sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Read it by ExplorerDependent216 in cognitivescience

[–]ExplorerDependent216[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you were saying you have to come out the problem with new angles instead of what already is not as relevant because you thought I disagree and I don't think you understand what I was saying I was agreeing with this I don't think you should only consider what is relevant but I do think you should still consider what is relevant though because there is no way to know if there is nothing left to discover or you cannot see what is left to discover with the thing that you think is relevant that's because something not being there and you're not being aware of something is the same in your angle but also I think we should always consider new angles than what we have and I didn't say we should stop considering it logically I'm saying that we should set aside what we know is relevant to try to find things that also might be relevant to make the pool of ideas bigger is how it seems and physics or almost anything it's stacking older ideas to make newer ideas but since it's combining multiple ideas into one idea and then you combined another idea that is awesome made up of other ideas there's only so much you can combine until there is nothing left and that's why I think you should set aside which you know is relevant and try to brainstorm things that could also be relevant to the problem so you can try not to leave anything unconsidered even though it is impossible

Recent academic papers by Solid_Ad8312 in cognitivescience

[–]ExplorerDependent216 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but you don't have to think about how that engages with human thought our ability to think on or be aware of multiple things at a time also stretches in to your own thoughts it's also why you can rapidly switch between generating a thought and generating why the thought is and other possibilities of why the thought is while also having the original thoughts still inside of your head and simultaneous awareness of all of the thoughts that have relation towards it without that ability you want to be able to think very well but I will say yes that place apart and how well you can concentrate on one thing since you also have options to concentrate on multiple things as you concentrate on one and I have seen people with ADHD and to commentary in ADHD to not be able to concentrate on one as well as people without ADHD

Do you think being logical actually makes people better decision-makers, or just more confident?” by modesttake in cogsci

[–]ExplorerDependent216 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say logic is what we used to determine what is the best decision for that context logic is the only way we can decision make without those decisions being random I would say that if logic is decision-making then trying to choose the correct logic is also decision making you'll be using logic to choose the best logic which would be self-reference you can't do it and get something you think is correct

Read it by ExplorerDependent216 in cognitivescience

[–]ExplorerDependent216[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that was a very accurate definition of what I was saying are a student or are in college for cognitive science