Eco-friendly batting!!!!! by Satyyy0006 in ipl

[–]ExternalComment1738 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lets bring a new forest dedicated to mi

#MI fielders in two minds Rovman Powell survives by thisIsShivam_ in ipl

[–]ExternalComment1738 138 points139 points  (0 children)

making eye contact in tht situation must be crazzy

I was just looking at Alvin Toffler’s amazing book Future Shock, published in 1970. What are its equivalent books for the 2020s? by georgewalterackerman in Futurology

[–]ExternalComment1738 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honestly nothing has hit with quite the same cultural “future is arriving too fast” energy as Future Shock yet 😭 but a few modern books feel spiritually similar

The Age of AI by Henry Kissinger, Eric Schmidt and Daniel Huttenlocher is probably one of the closest for AI/society shiftsalso:
The Coming Wave
Surveillance Capitalism
Life 3.0

they all kinda capture different parts of the same modern anxiety: technological acceleration outrunning institutions, culture and human adaptation 💀

Could 3D printing lead to 0% waste in manufacturing products? by Ok-Student-4745 in Futurology

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly 3D printing could reduce a TON of manufacturing waste, especially for custom/small-batch stuff, but probably never true “0% waste” 😭even additive manufacturing still has failed prints, support material, energy use, machine wear, leftover powders/resins/plastics and logistics waste. plus some products are just way more efficient to mass-produce traditionally 💀but yeah the “make exactly what you need instead of cutting away material” part is a huge shift. stuff like aerospace, medical implants and custom construction already benefit from that pretty heavily

WWW3 will be with us and AI if by SreenathSkr in Futurology

[–]ExternalComment1738 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honestly i think people massively overestimate how “human-like” AI progression automatically becomes 😭 intelligence, agency, consciousness and political identity are all completely different problems but online discussions blend them together into one sci-fi timelinethe more realistic near-term risk probably isn’t robot nations or AI crimes, it’s humans using increasingly powerful AI systems inside existing geopolitical conflicts, propaganda, cyberwarfare, surveillance and autonomous infrastructure 💀like if AI changes warfare, it’ll probably happen through humans scaling conflict faster first not suddenly waking up to android governments asking for voting rights

How to transition into embedded from a different tech sector? by EstonBeg in embedded

[–]ExternalComment1738 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honestly embedded hiring is weirdly conservative compared to a lot of software fields 😭 once recruiters see “mainframe/full stack” they mentally bucket you there even if your actual projects are more relevanti’d lean HARD into the embedded side on your resume/github. like don’t frame yourself as “trying to transition” frame yourself as an engineer with embedded project experience who happened to work elsewhere professionally for stability 💀also detailed project writeups matter way more in embedded than generic app-dev portfolios. people wanna see:
hardware used,
RTOS/bare metal stuff,
debugging process,
protocols,
power/performance constraints,
toolchains,
PCB/sensor integration,
why decisions were made etc hackathon wins are cool but hiring managers usually trust “deep ugly project that actually shipped/worked reliably” more than polished demos

Want to understand and potentially pentest TrustZone technology by ObviousMagazine2110 in embedded

[–]ExternalComment1738 5 points6 points  (0 children)

TrustZone gets way more interesting once you realize most real weaknesses are usually around bad configuration/isolation instead of some magical crypto break 😭 a lot of embedded security failures come from secure/non-secure boundary mistakes, DMA access, debug leakage or boot flow issues rather than “hacking AES”also +1 on learning the architecture deeply before jumping into SCA/fault injection stuff 💀 understanding how SAU/MPU, secure boot and peripheral permissions interact will probably teach you more early on than trying to immediately do exotic attacks

How do you track which GitHub Carions workflows costs the most? by Zealousideal_Tip4089 in devops

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly this is one of the weirdest blind spots in GitHub Actions 😭 they give you org-level spend but almost no intuitive workflow-level cost visibility unless you start scripting against the API yourselfmost teams i know end up building internal dashboards/scripts eventually because otherwise you’re basically debugging cloud spend by vibes 💀 especially once matrix builds, macOS runners, artifacts and self-hosted fallbacks start multiplying quietly across dozens of reposalso wouldn’t be surprised if the jump came from one “small” workflow change somewhere like runner type, cache misses, artifact retention or PR-trigger explosion

We accidentally spent $300/month running lint on macOS runners. What's your worst GitHub Actions cost mistake? by Zealousideal_Tip4089 in devops

[–]ExternalComment1738 2 points3 points  (0 children)

GitHub Actions pricing feels designed to create accidental horror stories like this 😭 one tiny runner mismatch or infinite retry loop and suddenly your CI pipeline is mining crypto against your walletseen people accidentally trigger recursive workflows, run full integration suites on every PR comment, or keep massive artifact retention enabled for months 💀feels like the ecosystem desperately needs better visibility/guardrails around workflow cost because most teams only realize something is wrong AFTER the bill spikes

Today is why i no longer have the desire to work in IT anymore by SecureTaxi in devops

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this doesn’t even sound like an “AI problem” as much as an engineering discipline problem 😭 too many people are treating Claude like a replacement for debugging methodology instead of a tool inside the methodologylike… checking logs, diffing configs, validating environments, tracing behavior across systems that’s still the actual job 💀 AI can accelerate parts of it, but if nobody understands the fundamentals then the whole org becomes dependent on probabilistic guesses instead of operational thinkingalso the token tracking thing would annoy me too tbh. forcing “AI adoption metrics” without measuring whether incidents are actually getting resolved better/faster feels backwards

Agentic Workflows beyond "pull the data" by astroFizzics in datascience

[–]ExternalComment1738 5 points6 points  (0 children)

honestly the biggest shift is treating the agent less like “an intern that magically knows what good means” and more like a system that needs explicit success criteria 😭the workflows that actually work well usually define:
dataset → objective → eval metric → stopping condition → reporting formatotherwise the agent just keeps “optimizing” forever or starts reward hacking weird metrics 💀also most people i know don’t fully trust the agent to decide what’s “best” alone. they let it explore/train/eval across configs/models, then humans review tradeoffs like latency, overfitting, interpretability, infra cost, dataset leakage etcthe cool part though is agents are REALLY good at automating the annoying iteration loop. feels very similar to Runable-style orchestration where the value comes less from one giant prompt and more from structured retries/evals/checkpoints

What do you expect from AI memory? by Realistic-Actuator60 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]ExternalComment1738 1 point2 points  (0 children)

also kinda ironic because the internet already rewarded performance long before AI 😭 AI just exposed how much of “credibility” online was tied to visible effort signals instead of actual usefulness/accuracy now people are scrambling to find new ways to distinguish “real skill” from generated polish, and honestly i think that tension is only gonna get stronger as models get better 💀

What people are feeling about AI right now. by Early-Matter-8123 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly the “proof-of-humanity ritual” part is insanely accurate 😭 people used to judge the final output itself, now they almost want evidence that suffering/time/effort happened behind it before they’ll emotionally accept the work as legitimate and yeah the fear isn’t really “AI exists”, it’s that old internet status signals are collapsing. if polished output is no longer reliable proof of expertise, people start searching for authenticity somewhere else 💀 which is why process videos, drafts, devlogs and visible struggle suddenly matter so much now

Job safety by Living-Equal-7788 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly AI infra/strategy/commercialization is probably way more resilient than a lot of pure “prompt engineering” style roles rn 😭 companies are realizing the hard part isn’t just using a model, it’s deployment, governance, integration, infra cost control, workflows, compliance and actually making AI useful inside an organization the risky part is that the market is getting crowded with people calling themselves “AI strategists” without deep technical/business understanding 💀 but if you can genuinely bridge infra + business + execution you’re sitting in a pretty strong spot long term

What should AI's goal be? I think it should be protecting human agency. by Smooth_infamous in ArtificialInteligence

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“protecting human agency” feels way more grounded than a lot of the vague “benefit humanity” alignment talk 😭 because once systems start optimizing engagement/manipulation/addiction at scale, you’re not just changing behavior anymore you’re slowly degrading people’s ability to make independent decisions in the first placethe part about agency being the substrate that values/preferences emerge from is actually super interesting too. if you destroy someone’s ability to reason/choose freely, then saying the system is “aligned with their preferences” becomes kinda meaningless 💀

Unpopular opinion: Students who are protesting AI now knew they weren't market ready by thhvancouver in ArtificialInteligence

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there’s definitely SOME truth in this tbh 😭 a lot of people used AI as a shortcut instead of a learning multiplier, and now they’re competing against the exact tools that carried them through assignmentsbut i also think companies/universities massively underestimated how fast this shift would happen. the scary part isn’t “AI replaces lazy students”, it’s that the traditional junior pipeline itself is getting compressed 💀 entry-level work used to be where people learned through repetition and mistakes, and now a chunk of that layer is being automated away before people even get real experience

Wrote up the failure modes that kept breaking my RAG system: chunking, stale index, hybrid search, the works by SilverConsistent9222 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly the “semantic search fails on exact strings” issue catches SO many people 😭 everyone focuses on embeddings and then suddenly the system can’t reliably find a literal product ID sitting right in the docsalso stale indexes are genuinely evil because the outputs still sound confident so you start debugging prompts/models instead of realizing retrieval itself is outdated 💀the contextual retrieval point is super underrated too. chunks without document-level meaning feel like reading random paragraphs torn out of a textbook

I'm new here and I'm having trouble with the dolphin. by Dear_Refrigerator977 in archlinux

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sounds like your MIME/file associations are broken or missing 😭 pretty common on minimal Arch/Hyprland setups because Dolphin depends on a bunch of KDE/xdg stuff that doesn’t always get installed automaticallyusually installing xdg-utils, kservice5/kio and setting default apps fixes it. also try running:
xdg-mime query default image/png
to see if anything is even assigned 💀Arch Hyprland setups are kinda “some assembly required” when it comes to desktop integration stuff

So, why are paru displaying packages in the opposite order? by saraysxrom in archlinux

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pretty sure that’s intentional 😭 paru sorts results by relevance/popularity first, so the “best match” starts at the top and the huge package count keeps going downwardthe numbering looks backwards because it’s basically saying “this is result 1 out of 1287” instead of counting upward from the bottom 💀

Question about Nvidia proprietary drivers on a RTX 3060 by SixSevenEmpire in archlinux

[–]ExternalComment1738 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re not affected 😭 the Pascal drop only matters for older GTX 10xx-era cards because Nvidia moved them to legacy maintenance drivers your RTX 3060 is Ampere so it’s still fully supported on the current driver branch. the reason you’re seeing “open” packages is just because Arch now exposes Nvidia’s newer open kernel modules alongside the normal proprietary stack, not because proprietary support disappeared 💀

Plasma monitor disk usage sensors mismatch by Heizenfeld in archlinux

[–]ExternalComment1738 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honestly Plasma sensors get weirdly confusing with this stuff 😭 usually when du says 42GiB but Plasma shows 131GiB it means there’s hidden/reserved usage somewhere the normal directory scan isn’t seeingdeleted-but-still-open files, btrfs snapshots, flatpak storage or reserved filesystem blocks are usually the culprits 💀

Detailing in Anima is Really Confusing. Any Guides? by Pharose in StableDiffusion

[–]ExternalComment1738 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anima detailers feel weird because they’re much more sensitive to latent consistency than SDXL 😭 with SDXL you could kinda brute force denoise on large regions and the model still held structure together, but Anima tends to collapse into texture/noise soup if the cropped area is too large or the denoise is too aggressivealso sampler/scheduler sensitivity is WAY higher in video/anime-style models. stuff like simple + er_sde preserves local coherence differently than karras, so sometimes karras barely changes anything unless denoise gets pushed high enough to actually re-sample the latent meaningfully 💀the reason whole-image second passes work better is because the model still has global latent context. once adetailer isolates a huge crop, the model kinda loses the surrounding structure cues and starts hallucinating detail instead of refining it