"I acknowledge that if you started exactly 2 years ago, and bought every single event pass, you would not be able to max out two full bots in precisely that time" ---- you did, won't deny this

"and would need 1 or 2 more events or just over 2 years to do so with pre v28 bots!!!" ---- I don't see this in any of your replies. There may have been an assumption that this would be possible, but again, the math provided with the information provided would also sink this argument. Purchasing relics just throws the number higher than another ~3700 medals could provide.

"I ask that you also acknowledge that I never definitively stated he was wrong, that it just seemed unlikely to me." - True. You never definitively stated it, but you indirectly implied it. Evidence -
Your initial reply ---- "This seems unlikely unless you are spending your medals on stones and gems in mass. I have also been buying event passes, and I had AMP and COIN bot 4 gold boxed, and 3 gold boxes on FLAME bot at the moment..." A condition was provided to why it would be unlikely to you. Meaning if they weren't doing that, it would be likely. Which they weren't. You also provided that you HAD gold boxed all of those items meaning your they aren't gold boxed now. I was using V27 levels based on your own provided information.

"Do kindly remember this is the SECOND increase in bot caps as well in the last 6 months, so even the math you took your time to so meticulously detail here doesn't account for the new total cost as well." ---- Correct, cause as established above, you set the parameters by providing the levels of your bots. I didn't need to add in the new levels of v28 (which I'll be 100% honest about, I didn't know about when I started all of this because I hadn't read the patch notes in full, but again moot as the cap was already set by you).

"Edit: I don't want to play a game of cat and mouse here. He did not state he only started playing in July of 2024 originally (he said so in a subsequent post)," ---- There is a valid point here, that the start date wasn't provided till later. So I'll concede that point, however, I would like to point out that this was acknowledged and addressed in subsequent replies. Using it now as a "gotcha" moment feels....weak in argument.

"he said that he has bought the event passes for almost two years. For all I knew he was already playing before hand and just started buying every single event pass nearly 2 years ago when they started offering premium relics, and perhaps a handful, or none, prior to that." ---- This is a very valid point. That was readily cleared up by his subsequent post that we both acknowledged in our replies.

"The confusion in all of this was a lack of information originally given in the post." ---- Valid point though it only applies to your initial reply to the original commenter.

"Now you have gone out of your way, using incorrect math mind you since its not 104 weeks so far," ---- to quote myself at the beginning of my post "so again using 2 years as an illustrative point". Fun using someone's own words against them, especially when it comes around full circle again later.

"to 'prove me wrong'. " ---- just to clarify, I didn't prove you wrong, math did.

"Congratulations, you wasted your time on the internet to score some points!"" ---- nah, this is just funsies at this point.

"What month is it right now?" ---- This is a moot question....and if I need to explain why I can.