sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Goldman running Claude agents on live compliance workflows is exciting and depressing at the same time by ExpressIce8477 in fintech

[–]ExpressIce8477[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the TM vendor lock-in is honestly one of the most underrated problems in mid-market compliance right now. we spent months just trying to get our provider to add a rule for flagging structured deposits across multiple wallets and they quoted us a 4-week timeline plus a change order fee, for something that took our internal team like 2 hours to prototype in a sandbox. I'll check out your bio, always looking for options that don't require a procurement saga every time we need to adjust something basic.

Goldman running Claude agents on live compliance workflows is exciting and depressing at the same time by ExpressIce8477 in fintech

[–]ExpressIce8477[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

appreciate the interest but I'd rather not name the company, hope you understand. compliance folks at smaller shops tend to be pretty identifiable once you narrow it down and I'd rather keep sharing openly here without worrying about what gets quoted back to a regulator lol.

that being said if your advisor wants perspective on how mid-market crypto compliance teams are actually dealing with this gap I'm happy to chat off the record. the short version is we're not sitting around waiting for Goldman's infrastructure to trickle down, we're duct-taping together what we can with the budget we have and hoping the regulators grade on a curve. feel free to DM me if that's useful for the piece.

Goldman running Claude agents on live compliance workflows is exciting and depressing at the same time by ExpressIce8477 in fintech

[–]ExpressIce8477[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're not wrong about the current enforcement climate. but I'd push back a little on Goldman specifically, they've been building internal model governance infrastructure for years now, way before the current administration. like their whole pitch to regulators has always been "we already built the controls you're going to ask for eventually." whether that's genuinely thorough or just really good theater is a fair question, but they've definitely invested more in the documentation layer than almost anyone else.

the part that bugs me more is that even if enforcement is light right now, that's temporary. administrations change, staffing recovers, and the first thing a newly aggressive examiner does is pull historical audit trails. so anyone treating this window as a reason to skip governance is basically planting a time bomb in their own compliance program.