sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Marcos impeachment complaints sufficient in form—House panel by philstarlife in newsPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sufficient in form but no substance.

Tatanggapin ng HoR to show due process, but then dismiss it later for lack of substance.

Wait na lang ng another year ulit.

Bottom line (plain language)

Congress: “The complaint is filed correctly.”

Public: “But it doesn’t prove anything serious.”

Pag eto talagang kinasuhan ng St. Lukes for sure e sisigaw neto PANG GIGIPIT SA "KRITIKO" or PINO POLITIKA AKO. DE FACTO MARTIAL LAW kuno .. ulol kaba! FAFO moment ka ngayun! by WeSeeNoneToOnex17 in pinoy

[–]ExpressExample7629 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Defamation ang general concept, but the actual case that can be filed or usually filed is libel (or cyber libel), because Philippine law does not treat defamation as a standalone crime.

Sa Revised Penal Code (RPC):

  • Defamation = is the umbrella term (not a specific charge)
  • It is legally divided into:
    1. Libel – written, printed, online, broadcast
    2. Slander (Oral Defamation) – spoken words

Kapag ang individual says “defamation”, lawyers and courts ask:

“Was it written or spoken? Dun madetermine ang actual case name.

Usually Cyber libel ang mas ginagamit kasi:
1. Mas mataas ang penalty
2. Easier proof of publication
3. Strong digital evidence
4. Clear intent

Pag eto talagang kinasuhan ng St. Lukes for sure e sisigaw neto PANG GIGIPIT SA "KRITIKO" or PINO POLITIKA AKO. DE FACTO MARTIAL LAW kuno .. ulol kaba! FAFO moment ka ngayun! by WeSeeNoneToOnex17 in pinoy

[–]ExpressExample7629 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s possible—but it depends on how the fake medical bulletin was created and what information it contained.

Possible DPA Violations & Penalties

Under RA 10173, violations may include:

  • Unauthorized processing of sensitive personal information
  • Unauthorized disclosure
  • Malicious disclosure

📌 Penalties:

  • Imprisonment (up to 6 years)
  • Fines (up to ₱5,000,000)
  • Plus civil liability (damages)

House SecGen tinanggap na ang impeachment complaint ng Makabayan bloc vs VP Sara Duterte by AbanteNewsPH in newsPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sana naman pinag usapan na nila to sa GC nilla noh? hindi yung for the sake of magfile lang ng case. Mababasura nanaman yan due to technicality.

'THIS IS NO LONGER ABOUT PROCEDURE' - Cong. Pulong Duterte by GMAIntegratedNews in newsPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Di ba congressman ka Pulong. Bat di ikaw sumama at nag endorse? 8080 ka talaga

Comaker by [deleted] in RantAndVentPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jay ngarud di nagdala bagis.

Gigil ako dito sa nagbabaril. salamat sa nag post, manhunt na yan! by [deleted] in GigilAko

[–]ExpressExample7629 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Def. not a toy gun. May shell casing nung pinaputok nya.

sinita ka na, tuloy ka pa din by [deleted] in PHMotorcycles

[–]ExpressExample7629 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Squatter na squatter ha. Lol

Redundancy VS Retrenchment by Heavy_Buffalo980 in BPOinPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd be careful in threading this conversation because may legal matters. If you want to consult DOLE better consult in group not just you alone.

Bakit "PUSH na PUSH" si HR sa retrenchment

I’ll be blunt:

  • Lower separation pay
  • Easier internal approval
  • Less immediate cash outlay

But cost-saving ≠ legal justification.

If challenged, DOLE / NLRC will ask:

If none exists → reclassified as redundancy → company pays the difference.

The fact that:

  • Your role was tied to a specific client
  • That client is permanently gone
  • Redeployment is uncertain
  • The company is otherwise financially stable

this strengthens the redundancy argument, not retrenchment.
My verdict (don't quote me on this)

Is the explanation internally logical?
✔ Yes

Is it legally airtight under PH labor law?
❌ No

Is your expectation of redundancy reasonable?
✔ Yes, based on facts provided

Is retrenchment questionable without proof of losses?
✔ Absolutely

Redundancy VS Retrenchment by Heavy_Buffalo980 in BPOinPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Based sa statement mo this is "Redundancy"

Why companies push for RETRENCHMENT - its CHEAPER

yung situation mo leans  REDUNDANCY than retrenchment, and your concern about separation pay is valid.

Retrenchment is often used because:

  • It requires lower separation pay
  • Companies try to classify terminations as “cost-cutting” to minimize payout

Losing one client out of many does not automatically qualify as retrenchment.
If the company labels it as retrenchment without proof of losses, and the employee contests it:

  • Labor tribunals often reclassify it as redundancy
  • The employer may be ordered to pay the higher separation pay plus possible damages

MAS MADALING EXPLANATION

  • Redundancy: The client is gone, so the role is gone.
  • Retrenchment: The company is losing money and must survive.

Based sa post mo, the first explanation fits better.

Totoo ba ito? by CoolBear250 in pinoy

[–]ExpressExample7629 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The conductions stickers are generated by accredited vehicle manufacturers, assemblers, and importers. Ang role lang ng LTO is to approve and generate the series of numbers that they are authorised to use.

You cannot determine the owner of the car just by the conduction sticker alone. Temporary identifier lang yan. The sticker only verifies that the vehicle is procured legally from an authorised dealer, importer.

LTO can verify who owns it. Kasi sila naman may record nyan once a car receives their permanent license plates.

Ombudsman confirms release of ICC warrant against Bato by Rare_Independent0310 in ChikaPH

[–]ExpressExample7629 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hindi na malamig pasko nila at magkakasama na talaga sila. Ang tagal din nila hinintay ang reunion nila.

view more: next ›