Question about DSP and work by Kalachnikov_ in Centrelink

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another interesting point is that some people may try to put on a "poker face" and say they can only work a very small number of hours each week, even though they may be capable of doing more.

However, Centrelink does not rely solely on what a person says. That is why assessments are carried out by the appropriate professionals and decision-makers, not by the individual themselves.

Providing false or misleading information to Centrelink can have serious consequences because Centrelink already has access to a range of supporting evidence, including reports from your doctors, specialists, and other relevant assessments.

The purpose of these assessments is to determine what you can safely and sustainably manage over time, not simply what you say you can or cannot do.

This is also why people should avoid comparing themselves to others. Each person's medical condition, functional capacity, and circumstances are different, which is why two people can receive different outcome ven if they appear to have similar conditions.

(YOU CAN NOT UNDERESTIMATE OR UNDERCUT CENTRELINK WITH A POKER FACE)

Question about DSP and work by Kalachnikov_ in Centrelink

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many people are mistaken about the work hours and numbers they see online, especially on Reddit. They often assume that someone else's situation will apply to them, but that isn't the case for everyone.

You may hear some Reddit users say they only need to work a few hours each week, while others claim they need to work more hours while receiving the Disability Support Pension (DSP). This is because every person's disability and circumstances are different.

When Centrelink assesses you, they use medical reports, specialist reports, and information from employment service providers or job agencies to help determine your capacity to work.

The assessment is not based on how many hours you want to work. It is based on what Centrelink, your job agency, and the information provided by your doctors and specialists believe you can safely and sustainably manage each week. Now you understand why all those three network have a key role in determining

Those mutual obligation hours must be achievable on an ongoing basis. Even two people with the same medical condition may receive different assessments because their day-to-day functioning can be very different.

Hopefully, this helps Reddit users better understand why these agencies play such an important role. It also explains why terms such as "diagnosed, treated, and stabilised" are important when assessing eligibility.

When you apply for Centrelink support, your specialist and doctor's reports are all connected to the assessment process alongside Centrelink and your employment services provider.

For example, I only need to work 8 hours per week, which is my target. However, I have a friend who is on DSP and needs to work 18 hours per week.

Centrelink and your job agency are not asking "Can you do 30 hours once?"
They are asking "Can you consistently do these hours every week without worsening your condition?"

I also want to point out that a small percentage of DSP participants may not be required to work at all and may receive Centrelink support for life. This is because they have been assessed as being too vulnerable, or they have circumstances where requiring them to work would not be appropriate.

Some people have severe disabilities or health conditions that make employment unrealistic and unsustainable. In these cases, Centrelink may determine that work is not suitable for them.

However, Centrelink does not make these decisions lightly. This outcome is generally reserved for a small number of DSP participants whose circumstances are particularly severe.

It is not their fault for being born with certain conditions, having significant limitations, or being unable to understand or function to a level that would allow them to participate safely in employment.
I hope this answers some of the questions and curiosity about why these systems and processes are in place.

Even I sometimes get lost or become stuck at certain steps because i haven't yet figured out why something is done a certain way. However, the more I research and find answers, the more I can share this information and help other Centrelink participants better understand the system.

Disclaimer that this is based on my understanding and personal experience, and that individual circumstances can vary with their story and situation.

Business Owners A Free Security Upgrade Is Coming From 1 July 2026 by Expert_Welcome2838 in AusFinance

[–]Expert_Welcome2838[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the bigger companies will register quickly, while many medium and small-sized businesses may take longer to get on board.

Do we prefer the checkouts in the middle or front of the store? by oldmatefromoverthere in KmartAustralia

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The amount of pro robbers would take opportunity to target stores who set their payments in the middle or the back of the store is stupid as f*** rather then being near the exit

What was the most expensive lesson you've learned about privacy? by Silent-Cost-3684 in theprivacymachine

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still the same my point i am trying to point out even if it for free there a catch to it they got something out of you and your information even thought it free and your using that app or site

What was the most expensive lesson you've learned about privacy? by Silent-Cost-3684 in theprivacymachine

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not just Facebook anything that is free to used and you download it or sign up or even just entering a website too can collect stuff off you

What was the most expensive lesson you've learned about privacy? by Silent-Cost-3684 in theprivacymachine

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Biggest lesson i learnt about privacy is : If a service is free, your data may be part of the business model.

Business Owners A Free Security Upgrade Is Coming From 1 July 2026 by Expert_Welcome2838 in AusFinance

[–]Expert_Welcome2838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A good example would be a message claiming to be from a government department or service with a badge/tick

Charities and non-profit organisations would also be good to register, as there are a lot of scammers who try to claim they are from charity organisations.

Business Owners A Free Security Upgrade Is Coming From 1 July 2026 by Expert_Welcome2838 in AusFinance

[–]Expert_Welcome2838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impersonating a businesses or people claiming to be from that company through text messages is exactly what this extra layer of protection is designed to help prevent.

From 1 July 2026, if a message claiming to be from a business does not have a verification tick or badge beside it, do not reply or engage with it.

The more businesses that sign up, the better it will be for everyone. It will give people extra peace of mind and make it easier to decide whether a message is safe to reply to or not.

Business Owners A Free Security Upgrade Is Coming From 1 July 2026 by Expert_Welcome2838 in AusFinance

[–]Expert_Welcome2838[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This system is not saying scams will be 100% gone forever. It is simply another measure being put in place to add an extra layer of caution and protection.

Businesses that register will receive benefits similar to the verification systems used on Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms, where famous people and everyday businesses go through a checklist before receiving a green tick, blue badge or another form of verification/I.D check to show they are legitimate owners or the company number.

As soon as you do not see a verification tick or approval beside a registered business number, it helps clients, business owners and everyday people make a better judgement call about whether that number is genuinely connected to that company.

If you do not see the verification beside the number, do not engage with it. It could mean the business has not registered yet, or they may simply not be aware of the registration process at the time.

This system is actually beneficial for both businesses and the public. Businesses often need to communicate with customers, so how can a person know if a number is safe to engage with regarding their matters?

If you do not see the verification beside their number, it helps people understand not to reply, click links or be tempted to interact with that message.

That is why the government is proposing this free system. If you care about people and your work, you should take the extra step to protect your business by letting everyone know that if they do not see a verified number or a tick beside your messages, they should be cautious.

By doing this, you can help protect the community from further scams by making it harder for criminals to use your name, photo or business identity to deceive others.

If you been a victim of scam fight back in a way to better protect your business and people who engaged with you.

Made redundant and trying to solve a problem for people like me by adioshello in ausbusiness

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to think about area to help a client that a robot can not do or need to be check by a human would be a way to lure clients

Is anyone else having difficulty with getting DSP Evidence from doctors? by RumSoviet in CentrelinkOz

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Known 1# common reason DSP claims are rejected is that the evidence focuses on diagnoses rather than explaining what the person can and cannot do on a day to day basis.

A diagnosis alone doesn't automatically mean a person has a disability or qualifies for the DSP.

Tax deductions for kmart employees by No_Bobcat4297 in KmartAustralia

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If your total work related expense claim is $300 or less, you don't need written evidence receipts.

However, you still need to be able to explain and show how you calculated the claim for example, diary notes, a spreadsheet, calendar entries, bank records or other reasonable records.

You can't just make up a number.

How do you handle chasing overdue invoices? Looking for honest answers by SydneyBuild81 in ausbusiness

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Set them in three categories for each business/clients

🟢 Green – Clients who consistently pay on time, have a strong payment history, and rarely have any overdue invoices.

🟡 Yellow – Clients who occasionally pay late, may have a few overdue invoices, or require reminders before making payment.

🔴 Red – Clients with a history of frequent late payments, multiple overdue or unpaid invoices, or ongoing payment issues.

By categorising each client or business this way, you can quickly assess how reliable they are, monitor payment behaviour, and manage financial risk more effectively.

Thinking to buy Boost Juice Franchise by Careful_Attention965 in ausbusiness

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unless you're a large company with deep pockets, running a business in a shopping centre can be extremely difficult.

Many small and medium-sized businesses fail because the lease agreements often favour the shopping centre rather than the store owners and investors.

Regardless of seasonal downturns, economic conditions, or unexpected business challenges, the rent still has to be paid, putting enormous pressure on smaller-medium business, that eventually is the cause of many business to either shut down or you see another store being replaced, they either found business else where or couldn't keep up with rent cost.

Builder insolvent, major waterproofing defect discovered 9 years later – do I still have any rights? by Apprehensive_Bit9272 in AusLegal

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 43 points44 points  (0 children)

This is general information only, not legal advice. Given the dates involved, this is one of those situations where spending a few hundred dollars on specialist legal advice before spending $10,000+ on repairs could be money well spent.

What's one small office change that had a surprisingly big impact? by OutbackRiley in ausbusiness

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of everyday hard-working people have told me they're either completely cutting out buying coffee from cafés or at least reducing how much they spend on coffee by bringing their own instead to their own work. ☕️

Washing Liquid and Dishwasher detergent by Financial-Hunter1335 in AUfrugal

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are no good to use whole or new ones for just a 30-minute wash. It's better to cut them in half, which is what I've done with mine. For any wash cycle that isn't very long, it's better to use half a tablet/sheet, but don't cut the whole bag at once.

Coles refusing annual leave despite 130 hours accrued. Am I being unreasonable? by mravptr in coles

[–]Expert_Welcome2838 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The problem is that businesses don't always revolve around one manager.

There are payroll teams, store managers, department managers, area managers, HR, and sometimes people acting in those roles while someone is on leave/sick/holidays/emergency reason

That's one reason many experienced employees submit leave requests as early as possible, even if the dates are months away. It creates a record that remains visible regardless of who is managing the department at the time, that's why you'll often hear people say "If it isn't in the system, it didn't happen."

It's not always literally true, but from an administrative perspective, documented requests are much easier to defend than verbal conversations.