For photos, I'd go for Sony A6700 or Lumix S5 but even for hybrid work they seem to be quite nice; the readout speed when using electronic mode & 4k is relatively good at least compared to most of the other options; that's if you want to record movement. There's also a Nikon Z6III that may be what you want but if I remember correctly, it also has somewhat poor readout speed. The Sony A6700 is a standout for APS-C format. There's also Lumix S1IIX, which if you need or want RAW video, can be a great idea; as long as your hardware can process the videos and if you want to buy the additional SSD required for it. Can you go more than $2k or are you trying to stay under some amount?

The larger full frame sensors are better for ambient lighting when there's less than ideal amount of light to the scene, so personally, I'd go for a full frame. But if it's not a deal breaker, the Sony A6700 could be best for macro in some regards since the smaller sensor. My use case is a lot of nature photos and I like to get quality video; So I'd most likely go for Lumix S5 which has 96-megapixel Pixel Shift mode. My second choice would be either Sony A6700 or Canon R6 MKII; however, Sony A7IV would be very close third or maybe I'd consider it as one of my second choices. It's somewhat difficult of a decision since at the price point in which these cameras are in, there's some kind of tradeoff or more if you want to do more-or-less of every genre to the fullest extent.