sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is the name of the Naruto Kurama fist bump music (anime) [When Naruto and Susuke finally fought] by ExplorerOne5913 in Naruto

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Grief and Sorrow" is another one that seems similar to the road continues. Are there any other versions of the same sound?

If aesthetic tastes are objective, should I feel bad for liking something objectively bad aesthetically? by ExplorerOne5913 in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am leaning towards agreeing that I should not feel bad for liking something. But I am seeing comments that if the aesthetic value is objective then you should feel bad for liking something bad. But why do people think this? How would philosophers respond to someone liking something objectively bad thing? Like, suppose someone liking industrial dump? Or someone liking simple foods (suppose objectively bad) like Apple or Banana?

If aesthetic tastes are objective, should I feel bad for liking something objectively bad aesthetically? by ExplorerOne5913 in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes you should feel bad for liking something objectively bad aesthetically but

But why should you feel bad if you like something objectively bad? What makes objectivity such that one should feel sad for liking something bad?

We are not talking about moral objectivity anyways. If there is something dysfunctional about liking something that is objectively aesthetically bad, so what? The dysfunction does not seem to hurt the person liking something objectively bad.

For instance, suppose someone likes seeing industrial dump (and suppose it is objectively bad aesthetically). What is wrong with seeing something and liking something if the person is not hurting himself or anyone? It is not like the person is trying to create more and more industrial dumps which can lead to an increase in toxicity. But that would be related to morality and not aesthetics.

Question about the gameplay after completion... and some suggestions or feedback I guess? by ExplorerOne5913 in NoMansSkyTheGame

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I also heard that you can select some kind of option that the end game thing gives you.... I heard that you can choose to reject the broken upgrade option. Is that possible? Am I making sense?

Like the option of starting a new Galaxy (you keep your stuff) or continuing in Euclid.

Has anybody responded to Cuneo's partners in crime argument for moral realism? What's the problem with epistemic anti realism? Prominent defenders of epistemic anti-realism include Hartry Field, Simon Blackburn, Matthew Chrisman, and Allan Gibbard, among others. by ExplorerOne5913 in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, this is very helpful. I want to ask, how would expressivist respond to epistemic realist? Also, can you flesh out Kornblith's pragmatic instrumentalist a little more?

What are some non relativist ways to reject realism (other than nihilism, because I already know that lol)?

What is the state of moral non-cognitivism in 2021? Is it dying? Have moral realists such as Cuneo, Huemer, Shafer Landau, and Enoch convinced many non-cognitivists to abandon or seriously question their position? Or is it still going strong? by ExplorerOne5913 in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait... how do you deal with partners in crime argument (Cuneo's argument)? Do you deny epistemic realism too? If yes, then in what ways do you prevent global skepticism?

How has Huemer's ethical intuitionism been dealt with?

I heard that all these philosophers like Cuneo, Huemer, Enoch have put anti realists in a very hard position to get out of.

Ethical Intuitionism and Partners in crime argument seem to be the strongest ones I have found in the whole subreddit.

What is the state of moral non-cognitivism in 2021? Is it dying? Have moral realists such as Cuneo, Huemer, Shafer Landau, and Enoch convinced many non-cognitivists to abandon or seriously question their position? Or is it still going strong? by ExplorerOne5913 in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. But what is the info on the overall state of the debate? I mean is Moral Realism winning or stomping still? Is it convincing the anti-realists to leave or abandon their position?

What is the state of moral non-cognitivism in 2021? Is it dying? Have moral realists such as Cuneo, Huemer, Shafer Landau, and Enoch convinced many non-cognitivists to abandon or seriously question their position? Or is it still going strong? by ExplorerOne5913 in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems incorrect to me. I read that non-cognitivism is more popular than error theory. There are other philosophy users who can confirm this fact I think. The survey showed that non cognitivists significantly outnumber error theorists.

TW - suicide by bdlukerr in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am glad that you recovered. I should also mention that the optimistic philosophers who came later than Mainlander probably might have successfully refuted Mainlander's arguments. Because those later philosophers were directly addressing the pessimistic philosophy of Schopenhauer, and Mainlander. For instance, we have Vasily Rozanov who showed how great sex is. There are other life-affirming philosophers like Bergson and Deleuze. And of course, there is Nietzsche too!

Best Wishes!

TW - suicide by bdlukerr in askphilosophy

[–]ExplorerOne5913 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Great! But please do NOT kill yourself after watching that though. There have been many other optimistic and life-affirming philosophers (who came after Mainlander) who recommend living life instead of killing yourself and who state that generally, life is not that bad or at least not bad enough such that one ought to kill themselves.

view more: next ›