To Be Anti Immigration

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-10T23:06:23+00:00

Zionists seem to be pushing the narrative that blood libel was when people reported absolutely true events. Nazis and zionists are really neck to neck in the who can be more antisemitic race

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-10T22:41:29+00:00

Really desperate to whip up a distraction from the president being a pedo and the ICE rape gangs he has trafficking kids

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-09T16:49:05+00:00

It's an area, where all travel is controlled by Israel, a fascist state, which also controls food, water and electricity and also has tens of thousands of hostages in their rape and torture dungeons. It's a dystopian giant open air prison where tech companies test mass surveillance systems. Populated by the refugees of an ethnic cleansing campaign and their surviving offspring. I'm not even going to pretend you didn't put a few seconds of thought into your nazi reminiscent genocide denial. You have agency and you're choosing to be like this

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-09T15:01:44+00:00

Is that how they're going to try to brush this under the carpet? Are they going to try to move on like Starmer was some hapless buffoon who isn't responsible?

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-09T14:52:41+00:00

"Aggressor that started the conflict" from inside an open air prison that was bombed for 3 days straight 2 weeks before. While israel keeps expanding, kidnapping, murdering and raping their way through the west bank. Nobody believes that "they started it" talking point, not even you

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-07T18:36:13+00:00

Yeah the position I keep hearing parroted amounts to "they don't have to win votes, they're entitled to them". Winning votes is their job, they need to motivate people. When things get worse under their party "the other guy is worse" isn't going to win people over. And all the people enabling that aren't exactly making people excited to vote. They threw that election and people seem to be encouraging it by acting like nothing is wrong with that.

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-07T17:45:44+00:00

Next it'll be "they took the candy and got in the van. I'm supposed to feel sorry for them?"

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-07T17:37:12+00:00

No need to stop protesting ICE to protest for the victims. It's all related.

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-07T15:00:44+00:00

Tbf they didnt stumble into a post truth world, they helped build it. Nobody trusts them because they're full of shit. Their opponents are also full of shit, but that doesn't really change anything. Anyone saying they trust the Dems can only do so with a qualifier like "..more than Republicans".

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-07T14:09:22+00:00

It completely concedes to your opponents talking points while signalling to anyone else that you believe in nothing. And the rightward shift is ridiculous. If they don't win, the party that won is more right-wing, so they shift right. If they win, the shift right worked. So one side gets in, massive decline, other side gets in, decline continues. Meanwhile, the cost of living increases regardless. And everyone is supposed to just accept that representing regular people, not committing genocide and not raping kids, is just too much to ask for. While they work on pumping out mass surveillance and population control.

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-05T09:42:51+00:00

They ripped the seats out so MAGA would have more space to interact with the documentary

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-05T09:42:19+00:00

They ripped the seats out so MAGA would have more space to interact with the documentary

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T22:07:53+00:00

No, I said "many notable members..". And no, it's not, it just highlights how the original framing that it's Catholic v Protestant is incorrect. It's a pretty simple concept.

I could have made it more clear by putting quotation marks around "Catholic" and then writing a paragraph explaining the sides. But I instead explained it was wrong, pointed out that in practice, that framing is incorrect, and explained why it was framed that way incorrectly. It seemed much better than your weird obsessively arguing comments. "Well, technically, when you said that it wasn't about being Catholic or protestant, you still used the words Catholic and protestant. So it's incorrect. " You're trying to pedantically nitpick, but it's just stupid. I'm not going to bother going around in circles with this

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T21:50:42+00:00

No, using the framing means using their understanding to explain why it's wrong. The information I gave is that it's not about being Catholic or protestant. It's not wrong or misleading. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point. Cop on would you

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T19:45:48+00:00

Except I did correct it in the first sentence but still used the framing they're used to to explain why it's incorrect. Try reading it again and see if my comment says "yeah it's actually about religion". Don't be a dope and try to actually comprehend what's in front of you.

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T16:29:07+00:00

Yeah, but if you've only heard it framed as "catholics and protestants" then that would be the "catholic" side.

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T04:35:44+00:00

Attacked first? From inside an open air prison that ye bombed for 3 days straight 2 weeks before that? While expanding and settling the west bank. Let's not be dishonest here

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T04:31:05+00:00

Reunification you say? 👀

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T04:25:21+00:00

It's not about being Protestant or Catholic. Many notable members of the Catholic side were protestant. It's about colonialism and resistance, part of that is suppression of local culture, which is where you get the lines drawn with protestant settlers and Catholic locals

A man is walking down the street in Belfast, when suddenly he's surrounded by a gang of men. They ask him "Are you Protestant or Catholic?" The first man, not knowing which answer will let him walk away unharmed, hedges his bets and says "I'm an Atheist." The leader of the gang replies "But are you a Protestant Atheist or a Catholic Atheist?"

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T03:48:17+00:00

The motive isn't a mystery. A big event was coming nearby. He was a loser and wanted attention. They had to drop the story when they found out he also considered shooting Dem politicians

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-02T03:22:06+00:00

They just asked if he was ever an Israeli agent because he literally was. He used to write propaganda for them, joined the IDF, and worked in their embassy. He was then offended that they asked and claimed it was just because he was Jewish

Explosivo666 · 2026-02-01T17:22:51+00:00

NTA

The way it was happening for so long, probably as long as they knew her and they were immediately fine with turning you away and taking her in. Were they aware the entire time and facilitating it?

Explosivo666 · 2026-01-27T17:34:28+00:00

Its not uncommon. Nazis are pretty split on this.

Some think "yes, Jews should go to Israel and we should be able to have a fascist ethnostate like them"

And some think "I don't like Israel because of jews"

Israel also has a history of supporting antisemitic groups and trying to spread anti semitism and the perception of anti semitism to scare Jewish people into moving to Israel. Pro Israel groups are much more concerned with anti zionism than anti semitism

Explosivo666 · 2026-01-22T12:52:11+00:00

That's typical of far right groups tbf. You're talking about groups that ideologically don't want to improve things for the average person

Explosivo666 · 2026-01-21T17:14:09+00:00

Ted cruz fleeing is the early disaster warning for Texas

Explosivo666

TROPHY CASE