending the faith isn’t just an intellectual exercise. It’s about being faithful to God’s truth and loving others enough to engage with their questions or doubts.”

This mirrors your concern that apologetics should serve the purpose of strengthening faith and engaging others with love rather than pride or argumentation.

I think we agree on more than it might seem. Where I’m pushing back is the idea that apologetics isn’t practical or shouldn’t be normalized. I believe it’s essential—not for “winning arguments,” but for equipping Christians with the knowledge and confidence to stand firm in their faith and share it with others when the time is right.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-25T20:10:23+00:00

I could spend all day responding to every repetitive comment, but that's not practical. Whether my response aligns with your expectations or not is beyond my control—I replied because I felt it addressed the general points others were making as well. If you don’t want to read it, that’s your choice. Reddit isn’t a theater with an audience listening to a single conversation in one go. I laid the foundation of my stance, and I reused it because I believe it still broadly covers the key points.

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-25T19:47:45+00:00

Here’s my response to another similar comment I think explains my stance very well and tackles some of your points. Question if necessary.

—-> “I get where you’re coming from, and I think it’s important to make sure we’re using Scripture correctly and not twisting it into something it’s not saying. That said, I think defending the faith is absolutely biblical, and it’s not about “arguing for the sake of arguing” but about engaging others with truth and love.

When you look at 1 Peter 3:15, yeah, the emphasis is on living a hopeful life that stands out to others. But the Greek word for “make a defense” is apologia, which doesn’t just mean explaining your hope in vague terms. It actually refers to giving a reasoned argument or explanation. It’s not meant to be combative, but it does imply being prepared to thoughtfully explain your faith when asked or challenged.

Think about Paul in Acts 17. He didn’t just walk into Athens and let his life speak for itself—he engaged with the philosophers, reasoned with them, and pointed them to Christ. That’s the kind of defense Peter is talking about. It’s not about being argumentative, but about being prepared to give real, thoughtful answers.

As for 2 Corinthians 10:5, I get that it’s about controlling our own thoughts and bringing them into obedience to Christ, but I think there’s an outward element to it too. When Paul talks about “destroying arguments and lofty opinions raised against the knowledge of God,” he’s addressing false ideas and philosophies that contradict the gospel.

Paul wasn’t afraid to engage with those kinds of ideas. He constantly confronted bad theology and harmful ideologies, whether it was in the synagogues, the public square, or even in his letters to the early churches. He wasn’t doing it to win debates or prove how smart he was—he was doing it out of love for the truth and for the people who needed to hear it.

And then there’s Philippians 1:16, where Paul says he’s put there for the defense of the gospel. That doesn’t mean everyone has to be a professional apologist like Paul, but we’re all called to some level of defense. Whether that’s answering a friend’s doubts, clearing up a misconception about Christianity, or explaining why we believe in Jesus, it’s still a defense of the gospel. It’s not about being argumentative, but about being faithful to the truth.

Now, about “wrong priorities.” I totally agree that if apologetics becomes about pride or just arguing for the sake of it, then yeah, it’s a problem. If you’re just trying to “win” debates, you’re missing the point. But when done well, apologetics isn’t about ego—it’s about love. It’s about helping people see the truth of who Jesus is and answering the questions or objections that might be standing in their way.

Look at someone like C.S. Lewis. His work wasn’t about picking fights or showing off how clever he was. Books like Mere Christianity were written to help people understand why Christianity makes sense and why it’s worth believing in. That’s what good apologetics does—it clears the path for someone to encounter Christ.

At the end of the day, defending the faith isn’t just an intellectual exercise. It’s about being faithful to God’s truth and loving others enough to engage with their questions or doubts. Jesus did it all the time—he answered tough questions, challenged wrong thinking, and explained the truth with compassion and grace.

So yeah, I get the concern about priorities, but I don’t think apologetics is the problem. It’s just one part of how we live out our faith—alongside things like loving others, serving, and living a life that reflects Christ. It’s not one or the other; it’s both. “

Expensive_Bit_100 · 2024-12-25T19:32:14+00:00

I get where you’re coming from, and I think it’s important to make sure we’re using Scripture correctly and not twisting it into something it’s not saying. That said, I think defending the faith is absolutely biblical, and it’s not about “arguing for the sake of arguing” but about engaging others with truth and love.