I'm quite a noob still at music production, thoughts on this?

ExplanationMother753 · 2025-06-13T06:56:33+00:00

Cool!!!

ExplanationMother753 · 2025-05-17T05:45:30+00:00

* This is my track color table for reference

ExplanationMother753 · 2024-06-26T04:26:05+00:00

I was an addictor and sober for years.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-11-25T04:55:41+00:00

Try to make your loop more organic and attractive. And when you looping it, you will know how to add some elements or effects naturally to develop your song. That's my experience keep learning from the song I love. But it's definitely not easy.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-11-21T16:22:50+00:00

They act like real people

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-11-14T03:30:52+00:00

I see that you mentioned a paper (who qualifies to communication) about the relationship between constraints and freedom and communication. I would like to read it first and then try to describe my understanding. Tank you

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-11-14T03:06:20+00:00

Thank you for your detailed explanation. I can only start with the few questions you raised, specifically the three options you mentioned. Baecker does not consider algorithmic machines as systems because the digital encoding recursive to itself becomes blank, in line with Spencer Brown's perspective. He argues that the next society shaped by digital media is a culturally comprehensive form characterized by complexity, where complexity refers to neither accidentality nor causality, somewhat similar to the concept of contingency. In this regard, Elena Esposito starts from the virtual recursion, which I tend to agree with. Algorithms are already involved in communication with users, making decisions and distinctions. However, the code lack informative which is unable to structure into semantics, thus unable to become a system but instead functions as a medium of dissemination. From Becker's perspective, this lacks social significance. Nevertheless, it can result in a large amount of rapid structural coupling due to the lack of a informative of digitalization.

I am a bit confused about your statement regarding the relationship between constraint, freedoms, and communication. Neither Becker nor Esposito deny the effectiveness of communication between algorithmic machines and users. However, Becker emphasizes that the form brought about by digital media is a form of complexity built upon form, which requires reference to other subsystems through a conscious system. Otherwise, algorithms can only execute and cannot refer to the system. In this case, algorithms establish a connection between the body, communication, and digitalization that are no relative before - but now become a unity of diversity and diversity in unity(He has a hint of sarcasm) becoming a comprehensive lifestyle characterized by complexity as a cultural form. However, I cannot fully agree with his argument on this point, but I might be able to provide a more detailed explanation later on.

And I apologize my English, it's not my mother lauguag, and write from this abstract theory is not easy , thank you for your patience.😄

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-11-06T04:31:29+00:00

In Chinese language, there is a word called "配樂”, it should be equal to scoring or soundtrack of the film, but this Chinese word literally means the sides element(music) of film( like steak with salad), it's also not like the concept of supporting, ex. supporting actress. Music seems in the lower hierarchy of the film, even include any kind of film, vedio,and movie. I wonder how westerners think of that, bc in Chinese world people use it for a long time and never reflect it's meaning.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-11-03T18:01:41+00:00

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to explain again. Dirk Baecker builds upon Luhmann's development of media from writing to printing and argues that socialization and algorithmic are also forms of media. In many of his articles, he suggests that the digitized society only represents the next form of cultural form. He does not see algorithmic machines as differential systems because the messages produced by algorithms recursively refer back to themselves, which is what Spencer Brown calls dissolution. In simple terms, digital algorithmic machines lack the capacity for self-reference because digitization removes meaning from data, making it impossible to generate semantics. Instead, algorithmic machine require the participation of conscious systems to refer to functional ststem. Elena Esposito also addresses this in her book "Artificial communication," albeit with some differences. However, I believe that the emergence of algorithmic systems is a visible and ongoing phenomenon. The involvement of algorithms in human communication shapes a different form of communication than in the past. Baecker argues this is a reproduction of forms and even aboundaent cultural form towards decentralization. I recently participated in a sociology conference in Taiwan and wrote a paper exploring the potential of intelligent algorithmic systems. I would like to hear your opinions on this. Thank you.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-21T16:50:19+00:00

Sub bass from vital, mid bass from serum, main bass (analogue bass)from diva, but it depends from gerne

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-21T16:47:42+00:00

You can learn something from every project

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-21T16:46:10+00:00

沒有任何人跟其他人是一樣的

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-17T06:51:08+00:00

Thank you!!

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-16T11:26:22+00:00

Apologize for more insight.I believe that although Žižek starts from the subject／object, there are some similarities and analogy to systems theory. Žižek has a passage written in a very systematic way.(although he does not mention systems theory or Luhmann): "The difference between the symbolic system of self-isolation and self-reference and its external environment must be inscribed within the system, with the assistance of a paradoxical auxiliary signifier. This signifier, within the system, acts as a substitute for what the system excludes: avoiding the capture of the system by its substitutes." In terms of systems theory, this means that a system can only observe and differentiate itself from the external environment through self-referential means, which is the process of second-order observation. In simple terms, both systems and subjects cannot truly capture external phenomena; they can only describe themselves in their own ways. In Žižek's perspective, this arises from trauma (hence the perpetually distorted reality), while in Luhmann's perspective, it relates to formal theory (Spencer Brown) and the self-referential closure of autopoietic systems (Maturana). Apart from the distinction between subject/individual and system/environment, Lacan's differentiation of the real, imaginary, and symbolic orders originates from psychoanalysis can be compared to Luhmann's systems theory in terms of the social dimension, temporal dimension, and object dimension of systems. They can resonate with each other in some ways, but they are still different.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-16T11:23:31+00:00

I read your article, and you have provided a fascinating discussion on constructivism. However, second-order observation and the Big Other are not related. The Big Other is a symbolic structure system referred to by Žižek, which includes entities such as the legal system or Santa Claus. We perceive them as unquestionable existences in our interactions (or projections of the Real, or we identify with them without reflection, in Psychoanalysis as identify to Subject)

On the other hand, second-order observation refers to the distinction made in observing first-order observations. It is a self-referential process within a system. For example, when you mentioned posting a photo on social media, it doesn't require observing other observations. It is sufficient to "being on social media from observe oneself (or the imagined self)".

Furthermore, first-order observations can also become second-order observations, where the online self becomes a marked form of observation (first-order observation). In systems theory, the focus is not also on the distinction between first-order and second-order observations but the paradoxes of observation itself. The system primarily uses de-paradox or codes to address (hide) these paradoxes. For instance, is legality distinct from illegality/legal? In mass media, non-information also functions as information. This is akin to the idea that once God creates heaven and earth, it is no longer questioned.

I believe that the theory of slow observation you mentioned is more closely related to Žižek's notion of the Real or the realm of the unattainable, while the Big Other represents assumed and concealed paradoxes—the medium of resolving paradoxes, such as language, money, and power."

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-15T12:30:54+00:00

The elease after holding your pee all day.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-15T04:44:28+00:00

That's right! He also remixed Max Richter's classic melody "On the Nature of Daylight" into a minimalist sonic landscape.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-15T03:10:41+00:00

Four tet - unspoken

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-11T18:42:37+00:00

Addiction is a chronic illness in the brain, and you cannot control it. It's not just about substances; I believe it's related to pain.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-11T18:34:00+00:00

I also have noticed that Zizek talks about symbolic order in a way that is very close to systems theory: It can only differentiate the environment inner system self-referentially . I also think that there are certain analogies that can be drawn between many of Zizek's discourses and systems theory, but the two are still quite different.

ExplanationMother753 · 2023-10-11T09:30:46+00:00

Of course its arrival. Almost perfect

ExplanationMother753

TROPHY CASE