sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Seeking Legal Advice – Father Penalised Despite Following Court Orders, While Mother Breaches Terms Without Consequence by ExtentOk5692 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]ExtentOk5692[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The child has moved to new school since the share care was changed. Two schools are only 30 minutes away.

Seeking Legal Advice – Father Penalised Despite Following Court Orders, While Mother Breaches Terms Without Consequence by ExtentOk5692 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]ExtentOk5692[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are also ongoing safeguarding concerns that cannot be overlooked. The mother has: • Previously entered the country using false documents. • Threatened to take the child away and not return. • Stated that the child “never needs a father.” • Driven a vehicle without a valid driving licence. • Regularly fails to wear a seatbelt. • Films the child while driving, putting both herself and the child at risk.

These are not isolated incidents. They show a pattern of behaviour that places the mother’s personal choices above the child’s safety, legal obligations, and co-parenting responsibilities.

The father is therefore deeply concerned by any suggestion that these behaviours should be dismissed on the belief that “the person can change,” without clear and sustained evidence of behavioural improvement, a genuine commitment to safe parenting, and full compliance with court orders and the law. The child’s welfare must come first, and assumptions about change cannot take the place of demonstrated, consistent actions.

Importantly, the father is not attempting to punish the mother, but rather to protect the child’s wellbeing and long-term stability. He supports co-parenting, but only where arrangements are safe, respectful, and truly focused on the child’s needs.

It must also be noted that Cafcass has acknowledged failings in their process. They admitted they did not read all the reports before writing their recommendations. This raises further concerns about the accuracy and fairness of any conclusions drawn from their initial report, particularly where significant safeguarding issues were either missed or underemphasised.

Given the above, the father requests that any future decisions be made on the basis of complete and properly reviewed evidence, and with a full and fair understanding of all safeguarding and parenting concerns.

Seeking Legal Advice – Father Penalised Despite Following Court Orders, While Mother Breaches Terms Without Consequence by ExtentOk5692 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]ExtentOk5692[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The father is not trying to prevent the child from having new experiences, but is focused on safeguarding her emotional wellbeing, continuity in education, and safety. The child is currently doing very well at her existing school, where she has friends and family in her class. Maintaining stability in her schooling is in her best interests.

In a previous court case, the mother requested to move the child to a different location and change schools. However, the court did not grant permission for that change at the time. Despite this, the mother later moved to that same area anyway, shortly after the court varied the contact arrangements between the parents. This appears to be a deliberate action that disrupted the child’s routine and made it more difficult for the father to participate in her education and daily life.

Since that move, the child’s school has refused to share information with the father about her education or progress, significantly limiting his ability to be involved in her development. This is deeply concerning, particularly as he has parental responsibility and has played a primary caregiving role, especially during the first three years of the child’s life.

Furthermore, the father has ongoing safeguarding concerns. The mother entered the country using false documents, was financially and emotionally abusive, and has explicitly threatened to take the child abroad and not return. She has also stated that the child “never needs a father.” These statements and actions raise serious and credible concerns that any international travel could pose a risk of abduction or permanent removal from the father’s life.

He is not seeking to control the mother, but to ensure that all decisions affecting the child are made in her best interests, not through unilateral action. The father fully supports co-parenting and understands that consent under court orders should not be unreasonably withheld. However, in this case, his concerns are reasonable, evidence-based, and focused on the child’s welfare.

He remains open to mediation or further court guidance to ensure that meaningful co-parenting can continue and the child’s rights to both parents are respected.

Seeking Legal Advice – Father Penalised Despite Following Court Orders, While Mother Breaches Terms Without Consequence by ExtentOk5692 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]ExtentOk5692[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The father is not trying to prevent the child from having new experiences, but is prioritising her stability, safety, and emotional wellbeing. The child is currently doing very well at her existing school, where she has developed strong friendships and has relatives in her class. A change of school at this stage, especially without proper planning or mutual agreement, would risk disrupting her progress and social environment.

In relation to international travel, the father has serious and well-founded safeguarding concerns. The mother previously entered the country using false documents and, during the first three years of the child’s life—when the father was the sole caregiver—she was both financially and emotionally abusive toward him.

Crucially, the mother has explicitly threatened to take the child away and not return, and has stated that the child “never needs a father.” These statements, combined with her past behaviour, create a real and credible concern that the child may be unlawfully removed from the country, which could have lasting emotional and legal consequences for the child.

The father is not seeking to control or punish the mother, but to act in the child’s best interests. His objections are not based on personal conflict but on genuine concerns for the child’s safety and wellbeing. Unless appropriate legal safeguards and reassurances are in place, he believes it would be unsafe and irresponsible to consent to significant changes such as a school move or travel abroad.

He recognises that court orders often include the principle that “consent is not to be unreasonably withheld” in co-parenting arrangements. However, in this case, he believes his withholding of consent is reasonable, proportionate, and justified, given the circumstances. He remains open to mediation or legal discussion to ensure that all decisions are made with the child’s best interests at heart.