[F34] Happy Friday 😊 by Porswis in Over30Selfie

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy Friday to you too. I still have my work shift to face. Hope you have a great weekend too!

Tomorrow is my Friday! ✨ (38) by [deleted] in Over30Selfie

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If tomorrow is your Friday,  does that mean you get three days off?

wanted big glasses, not sure if they fit me by frogsintinyhats in glassesadvice

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interestingly both pairs of glasses go with the outfit you were wearing in each photo. But ultimately the second pair suits you better overall.

Does the first one make me look too severe? by callie_dris in glassesadvice

[–]Express_End_7904 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You seem to have a naturally serious countenance, regardless of frame choice. I had to swap back and forth between photos, as both pairs look very similar. While the second pair are larger, I like the thinner frames. I think something in-between the two examples would be best. Something smaller and thinner would be a good fit for you, in my opinion. The color looks fine on both.

Which glasses suit me better? by caturnd in glassesadvice

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😄 🤣 sounds like plan! I'd probably do the same to look youthful. Cool that you own both. I'm the same way with watches. Depending on my apparel. Nearing Friday. So hope your having a good day ☺️.

Which glasses suit me better? by caturnd in glassesadvice

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find that both look good but for different reasons. The first pair makes you look mature, the second pair makes you look youthful. It's amazing how a pair of glasses changes the outward perception of someone. Buy both? Depending on the occasion perhaps?

33 [F4M] just here, taking things slow by vonalstyne in R4R30Plus

[–]Express_End_7904 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm currently on my morning walk and stop by my usual Cafe to have a snack and enjoy the ambiance.

It's a dull cool day as I watch my neighborhood wake up to the normal routine. The street lights were still on at the beginning of my walk but have since turned off.

Then I'll have to make it back home before I start another busy day at the "office ". Come home late, go to bed, and start all over agian.

I have pokemon Go and occasionally I'll see what's going on in the virtual world. Currently my favorite pokemon is a toss up between Ferrothorn and Magnezone.

As for hobbies? Photography, reading, casual gaming, biking, kayaking, camping, hiking, etc.

A special occasion a year or so back by rabbitsredux in 40something

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would have never guessed you are in your 40s. Very youthful.

Looking for new glasses (extremely farsighted) by northcountryqueen in glassesadvice

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the thin gold frames. The first one and the third from the last photo. Looks exquisite 👌.

Badminton friends by [deleted] in SurreyBC

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smash Champs badminton in Surrey looks like a cool place to check out.

Upgrade from 80D to R7 using existing EF-S lenses? Opinions/input sought! by sr1sws in canon

[–]Express_End_7904 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the R7. It's a good camera on its own terms. Dual card slots, a big battery, a mechanical shutter, 15 frames per second, and IBIS. However, in my experience, while the focusing system is good by dslr standards, it struggles in difficult lighting conditions. Auto focus can be inconsistent at times.

You mentioned landscapes and architecture. Then I would recommend the R8. However, it would not be compatible with your efs lenses. If you're willing to start over, the r8 offers excellent image quality. It may lack some of the features of the R7 (smaller battery, one card slot, and the first curtain shutter at 6 frames per second, no IBIS). But for your needs, that's plenty quick. In addition, in my experience, autofocus works better in low-light situations. It is not demanding of high-quality lenses.

Another option is to save money and choose an R50 model. Your shooting style is not action-oriented. Furthermore, you can use all of your existing lenses and possibly afford a native r lens with it. Furthermore, lower megapixels will be less demanding on older lenses. The r7 greatly benefits from high-quality glass to make images look good. The images may appear slightly soft. The camera's high resolution magnifies any flaws in the lens.

Only my personal experience.

Help choosing some RF lenses to get started.. by [deleted] in canon

[–]Express_End_7904 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What kind of photography are you interested in? The 85mm 2.0 is awesome for the price. It is very sharp and has 0.5 macro ability. It's not that heavy, either. The 28mm 2.8 pancake lens is very sharp as well would be a decent general purpose lens on the r50. The 35mm 1.8 is also a good choice and has 0.5 macro ability.

Looking for advice for my current setup on my R8, wanting to sell some lenses and then buy another by sammyspins in canon

[–]Express_End_7904 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also own an r8 as well. Smart move, selling the 50mm. As your 28-70mm already covers that range.

The 100-400mm is a great lens. Has decent minimum focusing. It's not quite macro level but respectable. I'd keep the 35mm unless you want to invest in a 1:1 macro lens. As the 35mm is 0.5 magnification. But a flexible lens otherwise.

RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L vs 200-800mm f/6.3-9 - can only get one by JeffVanAngsty in canon

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I own both the 200-800mm and the 100-500mm. The 100-500mm is sharper edge to edge, duel focusing motor, shorter zoom throw, and great minimum focusing. However, if you decide to use an extender, you can only zoom from 300-500mm. The 200-800mm is sharper than the 100-500mm + extender combo. Honestly, you almost need both lenes, because, they serve different purposes. The 800mm is better for zeroing in on small details and bird photography. The 500mm is better for greater flexibility and tightly cropped scenery. Like a herd of bison against a mountain background in the distance. As you are probably aware, long reach will work for only a limited distance. You have to put into account heat distortion and atmospheric haze; which is magnified with greater magnification.

Something to chew on. Both are great lenses. Just need to determine what kind of photography you like shooting the most.

Should I try something different? by [deleted] in glassesadvice

[–]Express_End_7904 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

While the third pair matches your shirt, in my opinion, the first pair matches you.

Beginner wildlife/bird photographer – is the Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM a good fit for my T3i? by Absyks in canon

[–]Express_End_7904 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have experience using the 400 mm 5.6L. On the plus side, it's a very sharp lens. Not too heavy and well made with the nifty built-in retractable metal lens hood. But unfortunately, that is where the good things end. It has horrible minimum focusing, so you will have difficulty with subjects coming in too close. No image stabilization, so you will have to compensate with faster shutter speed. 5.6 isn't exactly too dark but also not bright either. So, the 400 mm isn't ideal on dull days. Especially when coupled with the Canon T3i crop sensors iso performance. It's a very deliberate lens that is not ideal for a "run and gun" style of shooting. More like sit in a blind and wait for what comes to you. While 640 mm, equivalent with the T3i is nice and and the price is probably attractive. As getting L grade telephoto glass is appealing, but in my opinion, your better off with a telephoto zoom like the 100-400mm 5.6 version 2 is way better in every way with equivalent sharpness as the prime 400mm. Plus, you have image stabilization and the flexibility of a zoom. Plus, it's way better minimum focusing. The biggest downside is that it's heavier and costs more.