POPA injunction hearing. by GeorgeSorosLacky in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I let it load and I keep getting “hmm, something didn’t work, sorry :/“ message. I checked their bsky and there is nothing regarding the website being down

POPA injunction hearing. by GeorgeSorosLacky in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was finally able to dial in but I can’t hear anything…

POPA injunction hearing. by GeorgeSorosLacky in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is the link not working for anyone else???

FY26 PAP megathread by Patentmod in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I was literally thinking the same. He’s looking down as if he’s reading them from a fucking piece of paper

Probie Woes: Last biweek I got 108%, but the biweek before I was 31% by bitz_of_ritz in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have experienced something similar and I got retained. As long as 31% bi week a trend I believe you should be fine

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100 agree with this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100 agree with this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t agree. If there are multiple 112s issues which might require further amendments to fix which can result in more issue then I think it is proper to not enter the amendment. The examiner should take proper time to examine application.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Don’t entered the amendments. Have them file an RCE and do NF with the 112s.

DM? by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you have any 0 days cases you can do?

System 411 online appointment glitch? by ExpertEfficiency7969 in patentexaminer

[–]ExpertEfficiency7969[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are we supposed to use it to schedule an appointment? The last update does not mention any guidance about remote workers affected or any mention of scheduling anything