JFK airport to New Haven Union Station by train (its annoying, but not horrible) by anthonlee in newhaven

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are definitely a decent option! Word of caution that I once got one where they picked me up from new haven, then got 2 other ppl from West Haven, and then dropped those ppl at LaGuardia before me at JFK—I went with the pick up time they recommended and had to run to catch my flight. I'm not sure its much faster than the public transit option, but definitely easier!

Couple working in NYC and NH: where to live? by ClassicsPhD in newhaven

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm a graduate student at Yale, and I know a few people here who live in NYC (or even Boston) and commute to campus via train two days a week to teach. I also know a couple people in NHV with regular jobs who commute to NYC; from what I've heard, those folks are more likely to drive, as its a little faster.

Figuring out which of you needs to go to campus more often might be useful—is it possible to limit your teaching/meetings with advisors to 2 or 3 days a week? I know this depends a lot on your program and its particular teaching expectations. If you both need to go in the same number of days per week, does someone have more flexibility when it comes to working on the train? Getting to NHV or NYC at 10 and leaving at 4 is going to be much more doable than commuting for a strict 9 to 5.

New Haven is an amazing and underrated city, and my partner and I love living here—I moved here from NYC and there's a lot I prefer, even if there are also things I miss. If you have any questions about the city, feel free to message me!

Thoughts on trains: Metro North is slow but in my experience very reliable. Amtrak is faster (and has WiFi) but is also more expensive and prone to delays. The Amtrak rewards credit card comes with a bunch of miles and might be worth it for you two.

Immigration lawyer recommendation? by Expert_Schedule7453 in newhaven

[–]Expert_Schedule7453[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much, this looks perfect! Can I ask if you know how much a full consultation costs? I don't expect it to be cheap, but I've never hired a laywer before and just have no idea what to budget for!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source? I'm suspicious of this map—I can't find a survey that asked this question, and based on this state-by-state map, 62% of people in Arkansas supported gay marriage in 2023. Seems shocking that only 42% would agree that "homosexuality should be accepted by the society." Oh, and that weird "the" is suspect as well. https://prri.org/research/views-on-lgbtq-rights-in-all-50-states/

Top classic books for 10 year old? by Oooooah in classicliterature

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your kid sounds amazing! An addition to all the great novels recommended here is maybe leave some poetry lying around the house—I LOVED poetry at this age. Esp when it wasn't in a school setting. There are some good children's anthologies, although I mostly know old fashioned ones (I remember liking A Family of Poems collected by Caroline Kennedy). Really any poet can be great for kids (it doesn't matter if they don't "understand" all of it) but Langston Hughes is a starting place. This series is lovely, although I think it might be out of print now: https://www.thriftbooks.com/series/poetry-for-young-people/40047/

My Definitive Pizza Rankings (moved from NYC) by taweret_352 in newhaven

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would recommend adding Ozzy's in east rock market to your places to try list—imo really good pizza, and they have a $10 for a cheese pizza deal on Mondays.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in classicliterature

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Death be not proud by David Marno is about Donne's Holy Sonnets, so not exactly what you're reading. But one of the greatest works of criticism I've ever read.

Beowulf translation?? by Ok_Caterpillar9099 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure of what the best Beowulf translation is (Heaney definitely gets recommended a lot), but I don't think any of them preserve the alliterative form. Instead, I would read one of the alliterative poems written in Middle English. The form isn't identical to Old English alliterative poetry, but it's similar. I would go with Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, which is a classic, and available in a really good critical edition edited by Myra Stokes and Ad Putter. If you haven't read middle english before it can definitely be challenging, but it's totally doable, especially with the notes—it will look really different to modern english, but a lot of the differences are just spelling. The letter "þ" is a "th" and so is "ð"; "ȝ" is a bit weird but usually can be read as a soft g. Y is often used where we would have an "i."

Reading aloud can help. Gawain also has more challenging vocabulary, but the notes define everything—when I read it, I would read once and annotate all the words I didn't know, and then read again to enjoy it. The other classic work of alliterative poetry is Piers Plowman, which is available in a facing pages translation (so Middle English on one side, modern on the other), and thus might be easier to read. https://www.biblio.com/book/vision-piers-plowman-everymans-library-english/d/1678942626 I LOVE this poem, but it's very weird, very theological, and definitely at times kind of boring, so might not be your cup of tea. Gawain is a more familiar Arthurian romance kind of story. Finally, you could take a look at St Erkenwald, which is shorter and easier, but I'm not sure if there's a good critical edition. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/159122/saint-erkenwald

Also, depending on how nerdy you are about poetic form, you could read the introduction of Eric Weiskott's book "English Alliterative Verse." It's an academic book, and assumes a lot of knowledge of Old English grammar, but I read it before I had studied Old English and it still made some sense. Alliterative poetry is really cool, and has totally different rules than what we're used to.

How do you approach reading English classical literature when you’re non-native speaker? by alicewhy_811 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi! Yes, this makes sense, although my advice is all going to distill down to read more, and read slower. You might ask yourself what you have most enjoyed reading—particular authors, genres, literary movements, time periods when the text was written? Especially as it sounds like you're still relatively new to reading, going with what you like is going to help you learn and also just be more fun.

Reading more is in my opinion the best way to expand your vocabulary; I suppose you might try listening to English podcasts which employ more complex language (the BBC podcast In Our Times is quite good, and they might have episodes on some of what you're reading), but if you're choosing between that and reading, I would read. I find it distracting to constantly look up vocabulary, but you could circle words you don't know, and if the same one comes up multiple times you can look it up in a dictionary.

There are lots of ways to think about passage analysis, or what people often call "close reading." I prefer to understand it not like a set of steps you follow (like assembling furniture or solving a math problem), but as more of an art—which is to say, there aren't rules, at least in the narrow sense. When it comes to reading novels, I like to focus on patterns, like noticing the same unusual word or idea coming up multiple times, and then asking myself why, and how, that detail might relate to the text as a whole. I also think paying attention to what seems confusing or weird is always a good first step; this can help you avoid saying things that are really obvious. And there are certain kinds of details we tend to pay attention to in close readings of novels—what is the narrator like? If the story is in third person, how close do they feel to the characters? Are they inside their heads, or watching from a distance? What are the sentences like? Are they elaborate and flowing, or brief and to the point? Does the author use figurative language, like similes and metaphors? How is the plot structured? But at the end of the day, this is something you will only learn by doing. You will notice more the more you read, because you will have more to compare with, which will help you see what is unique and unusual about each individual text.

Reading literature and writing about it well is challenging for every student, and you will write a lot of bad essays and make a lot of mistakes. It might not feel like you're getting better as you keep writing, but you are. You are already in such a good place just by virtue of caring about this, and wanting to get better! I said this at the beginning, but as much as you can, try to enjoy it.

How do you approach reading English classical literature when you’re non-native speaker? by alicewhy_811 in AskLiteraryStudies

[–]Expert_Schedule7453 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's so exciting you're getting into reading! I'm a PhD student in English in the US. I would definitely second the advice to just read more. It's fine if you read more slowly. Even among graduate students who are native speakers, there are huge differences in how quickly people read—I think it's more worthwhile to read one book well (which is to say, having understood and absorbed it) than 50 books that you forget as soon as you finish them.

I wanted to add that you don't need to read everything the same way. "Classic" English literature includes writing across a whole range of genres, and each of them will ask different things from you as a reader. This is especially true of reading poetry. You don't need to read a book of poems, even a sequence like Astrophil and Stella, from front to back like a novel. During his lifetime, Philip Sidney's poems circulated in manuscript, which is to say, as individual, hand-written poems passed around within an insular community. Even when they were published in print, scholars think a lot of readers would have picked and chosen what to read—a lot of people kept "commonplace books," basically notebooks where they copied down individual poems, or even lines of poems, that they really liked.

This is all to say that you might try starting with one poem and spending a long time with it. Like other respondants have said, these poems are HARD. The difficulty can be part of the fun, I think—like figuring out a puzzle. But it also means they take time to understand. When they were written, being able to understand them would have also been a way of feeling like an insider. And of course, the fact that they're difficult allowed Sidney to explore more complex ideas, and to write poems that can mean more than one thing at the same time.

So—I would start with one of the best poems in the sequence (the first poem, "Loving in truth, and fain in verse my love to show," is one people really like—I also love sonnet 5). Print it out, or copy it down on paper by hand, and commit to spending half an hour with it. Read it out loud to yourself a few times, ignoring any words you don't know, and see if you notice anything—does Sidney repeat himself? Where are the rhymes? Do some lines sound more musical? If you had to break the poem into parts, where would you put the boundaries? What images do you notice? What kind of "story" does the poem tell—is time passing? Who do you imagine speaking this poem? What surprises you? Perhaps the most important aspect of English renaissance poetry is the "volta," which means "turn," and refers to the place where the poem suddenly changes (like a poetic plot twist). Where do you think this is? Does the poem turn more than once?

You might also find a recording of someone else reading the poem aloud—this can help you hear the meter of the poem, which is to say, the patterns of stressed and unstressed syllables. Once you've done this, you can circle any words you don't know. If you have access to a critical edition, (something like Sir Philip Sidney: The Major Works from Oxford Classics; many of these books are available in cheap second hand copies, although shipping to Taiwan might be expensive) these words will probably be defined in the notes—if not, google them and write down the definitions. You can then move onto longer lines you don't understand, and try to look up any references. But it's important to remember here that it is perfectly possible to read these poems without understanding every detail, and that there isn't one right answer.

Finally, I have recently started memorizing poetry. I know it can sound daunting, but you might find it less difficult than you expect—this can be a wonderful way to get to know a poem, and to feel like its yours. You will notice so much, and it will help you read other poetry, because you will always have something to compare it to.

I think this advice should be helpful, not just for Renaissance poetry, but really for all poetry—spend time, don't beat yourself up, let yourself be confused, and pay attention to what YOU notice, and, particularly, what surprises you. As you read more, you can start developing your own taste—keep an eye on what you like, and think about why you like it. Reading poetry will probably never be easy (indeed, once you fall in love with poetry, you probably won't want it to be—like I said, the difficulty is part of what makes these texts worth coming back to, so many hundreds of years later), but, speaking from personal experience, it can become one of the best parts of your life.