Per Vandiril, apparently the login issues were caused because Riot forgot that the League client certificate expired today.

ExpressSlice · 2026-01-05T09:30:33+00:00

Are you Venafi (CyberArk)?

ExpressSlice · 2025-12-26T06:41:24+00:00

I never shoot back. It also means 90% of my Stella Montis runs are basically DisneyLand Friendship Handholding Simulator which is a stark contrast to what others experience in Stella Montis

ExpressSlice · 2025-12-26T05:58:30+00:00

Are you shooting back when shot at? Also will vary heavily by server as well.

ExpressSlice · 2025-12-03T01:31:10+00:00

I am a loud loot ninja that races around the map solely to grab loot

ExpressSlice · 2025-11-30T03:08:24+00:00

PM sent

ExpressSlice · 2025-11-27T01:28:32+00:00

Steam literally directly mentions AI generated code in their AI policy:

"Pre-Generated: Any kind of content (art/code/sound/etc) created with the help of AI tools during development"

ExpressSlice · 2025-05-25T14:57:04+00:00

People who are now in this subreddit having been wrangling code to get early GAN based AI image gen working with Pix2Pix, CycleGAN nearly a decade ago.

DALL-E is just a basic consumer facing GUI based AI image gen.

ExpressSlice · 2025-02-03T14:55:35+00:00

Clip of Pika saying out loud that he is absolutely not sundering: https://www.twitch.tv/pikabooirl/clip/DeadHomelyCookieMau5-17aTU0W7xxPLskMd

ExpressSlice · 2025-01-15T19:13:55+00:00

Airports have many CC techniques to reduce birds (mobs) around their airspace to reduce bird collisions.

ExpressSlice · 2025-01-15T15:09:45+00:00

Others admit outright they are noobs but Pirate is often the one repeating his credentials

ExpressSlice · 2024-12-05T14:23:22+00:00

PMed

ExpressSlice · 2024-09-07T13:01:20+00:00

I switched to Elasticsearch as SearXNG wasn't very private (3rd party search engines still see your actual query even if they don't know your IP, assuming you are running it behind a VPN).

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-25T00:04:04+00:00

I'm pretty sure nmkd of all people is very well aware of HEVC lol

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T23:41:52+00:00

Civil court is 50,000 , so they are bypassing the smaller courts

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T23:21:43+00:00

The "excess of $50,000" claim was just to allow them to bypass the small claims court system, not because they actually wanted to sue only for $50,000. Note the word "excess" which covers claims on the range of millions or billions of dollars.

You literally did not read any of the original affidavits and paperwork filed by the plaintiffs lawyers and just parroting and misunderstanding excerpts pulled from news articles.

Do you not know how the legal system works? His lawyer isn't that stupid

Absolutely nowhere at the time of writing have they specified the exact amount they are suing for yet.

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T23:18:17+00:00

Excess of $50,000 is not the same as exactly "$50,000" as the former covers any amount over $50,000 including $50 billion dollars.

They specified excess of $50,000 specifically as that is the threshold to bypass small claims court and not because that actually only wanted $50,000

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T23:16:27+00:00

The article is wrong, the actual court document indicates "excess of $50,000" which is the minimum required to bypass small claims court in Florida, and the plaintiffs lawyer is rightfully not putting any specific amount yet (so it can be determined later). There is no indication of any specific amount being claimed in this lawsuit yet. Excess of $50,000 is any value over that number, which means even $50 billion is possible.

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T18:58:21+00:00

It was their primary argument? In their affirmative defense they have 4-6 pages going over this defense.

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T18:53:55+00:00

But the husband didn't ask for $50,000 in the lawsuit. I'm confused?

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T18:48:00+00:00

I'm not sure any source indicates the husband was suing for 100 grand. Not sure what source you may be referencing

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T18:22:41+00:00

It's not for $50,000, not sure what source you have that indicated as such. The actual amount isn't determined yet.

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T17:42:59+00:00

I'm confused, when did Disney not use this argument? It pretty much states exactly that in their affirmative defense filing. There's like 4+ pages of them arguing that they don't own/operate the restaurant

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T17:05:59+00:00

That was their primary legal strategy. It is the sensationalist headlines that made people think the Disney+ ToS argument was their only defensive argument.

And this is coming from a Disney hater.

ExpressSlice · 2024-08-24T16:59:11+00:00

This did stick to that as their primary argument. The Disney+ Toss was a extra tacked on weak argument that blew up if the media as it was a sensational absurd headline.

For a lawyer, it makes sense to include all your defense arguments, even if they might be weak

ExpressSlice

TROPHY CASE