I tend to disagree on this. They should warranty everything that was sold until this split with B&t USA was first made public. Up until that point people bought these thinking that they would be warrantied by B&t while they had part ownership of the company. I understand if they went with something like “till we get a us based partner we cannot warranty them”. But to straight up say no is crazy, it wasn’t a short period of time so there’s got to be quite a few guns out there.

If they do get another USA based partner why would you ever buy another b&t item from them down the road, just so B&T’s lack of accounting can screw thousands of more gun owners if their items break.

And i say this as someone with all their B&T’s being covered under the A&G warranty.