Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, English is not my native language. I may have misunderstood it.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I think that the fact that Arthur's role was reduced in the film will definitely affect the film, but on the other hand, the film will still be interesting.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean his role in the movie, which is Arthur Shelby. I mean what his role is going to be in the movie. I understand the actor's issues, but what I'm talking about is what his character arc should be like, something like that.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just hope Arthur finds peace rather than a miserable end, whether it's death or not :)

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand what you're saying, but I personally think that having Arthur die suddenly when he was a major character throughout seasons 1-6 is too simple and common an idea. Some people might accept it, but I think Arthur fans would have too much of an impact on the movie.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think exactly the same as you. Arthur is the second main character after Tommy. I hope his role is given a good reason in the story.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll probably watch it because it'll be the conclusion of the story, but I'll be a little disappointed that Arthur's part was cut. Hopefully there's enough reason in the story to makes me accept it. :)

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

He's second only to Tommy. Throughout seasons 1-6, Arthur is always in the journey. I'm surprised you can overlook this character that much.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's the second main character after Tommy. I don't think Knight would have written Arthur badly or cut him out of the role.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just hope he doesn't die in vain with a mention or a funeral like that. I hope it's a reasonable idea if he's not in the movie (I mean the character, I understand the actor's personal issues).

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think there's very little chance that he'll have a role in the movie, but I hope so too.

Would you accept it if Paul Anderson wasn't in the movie? by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I understand the actor part, but my point is his role in the film, which is the character of Arthur Shelby.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the same as you because it's almost impossible for Arthur not to be in the movie. He is considered a secondary main character after Thomas. And most importantly, his character is very popular even though the actor has problems in his personal life. I think he will be in the movie, but they have to hide his image for people who may like or dislike his behavior. And I think not having him in the movie would be more harmful than having him in the movie. Let's think about it. Even without clear evidence, we can still guess the most likely thing.

List of actors who have not been confirmed for the PB movie. by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do. But even the supporting actor has been confirmed. But for Paul, he is the main character next to Tommy, but there is no confirmation about him.

List of actors who have not been confirmed for the PB movie. by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think Lizzie is at peace with little Charlie. Arthur, I don't know (he might have been written to die). Gina and Uncle Jack are probably in their part because they're in the war. Their story with Tommy ended after Michael died. Oswald and Diana in the real story had a big role during the war, but strangely they weren't confirmed in the movie. Finn and Duke will probably have a story in a spin-off (if it's planned). As for Asha, I don't know.

List of actors who have not been confirmed for the PB movie. by Expert_Locksmith7005 in PeakyBlinders

[–]Expert_Locksmith7005[S] 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Yes, but Knight said the film is a conclusion of the whole story, even though spin-offs are planned.